Woo of the Week

[Badly Shaved Monkey]

Sure, and she can ignore it and not be censured just the same way they all do. One day we may persuade our regulatory bodies to get their heads out of the sand. Maybe.

Rolfe.

Oh, that's sand, is it? Looked kinda brown and puckered to me.

 

[moopet]

I just *had* to sign up for otherhealth.com

 

[Rolfe]

For sheer irony, I quite like Manish Bhatia's second post in this thread: http://www.hpathy.com/homeopathyforums/forum_posts.asp?TID=3598

To be fair, his responses make sense in homoeopathic terms, and they're not dangerous. You can't say that about these guys very often.

Rolfe.

 

[brodski]

To be fair... snip...

but why be fair to this gaggle of fools and frauds? that's no fun at all.

 

[Rolfe]

Damnit, we have a late, third, entry. It's Sheri Nakken again;

http://www.hpathy.com/homeopathyforums/forum_posts.asp?TID=3599

Just the title of the thread should be enough for her to win the prize.

Come on, people- vote soon, vote often . Who is it to be?

I KNEW this was an invalid entry! BSM, look back at your own OP on this thread, from a couple of weeks ago. http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=1230724#post1230724

This is the IDENTICAL post, but at Otherhealth rather than H'pathy. I'm sure the 1976 revision of Ebbutt's 1962 appendix makes it quite clear that woos are not allowed to re-enter with an identical re-post.

Rolfe.

 

[Badly Shaved Monkey]

I KNEW this was an invalid entry! BSM, look back at your own OP on this thread, from a couple of weeks ago. http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=1230724#post1230724

This is the IDENTICAL post, but at Otherhealth rather than H'pathy. I'm sure the 1976 revision of Ebbutt's 1962 appendix makes it quite clear that woos are not allowed to re-enter with an identical re-post.

Rolfe.

Fair point. Spamming is cheating.