• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Wikileaks

bill smith said:
An answer from a previous Wiki thread will suffice..

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=6226652&postcount=48
Click to expand...

That post:


bill smith said:
.....Or I may have been right on the money.

'' Hidden Intelligence Operation Behind the Wikileaks Release of "Secret" Documents? ''
The real story of Wikileaks has clearly not yet been told.


http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=20580
Click to expand...


bill smith said:
And with that the proof is in. Wikileaks is an American operation..
Click to expand...



So, bill, enlighten us: in an era when anyone with a computer can make a website, why is it that the only people who have made a website devoted to publishing leaked government documents are some sort of "operation" intended to mislead people?

Don't you believe that some people in government might actually leak documents they feel the public should see? Don't you believe that there might be some people who actually believe those documents should be hosted on a website somewhere?

The technology behind a site like wikileaks is widely available, it takes only the desire to do it for anyone to do it. So why is it that you believe the only people who have done it are "in on it"?
 
Captain_Swoop said:
No mention of the ongoing operations to cover up the Moon Hoax either, that must involve more people than 9/11. We must be into the 3rd generation of conspirators there by now.
Click to expand...

Most Apollo material, if it still exists at all, is boxed in bulky containers, not in internet friendly format. Even if there were children and grand children of moon conspirators who are in the know, they wouldn't have much material to show.
 
little grey rabbit said:
One does have to admire the indefagitable Bradley Manning.

Is there any branch of government that this intrepid private was unable to penetrate?
Click to expand...

You'd be surprised at what a "dumb, knucklehead, slick sleeve, &%?&#! Private!" Can do.
 
So if you can find it on google it's true, and if you can't it's also true, but censored.

Mental gymnastics ROCK!
 
Horatius said:
That post:









So, bill, enlighten us: in an era when anyone with a computer can make a website, why is it that the only people who have made a website devoted to publishing leaked government documents are some sort of "operation" intended to mislead people?

Don't you believe that some people in government might actually leak documents they feel the public should see? Don't you believe that there might be some people who actually believe those documents should be hosted on a website somewhere?

The technology behind a site like wikileaks is widely available, it takes only the desire to do it for anyone to do it. So why is it that you believe the only people who have done it are "in on it"?
Click to expand...

You should have included the other part of that exchange. Read exerpt below.

'' So has the spectre been raised of Wikileaks actually being in cahoots with the Americans ?
I guess it's possible. After all the leaks that the government itself lets drop are highly suspect. What better than to have an apparent enemy leaking instead on your secret behalf. The credibility factor is so much higher.''

Do you have the picture now ?
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
I suggest that you look on Google.If you can't find it there very easily then it is being censored.
Click to expand...

You have lost your mind bill (Not like you ever had it to begin with though). This is part of the reason why I keep coming to this section of the forum. It's like going to a free comedy show.
 
bill smith said:
You should have included the other part of that exchange. Read exerpt below.

'' So has the spectre been raised of Wikileaks actually being in cahoots with the Americans ?
I guess it's possible. After all the leaks that the government itself lets drop are highly suspect. What better than to have an apparent enemy leaking instead on your secret behalf. The credibility factor is so much higher.''

Do you have the picture now ?
Click to expand...



None of that addresses the question I actually asked you. Sure, if there is some vast conspiracy, they could be engaging in the sorts of shenanigans you claim they are.

What I'm asking is, why isn't anyone else?

All it would take is two people: one person of honour to actually leak some documents, and another to post them. There's nothing so highly technical about any of this that you'd need some special training to do it, so why has no one else (other than "THEM") done so?
 
little grey rabbit said:
One does have to admire the indefagitable Bradley Manning.

Is there any branch of government that this intrepid private was unable to penetrate?
Click to expand...
The real question is, why haven't the Illuminati silenced this guy? There is only one possible explanation: They want these leaks to get out. We need to find out how this fits into their plans for global domination.
 
I've alerted the NWO Kitty and his silly little rabbit friend to the case.

He should be on it shortly.
 
Horatius said:
None of that addresses the question I actually asked you. Sure, if there is some vast conspiracy, they could be engaging in the sorts of shenanigans you claim they are.

What I'm asking is, why isn't anyone else?

All it would take is two people: one person of honour to actually leak some documents, and another to post them. There's nothing so highly technical about any of this that you'd need some special training to do it, so why has no one else (other than "THEM") done so?
Click to expand...

''The common wisdom is that "you can't keep secrets in Washington," and that someone always deliberately leaks or inadvertently blabs. But, says Ellsberg, who was privy to some of the most top-secret material for years, "the fact is that the overwhelming majority of secrets do not leak to the American public.

This is true even when the information withheld is well known to an enemy and when it is clearly essential to the functioning of the congressional war power and to any democratic control of foreign policy... Secrets that would be of the greatest importance to many of them can be kept from them reliably for decades by the Executive Branch, even though they are known to thousands of insiders."
 
Quad4_72 said:
You have lost your mind bill (Not like you ever had it to begin with though). This is part of the reason why I keep coming to this section of the forum. It's like going to a free comedy show.
Click to expand...

Well the Bush 2003 rape case is kind of off topic here. Otherwise I would prove it.
 
Last edited:
chipmunk stew said:
The real question is, why haven't the Illuminati silenced this guy? There is only one possible explanation: They want these leaks to get out. We need to find out how this fits into their plans for global domination.
Click to expand...

You seem to be smarter than the average debunker in that you can see what is right under your nose..
 
bill smith said:
You seem to be smarter than the average debunker in that you can see what is right under your nose..
Click to expand...

And you seem to be the dumbest of all the truthers, because you completely missed he was making a joke.

Oh, that and because you once seriously suggested the "new investigation" should be created as a reality show with call ins.
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
You seem to be smarter than the average debunker in that you can see what is right under your nose..
Click to expand...
No way, I'm bush league compared to the stable of ace shills. I've just been around long enough to be able to ape the Truther thought process somewhat convincingly, so I've been assigned to the mockery beat.
 
Let's not forget that 256-bit encryped file (like 2 gigs in size) that assange released called "insurance.ae256.zip." As long as that remains encrypted (presumably until Assange gets assassinated or whatever), truthers will always have something to point to and go "see? I bet I know what that is..."
 
chipmunk stew said:
No way, I'm bush league compared to the stable of ace shills. I've just been around long enough to be able to ape the Truther thought process somewhat convincingly, so I've been assigned to the mockery beat.
Click to expand...

Yea, the Mockery Department is a nice gig if you can get it.
 
bill smith said:
''The common wisdom is that "you can't keep secrets in Washington," and that someone always deliberately leaks or inadvertently blabs. But, says Ellsberg, who was privy to some of the most top-secret material for years, "the fact is that the overwhelming majority of secrets do not leak to the American public.

This is true even when the information withheld is well known to an enemy and when it is clearly essential to the functioning of the congressional war power and to any democratic control of foreign policy... Secrets that would be of the greatest importance to many of them can be kept from them reliably for decades by the Executive Branch, even though they are known to thousands of insiders."
Click to expand...



Interesting quoting there, bill....

http://books.google.ca/books?id=bQl...s do not leak to the American public.&f=false
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom