WTC dust

[dafydd]

Obviously it was a trial run! Was it owned by anyone with a Jewish sounding name??? Did they "Make out like a bandit"?

I did see some Israelis dancing outside,and the transformer that started the fire was obviously a hologram and some of the steel left over was in the form of foam and some people said they saw a river of molten steel and a large spaceship hovering and sending down some sort of beam and the cardboard had turned to dust ( I know this because I collected some samples seven years later )and the Fire Chief's report was a cover up and the survivors were misdiagnosed with smoke inhalation instead of energy beam radiation poisoning and all the detritus was taken away and dumped very quickly and........ Quick nurse,the screens!

 

[WildCat]

I studied kinetic energy for my PhD, silly. My thesis title was "The Two State Model of Receptor Activation: The Agonist and the Efficacy" and I guarantee that a deep understanding of kinetic energy was required for me to produce this work.

This is the same "deep understanding of kinetic energy" that lead you to claim that when a WWII bomber hit the Empire State Building at 180 mph the occupants just walked out of the wreckage and took the elevator down?

 

[Porkpie Hat]

You got it wrong, Porkpie.

There's two different proofs. The more common one is about the bounce-back.

The one that (to my knowledge) originates with me is the wake aspect.

You didn't see bounceback, as in the bullet videos.
But you also didn't see evidence of a wake. I didn't put up a video for that, but I suggested that you imagine a boat moving through water if you didn't know what a wake is like.

Two completely different proofs of no planes.

There was bounce back, this was already determined by watching videos earlier in the thread....even at that it's up to you to present a coherant argument as to why things like bounce back and wakes would be relevant given what we all witnessed, and and still witness by watching the videos.

So far all we have is your assertion that what we do see is not compatible with airplane impacts.

S far you're batting zero on presenting an argument that can withstand ANY scrutiny.

Again, the wake you claim should be visually present in the plane videos was not visually present in the bullet impact videos which leads to the conclusion, taking your word as authoritative, that the bullet impacts in your video were also fake.

This leads to the question of why you'd post fake bullet impact videos in support of your claim?

 

[dafydd]

This is the same "deep understanding of kinetic energy" that lead you to claim that when a WWII bomber hit the Empire State Building at 180 mph the occupants just walked out of the wreckage and took the elevator down?

Yes,it went through the walls undamaged and made a perfect landing. That kind of deep understanding.

 

[dafydd]

This leads to the question of why you'd post fake bullet impact videos in support of your claim?

I assume that is a rhetorical question?

 

[WildCat]

Then, immediately, I noticed what the cigarette butts were sitting on and near. WTC DUST! Holy crapoly! I knew the moment I saw the dust that I had hit the motherlode of untouched WTC dust, and I did not stop before I collected some of it.

See the images located on http://wtcdust.blogspot.com for a real time record of my find.

The biggest discovery of my scientific career, so far.

Now that's just sad.

 

[dafydd]

Now that's just sad.

Cigarette butts and dust! All other scientific discoveries pale into insignificance. Can a Nobel prize be far away?

 

[The Big Dog]

Gee Dusty is too *********** lazy to google FAA Air Traffic Control (ATC, dusty, who would of thought!) Cleveland Center Flight 93.

Lazy, willfully ignorant or a troll?

Probably all three, huh folks.

Worthless thread is worthless.

 

[dafydd]

Gee Dusty is too *********** lazy to google FAA Air Traffic Control (ATC, dusty, who would of thought!) Cleveland Center Flight 93.

Lazy, willfully ignorant or a troll?

Probably all three, huh folks.

Worthless thread is worthless.

And very amusing. What will she come up with next? Watch this space.

 

[beachnut]

Bill, I pegged you as a Steven Jones zombie earlier. Just go.

bill smith and Steven Jones claims are not far-out enough to be included in your moronic claim steel turns to dust. I bet they return the favor. But you are in the same boat of fail with bill and Jones. Jones thinks the United States caused the earthquake in Haiti, that is equal to your steel turning to dust and no planes insanity.

...
How did iron oxide chips come into being? ....

Corrosion of iron. Rust. You have tough questions. Now I understand why you have no idea what happen on 911.

 

[Fonebone]

Steel reduced to open celled slag in milliseconds---

So what are you saying destroyed the WTC? Office fires?

Don't forget that jet fuel burns out quickly. No amount of jet fuel could exist in the WTC (even if your 19 Arab conspiracy is true) after about 5 minutes, maximum.

