Carrot Flower King
Janitor of Lunacy
Not the thread topic.
Except it is, as they are interfering with how our society, which they are not part of, makes its own decisions, including about speech and actions.
Not the thread topic.
It is endlessly fascinating on this forum to see posters make wide generalizations purporting to support their particular positions based on a distortion of the facts of a singular incident.Praying silently in the wrong place is a crime in the UK.
You are not a free society. Don’t pretend you are.
What is so special about traffic? Don't pedestrians deserve equal protection from disruption?Praying silently, on a sidewalk, as long as he doesn't disrupt traffic, should always be legal.
Why was it necessary for him to pray outside an abortion clinic?Then it's not relevant. Unless you want to judge legal questions on the basis of biblical teachings, then there's no point in considering biblical teachings. And I'm pretty sure you don't want to judge legal questions on the basis of biblical teachings.
What is so special about traffic? Don't pedestrians deserve equal protection from disruption?
Tell us about Trump's rallies, where people wishing to present dissenting opinions are regularly barred and/or physically removed.You guys said Freedom of Speech is protected on public AND private property.
A quick scan of that doesn't seem to cover the act of stationary praying.![]()
Jaywalking - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
If they are only against abortions for themselves, yes. If they are against them for others? No.Its not bigotry to be anti-abortion.
Some extremely wonderful and intelligent people oppose abortion.
Exactly. The fact that there was prayer involved is totally irrelevant to the case. And yet posters here keep harping on the praying as if it somehow mattered.Then it's not relevant. Unless you want to judge legal questions on the basis of biblical teachings, then there's no point in considering biblical teachings. And I'm pretty sure you don't want to judge legal questions on the basis of biblical teachings.
Tell us about Trump's rallies, where people wishing to present dissenting opinions are regularly barred and/or physically removed.
No, it's a response to your query about the relative rights of pedestrians and traffic.A quick scan of that doesn't seem to cover the act of stationary praying.
Nonsense.If they are only against abortions for themselves, yes. If they are against them for others? No.
Whataboutism, is a poor rebuttal.Tell us about Trump's rallies, where people wishing to present dissenting opinions are regularly barred and/or physically removed.
It's on a publicly owned and maintained sidewalk.Why was it necessary for him to pray outside an abortion clinic?
Is it necessary for him to pray on every publicly owned and maintained pavement?It's on a publicly owned and maintained sidewalk.
Kewl. And you're wrong.Nonsense.
Not intended as a rebuttal.Whataboutism, is a poor rebuttal.
Oh look, more calls for censorship. How very English.Not intended as a rebuttal.
To the OP - Get your own house in order before you criticize others for doing the same things.
Kool.Kewl. And you're wrong.