TFian
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2010
- Messages
- 1,226
Have you read the limits of growth and the criticism against it?
I've read much of the latest rendition yes.
Have you read the limits of growth and the criticism against it?
One of the dangers of global warming is that the British Isles and the western end of continental Europe will be plunged into a new ice age. There's a current called the North Atlantic Conveyor - the surface component of which is the Gulf Stream. It's what keeps Britain habitable.What do you mean by Dam the Ob river? How will this be a solution?
It doesn't matter whether I like the conclusions; it matters whether they are backed up with evidence. So far your failure rate there is 100%.I'm pretty sure the melting of the polar caps will have a much more devastating effect than just on coastal areas. In fact I have an interesting book on this very subject, though I'm sure you won't like the conclusions.
For crying out loud, the whole thing is made up! He says so repeatedly. It's not a model or a survey or a theory, it's just garbage.How did he make it all up? What anecdote?
One of the dangers of global warming is that the British Isles and the western end of continental Europe will be plunged into a new ice age. There's a current called the North Atlantic Conveyor - the surface component of which is the Gulf Stream. It's what keeps Britain habitable.
In the North Atlantic, north and west of Ireland, the warm Gulf Stream waters finally cool, sink, and flow back the other way. If there's too much fresh water flowing into the North Atlantic - from melting ice, and from the flows of the Siberian rivers, which are forecast to increase by 50% this century as the climate of the whole region shifts - then the water will be too light to sink and Conveyor will shut down and Britain will freeze.
So, mitigate that by sending the overflowing Ob back down into arid Central Asia.
You have to know this kind of stuff if you want to predict certain doom.
It doesn't matter whether I like the conclusions; it matters whether they are backed up with evidence. So far your failure rate there is 100%.
For crying out loud, the whole thing is made up! He says so repeatedly. It's not a model or a survey or a theory, it's just garbage.
It doesn't. It addresses one part of the problem.Sounds interesting, but how will this address the entire planet?
In what way?Also sounds very dangerous.
I can believe the story about the irrationally tight-fisted employer. They exist. That's the anecdote part. The rest of the story he makes up is based on that.Well I don't think he made up that his family member used an icebox instead of a fridge...
To be brief, I was speaking of health issues involving our diet and stress levels which are directly involved with civilization... ADHD, autism, and depression also involve civilization.
You didn't follow the link.
Early (pre-agriculture, pre-city) humans wiped out huge numbers of species. If you ever wondered where all those large land animals went, well, we ate 'em.
You can't prove that, the rates of such things are likely to have been constant throughout history, they just used to hide and kill most people with such disorders. ADHD would not have as much of an impact in non industrial societies, depression existed as long as we have records of people's behavior. Autism was mainly labeled as ‘retardation’.
You are sadly mistaken, sometimes people in agrarian societies just kill people with disabilities.
Autism is a developmental disability BTW.
But isn't there the possibility global climate change will reduce the carrying capacity of earth?
Sure the impact on rainfall could be devastating, even though some marginal areas will be warmer, the growing seasons will be too short.
High temps are drought can wreck the agricultural production, which is why some people suggest we need to start reducing carbon emissions.
Well to be fair, a number of autistics are pretty close to being retarded. So I can understand the mistake.
Since when did I say otherwise?
So?
So you have yet to demonstrate that modern civilization causes any of these issues.
Probably not. I'm more worried about 2018 to 2030. We'll see what happens on 2011 though.
Seriously the effects of peak oil will not be that apparent for fifty years. If we consume as we are now, it will be very low by then.
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=6448128&postcount=931I didn't say they created such ailments, just increased them. Autism is likely largely a product of environmental settings, and not just genetics, for example.
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=6448128&postcount=931
Your statement here needs clarifying, diets do not casue mental illness, it can (poor nutition) lead to some developmetal issues.
Autism is associated with a number of events, it seems related to an overgrowth of neurons in some studies. it is very likely to be genetic in nature. It is not caused by vaccines or enviromental toxins (unless the dose is remarkably low).
No, autism is primarily genetic.I didn't say they created such ailments, just increased them. Autism is likely largely a product of environmental settings, and not just genetics, for example.
No, autism is primarily genetic.
Well, it's not just that there's no mechanism for vaccines to cause autism; it's not borne out by epidemiology either.http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=6448128&postcount=931
Your statement here needs clarifying, diets do not casue mental illness, it can (poor nutition) lead to some developmetal issues.
Autism is associated with a number of events, it seems related to an overgrowth of neurons in some studies. it is very likely to be genetic in nature. It is not caused by vaccines or enviromental toxins (unless the dose is remarkably low).
Well, it's not just that there's no mechanism for vaccines to cause autism; it's not borne out by epidemiology either.
As for environmental toxins - if that were the case, we'd have seen a marked decline over the last 40 years or so; we've been almost fanatical in eliminating every trace of toxic substances from our environment. Not that I'm saying this is a bad thing...
While it is primarily genetic, it isn't something simple like, say, Huntington's Chorea. If you have the specific genetic error that indicates Huntington's, you will develop the disease. With autism, there appears to be multiple genes involved, interacting in ways we are still exploring, and there may be environmental triggers as well. The vaccine hypothesis has been thoroughly debunked, but that doesn't rule out everything.Seems the causes may be somewhat complex. http://www.nature.com/neuro/journal/v9/n10/full/nn1770.html