Horatius
NWO Kitty Wrangler
- Joined
- May 9, 2006
- Messages
- 29,691
Apathoid,
I make my own claims...I present my own theories...and I back them up with evidence/facts/analysis - if someone wants to make their own claims or theories...then they can start a thread, and debate others about their claims and theories. It's not my job to prove or disprove other peoples' claims and theories....I need only back up my own claims and theories.
Thank you.
Okay, so let's see some evidence/facts/analysis for this:
Or this:
It's scientifically impossible for this type of vertical steel network to collapse downward in a sequential progression - top to bottom. (floor by floor)
Or this:
If the internal (horizontal floors) were removed with a pancaking, than at best, the core and perimeter columns, would fall over to the side...from instability...but they certainly wouldn't or couldn't collapse down upon themselves (telescoping) in a sequential progression from top to bottom without being cut with something like therma/ite.
Or this:
because the only thing that could have been is a pancake collapse.
Or this:
and now know - that a full pancake collapse is scientifically impossible on the WTC Towers
Five (5) bald-faced assertions with no facts, no analysis, no evidence, just your opinions based on nothing. And we know what the quality of your opinions is, right?
At the sake of sounding like a genius...you could hammer an asteroid from outer space straight down on one of the (undamaged) twin towers...and it would not cause a chain reaction of floor failures from top to bottom. If anything, it would drill the vertical columns into the ground like a nail.
You have lost the right to be taken seriously. If you want to regain it, you'll have to post some actual evience, facts or analysis of your above claims. And remember, youtube videos, "looks like" and cherry-picked misquotes don't count as evidence, facts or analysis.
