• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

WTC dust

Status
Not open for further replies.
DGM said:
"nuke".

I think the submarine thing was a bit much also.

(I have to go for now, I'm building a gun case for my son, not surprising I'm sure......:D)
Click to expand...
I hear ya, I'm just looking at this thread while I'm waiting for glue to dry on the bar I'm building.
 
bill smith said:
Do you think The force from the mini-nuke could have run up through the building,pulverising the successive concrete floors without visibly blowing out the sides of the lower sections first ?
Click to expand...
Without the universe (as we know it) noticing? You do know the universe did not notice? Bill, please tell me you know this.

:eek:
 
DGM said:
"nuke".

I think the submarine thing was a bit much also.

(I have to go for now, I'm building a gun case for my son, not surprising I'm sure......:D)
Click to expand...

Must have been one of those non-nuclear nukes. You can always tell them because they don't look like a nuke or leave any evidence of a nuke that's how you can tell they're a nuke.
 
tsig said:
Must have been one of those non-nuclear nukes. You can always tell them because they don't look like a nuke or leave any evidence of a nuke that's how you can tell they're a nuke.
Click to expand...


Pesky little things these Invisa-nukes right? I was right in lower manhattan on and after 9/11, I haven't grown any extra limbs and my daughter born two years later didn't come out mutilated. Wow those nukeless nukes are so kind to people!

(wipes up the sarcasm drips)
 
bill smith said:
Do you think The force from the mini-nuke could have run up through the building,pulverising the successive concrete floors without visibly blowing out the sides of the lower sections first ?
Click to expand...

No. People whould have suffered from radiation sickness. To date, exactly 0 , none nada, zilch, amount of people have been treated for R.S.

Debunked on 9/12/01
 
Dash80 said:
Pesky little things these Invisa-nukes right? I was right in lower manhattan on and after 9/11, I haven't grown any extra limbs and my daughter born two years later didn't come out mutilated. Wow those nukeless nukes are so kind to people!

(wipes up the sarcasm drips)
Click to expand...

You have to have three kids in order to disprove any radiation effects... if you end up with one of each then you know that you have a problem. :eek:
 
NoahFence said:
"the" mini-nuke?

Well, I guess the answer to your question would be no, because there was no mini-nuke.
Click to expand...
I just love the way this nutjob just puts the arbitrary word mini infront of something to make that something as big or as small as they like.

A mini-nuke will take out a building, but a micro-nuke will only destroy your front room. A nano-nuke will only heat a cup of tea.

One of my favourite sites is this one. http://www.carloslabs.com/node/20

Just put "New York" into the search and then move the slider to the left to select a "mini-nuke" (suitcase bomb 1 kt) and then Nuke it!

Bill Smith - what size in kilotons or mega tons is your mini-nuke?
 
bill smith said:
Do you think The force from the mini-nuke could have run up through the building, pulverizing the successive concrete floors without visibly blowing out the sides of the lower sections first ?
Click to expand...

The buildings could not stand without their floors, Bill. They would have immediately begun collapsing from the bottom up.
 
Sunstealer said:
I just love the way this nutjob just puts the arbitrary word mini infront of something to make that something as big or as small as they like.

A mini-nuke will take out a building, but a micro-nuke will only destroy your front room. A nano-nuke will only heat a cup of tea.

One of my favourite sites is this one. http://www.carloslabs.com/node/20

Just put "New York" into the search and then move the slider to the left to select a "mini-nuke" (suitcase bomb 1 kt) and then Nuke it!

Bill Smith - what size in kilotons or mega tons is your mini-nuke?
Click to expand...

150 kilotons yield according to Dmitri.

I am more interested in what Dr.Blevins thinks aabout the similarity of her fumes rising from the ground and Dmitri's. He also describes 'fluffy' metallic dust which might be analagous to the Dr's 'foam-like' metallic dust.
 
bill smith said:
150 kilotons yield according to Dmitri.

I am more interested in what Dr.Blevins thinks aabout the similarity of her fumes rising from the ground and Dmitri's. He also describes 'fluffy' metallic dust which might be analagous to the Dr's 'foam-like' metallic dust.
Click to expand...

If you spent half as much time doing research, with proper tools, that you spend on crack pots, you wouldn't look so silly. Maybe you are a parody. If so, study Tell Tale Tom, he's good at it!
 