Then what did you have? A regular office fire.Again, according to your view point. The normal, regular things that make up an office caught fire, and an hour later or more, the buildings just went up POOOOF like that.

I disagree. Not that the buildings went POOF> Of course, they did. I disagree with the commonly accecpted explanation of a regular, normal office fire, plus a bit of damage from a plane crash, that caused the buildings to do that.

Planes have crashed into buildings more than once in history, and that stuff didn't happen. None of the buildings went POOF! None of the buildings left behind metallic foam, similar to the stuff I found in my home near Ground Zero.

Something else did it.

Dr. Judy Wood might be right, and she might be wrong. But whoever is right about what destroyed the buildings, it has to produce the kind of metallic foam that I possess.


Not a lot of things that I know about can produce this kind of material. That's my point to you JREFrs that I really wish you'd focus on. Planes are boring topics, once you realize that they played no role in the destruction of the WTC.

How about what I'm really talking about? The metallic foam????

Fonebone <
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=6563786#post6563786

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=6567655#post6567655

 

[brazenlilraisin]

What about an electromagnetic weapon with a frequency of zero and a infinite
wavelength that will transform steel into a open cell foam slag in milliseconds
with very little heat generation ?

Did they recover the jumper cables used to connect the battery weapon to the towers?

 

[chipmunk stew]

Dear Dr. Blevins,

You will not find a willing rube here for you to cash in on your dust selling scam.

Might I suggest that you do the play for a competing faction of "9/11 investigators." They always seem eager to be taken in by loopy ideas and more than willing to throw their money away on these sorts of things. You might have better luck directing your energies in that direction.

 

[Dash80]

That's one of the hilarious things about my discovery. If I hadn't spent all that time studying the dust, I would not have recognized it when I encountered it.

The cigarette butts? They play a larger role in the story, because previously the apartment managers had placed memos about cigarette butts in the common areas of my building. People were throwing cigarette butts off the top floors and the patio decks of the building, and the management wanted it to stop.

I went into this little nook because I was shellacking a piece of artwork and didn't want to gag all my neighbors with the spray. So I went in the nook. When I got inside, I noticed the cigarette butts and thought to myself, "That's what those memos were about."

Then, immediately, I noticed what the cigarette butts were sitting on and near. WTC DUST! Holy crapoly! I knew the moment I saw the dust that I had hit the motherlode of untouched WTC dust, and I did not stop before I collected some of it.

See the images located on http://wtcdust.blogspot.com for a real time record of my find.

The biggest discovery of my scientific career, so far. And it looks like dirt. Hahahahaha!

Good for you, I'm glad you find pissing on the dead victims so hilarious.

 

[Dash80]

I don't tend to google things unless I have a reason to be interested, and you didn't really give me one.

Also, there's ambiguous nature of what you would like me to google.

Can you give me a reason I should google a phrase like "ATC" when those letters could mean any one of a number of things?

I've got better things to do that google on demand, but if I'm interested, that's a different story.

Don't you know what ATC means? I googled "ATC audio 9/11" and found exactly what was needed, and you're meant to be the researcher! You could also try "Atta ATC tape" or replace Atta with "Jarrah" ITS NOT DIFFICULT!

 

[beachnut]

Fonebone <
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=6563786#post6563786

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=6567655#post6567655

That is as insane as the steel to dust delusion.

Oops, rust, and not dust.

 

[alienentity]

Just remember why I came to JREF. I came searching for a debunking.

It happened while you were out to lunch..

They are my samples. Until I'm thoroughly happy with the work done on the samples by myself and my collaborators, the independent researchers will have to wait.

But this actually brings up the outrageous thing I'm considering doing. I'm thinking of selling the samples. It's quite democratic, I think. You really think I'm wrong and want to disprove me using an independent analysis? It will be possible, now.

Not cheap, mind you, but possible.

Disturbing.

 

[bill smith]

Bill, I pegged you as a Steven Jones zombie earlier. Just go.

Yes, but I at least have a fully consistent working theory from start to finish which is far more than can be said of you. But I am still open to correction which you are not. You are wedded to a theory that you make as clear as mud. I learned more in two posts from Telltale Tom than I learned from you in this entire 4.000 post thread.
I will continue to ask you questions as I see fit. Whether you answer or not is your own affair.

 

[starri]

That building was deconstructed.

I don't think that word means what you think it means.

 

[dafydd]

I don't think that word means what you think it means.

I pointed that out to her and she wished me and my parents to hell. That purple hair dye has deleterious effects on the brain.