I recommend reading the paragraph Less encouraging details emerge in the same article.
I recommend reading the paragraph Less encouraging details emerge in the same article.
It’s not middle class tax that is the issue. It’s inflation which disproportionately effects the poor.Tarriffs are consumption taxes. 25% tarriffs will all be passed on to consumers, not stockholders. It will take its toll on everything you buy that comes from outside the US. And US manufacturers will increase prices on goods because they can. This will be a soul crushing levy that will affect everyone. Especially those trying to get ahead.
US dollar suffers worst start to a year since 1973 over Trump tariff concern (New York Post, July 1, 2025)
The US dollar suffered its worst first-half decline in more than 50 years as fears over President Trump's tariff policies have driven down the world's principal reserve currency.
The greenback weakened 10.7% in the first six months of the year compared to a basket of currencies from major trading partners - the worst drop since 1973 when President Nixon stopped tying the dollar to the price of gold.
Especially those whose wage is the minimum wage or is set relative to the minimum wage.It’s not middle class tax that is the issue. It’s inflation which disproportionately effects the poor.
And the threat of Trump's tarrifs has led to much of the inflation because it is tanking the dollar. And the tarriffs increase the cost on everything we buy.It’s not middle class tax that is the issue. It’s inflation which disproportionately effects the poor.
I might have said this earlier in this thread, but Australia realised this in the 1970s. Our inefficient industries like clothing and car manufacturing were protected by massive tariffs. We got rid of them, re-employed workers in other industries and have never looked back. We haven’t had a recession for decades, are about number 13 in the world economic rankings and have the highest average retirement income in the world.And the threat of Trump's tarrifs has led to much of the inflation because it is tanking the dollar. And the tarriffs increase the cost on everything we buy.
Double whammy!
Tarriffs have never worked. And they won't work now.
To be fair, we also gave up our local vehicle manufacturing industry, and a very large percentage of our local steel-making capability. Our "value" in metals is the large lumps of Western Australia that we dig up, crush and ship to Asia for processing into useful product.I might have said this earlier in this thread, but Australia realised this in the 1970s. Our inefficient industries like clothing and car manufacturing were protected by massive tariffs. We got rid of them, re-employed workers in other industries and have never looked back. We haven’t had a recession for decades, are about number 13 in the world economic rankings and have the highest average retirement income in the world.
Tariffs are toxic.
In 1930, the United States passed the Smoot Hawley Tarriff Act. Look it up.I might have said this earlier in this thread, but Australia realised this in the 1970s. Our inefficient industries like clothing and car manufacturing were protected by massive tariffs. We got rid of them, re-employed workers in other industries and have never looked back. We haven’t had a recession for decades, are about number 13 in the world economic rankings and have the highest average retirement income in the world.
Tariffs are toxic.
Bueller?In 1930, the United States passed the Smoot Hawley Tarriff Act. Look it up.
Those people just need to sell some of the eight to ten farms they each own (since Trump insists there are at least two billion here in the US).Especially those whose wage is the minimum wage or is set relative to the minimum wage.
Correct. We got it rightTo be fair, we also gave up our local vehicle manufacturing industry, and a very large percentage of our local steel-making capability. Our "value" in metals is the large lumps of Western Australia that we dig up, crush and ship to Asia for processing into useful product.
Yeah, about that whole minimum wage thing...that's on the list to go, too. It'd be foolish to keep it once all those alligator concentration camps are doing labor for free. That's just common sense.Especially those whose wage is the minimum wage or is set relative to the minimum wage.
Be good to a put a sign up for the inmates to read when they are bused in, something pithy like "Work sets you free".Yeah, about that whole minimum wage thing...that's on the list to go, too. It'd be foolish to keep it once all those alligator concentration camps are doing labor for free. That's just common sense.
Don't be silly, it's about slavery, not extermination. Sometimes I feel people are just trying to look on the bad side!Be good to a put a sign up for the inmates to read when they are bused in, something pithy like "Work sets you free".
And now you cannot find a Smoot or Hawley in the shops, Smoot Hawley manufacturing was destroyed by the tarriffs, and the skills needed to make them are now a lost art.In 1930, the United States passed the Smoot Hawley Tarriff Act. Look it up.
Trump will bring all that back. People will be trained to fit lots of tiny little Smoots into every Hawley industry can produce, and they'll be turning them out like crazy, like nobody ever saw before. Best Smoot Hawleys in the world and people don't know that. It's a shame. It's going to be unbelievable.And now you cannot find a Smoot or Hawley in the shops, Smoot Hawley manufacturing was destroyed by the tarriffs, and the skills needed to make them are now a lost art.
As long as the incinerators are sited down the far end of the camp where they can't be seen.Be good to a put a sign up for the inmates to read when they are bused in, something pithy like "Work sets you free".
My guess is that ADP's guess is much more accurate than the government's.A private firm, ADP, estimated that US government figures would show a loss of 33,000 jobs in June. This prediction was widely reported. CNN was not wrong when it reported ADP's estimate, and was not wrong when, hours later, it reported the US government figures.
Maria Baltiromo of Fox News was reporting a more optimistic estimate of 95,000 jobs gained when someone showed ADP's estimate to her.
Both estimates were issued prior to the US government's release of its own preliminary figures. Baltiromo's mistake lay in relying upon expert guesstimates instead of waiting for the government to release its data.
Relying upon guesstimates instead of waiting for actual data is a mistake often made at ISF as well as Fox News.
Considering the government departments responsible for jobs stats have been heavily DOGEd and then loaded up with MAGA sycophants.My guess is that ADP's guess is much more accurate than the government's.