WTC Dust said:
This kind of stuff doesn't happen when a plane crashes into a building and starts it on fire. That kind of thing happens all the time, and the building survives. They put the fire out, and the building survives. It doesn't go poof. Just research the Bellaire Apts in New York City for a similar plane-hits-building story, and see for yourself.
Click to expand...
Considering that fires were burning merrily in 1,2, and 7 right up until the collapses, you're just using the usual Truther straw man of insisting planes couldn't do it, ignoring the fire. Or insisting that the fire couldn't have done it, ignoring the plane.

bill smith said:
Do you think The force from the mini-nuke could have run up through the building,pulverising the successive concrete floors without visibly blowing out the sides of the lower sections first ?
Click to expand...
I'm no architect, but I'd say...no. There's no way the hypothetical "force" could be transmitted up the building, save by the structure of the building itself. The building that said energy would be destroying. It hits the impact floors, runs into a bottleneck due to the destroyed columns, and, if anything, destroys out the floors below the impact, not the impact zone itself.

And then there's the little matter of a complete lack of the noticeable symptoms of radiation sickness, even in people who were inside the building during the collapse. And the fact that nuclear weapons aren't known for being unidirectional. The mini-nuke theory is bunkum, bill.
 
Sunstealer said:
I just love the way this nutjob just puts the arbitrary word mini infront of something to make that something as big or as small as they like.

A mini-nuke will take out a building, but a micro-nuke will only destroy your front room. A nano-nuke will only heat a cup of tea.

One of my favourite sites is this one. http://www.carloslabs.com/node/20

Just put "New York" into the search and then move the slider to the left to select a "mini-nuke" (suitcase bomb 1 kt) and then Nuke it!

Bill Smith - what size in kilotons or mega tons is your mini-nuke?
Click to expand...

"new york, world trade center" will center it right at ground zero. 1kt takes out City Hall, Trinity Church and the building where the video "What we saw"was shot from and 140 kt (it doesn't have a 150 kt setting) hits part of New Jersey. Of course that doesn't really prove anything because with New Jersey you might not be able to tell if it was nuked and it might even be an improvement... :D
 
bill smith said:
150 kilotons yield according to Dmitri.

I am more interested in what Dr.Blevins thinks aabout the similarity of her fumes rising from the ground and Dmitri's. He also describes 'fluffy' metallic dust which might be analagous to the Dr's 'foam-like' metallic dust.
Click to expand...
So did you have a play with the website I linked to? Did you nuke NY with a 150kt device? Now do you understand why it's ridiculous to even bring up a mini-nuke hypothesis, unless ofcourse it's for the lulz.

Dimitri sounds like he wouldn't know his arse from his elbow - you can tell people who don't have a clue because they use terms like "fluffy metallic dust" and "metallic foam". They've no clue.
 
Sunstealer said:
So did you have a play with the website I linked to? Did you nuke NY with a 150kt device? Now do you understand why it's ridiculous to even bring up a mini-nuke hypothesis, unless ofcourse it's for the lulz.

Dimitri sounds like he wouldn't know his arse from his elbow - you can tell people who don't have a clue because they use terms like "fluffy metallic dust" and "metallic foam". They've no clue.
Click to expand...

Steel turning in to foam... I almost wet myself laughing at that one. It's right up there with Judy Looney Wood's "Snowball" to describe the flowing debris clouds as the towers came down.
 
Dash80 said:
Steel turning in to foam... I almost wet myself laughing at that one. It's right up there with Judy Looney Wood's "Snowball" to describe the flowing debris clouds as the towers came down.
Click to expand...

Yea, but it's nowhere near as laughable as a 'scientist' declaring the dust uncontaminated after EIGHT YEARS of sitting in an alley in NYC. I doubt anybody could be that stupid.


:boxedin:
 
Sunstealer said:
So did you have a play with the website I linked to? Did you nuke NY with a 150kt device? Now do you understand why it's ridiculous to even bring up a mini-nuke hypothesis, unless ofcourse it's for the lulz.

Dimitri sounds like he wouldn't know his arse from his elbow - you can tell people who don't have a clue because they use terms like "fluffy metallic dust" and "metallic foam". They've no clue.
Click to expand...

I would point out the obvious fact that this particular nuclear detonation is purported to have taken place deep under the foundations of the buildings. 77 feet under the base floor of the Towers in fact. This would not have anything like the impact a classical atmospheric detonation would visibly have on the city. Watch the videos on the previous page for all the detail you need..

However I am not in this thread to discuss Dmitri Khalezov's explanation in depth beyond where certain statements of his may align themselves with those of Professor Blevins,
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom