• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Wikileaks founder is "annoyed" by 9/11 conspiracy theories

Indeed, I am very fond of Maus, for example.

Actually I just use the term Illuminati as a placeholder.

If you prefer I could use "The Family - Unseen, Unknown, and Unheard" or how about "Running dogs of the Judeo-Bolshevist-Masonic Plutocracy"

?

Same difference,they are all imaginary too.Try reading real books.
 
So how do they get anything done?

The methodology is various described as "working towards the Fuehrer" or in a slightly longer formulation

What began in 1941 was a process of destruction not planned in advance, not organized centrally by any agency. There was no blueprint and there was no budget for destructive measures. [These measures] were taken step by step, one step at a time. Thus came about not so much a plan being carried out, but an incredible meeting of minds, a consensus -- mind reading by a far-flung bureaucracy.

You seem happy enough with this type of explanation in some contexts...
 
The methodology is various described as "working towards the Fuehrer" or in a slightly longer formulation



You seem happy enough with this type of explanation in some contexts...

Why didn't you post your holocaust-denying source?

What am I doing trying to have a reasonable discussion with a holocasut denier? I think I'll put you on ignore already. Have a nice life.
 
So has the spectre been raised of Wikileaks actually being in cahoots with the Americans ?

I guess it's possible. After all the leaks that the government itself lets drop are highly suspect. What better than to have an apparent enemy leaking instead on your secret behalf. The credibility factor is so much higher.

Except that all seems to have been dumped in favour of the short-term gain of heavily implicating Pakistan in anti-American activity. Action must be nigh.

Poor Julian may have been left out in the cold.

Or I could be completely wrong and wikileaks is the real McCoy.

So-- amazing flooding in Pakistan lately isn't there ? Any word from wikileaks
recently ? I hope they have not faded away.
 
So has the spectre been raised of Wikileaks actually being in cahoots with the Americans ?

I guess it's possible. After all the leaks that the government itself lets drop are highly suspect. What better than to have an apparent enemy leaking instead on your secret behalf. The credibility factor is so much higher.

Except that all seems to have been dumped in favour of the short-term gain of heavily implicating Pakistan in anti-American activity. Action must be nigh.

Poor Julian may have been left out in the cold.

Or I could be completely wrong and wikileaks is the real McCoy.

.....Or I may have been right on the money.

'' Hidden Intelligence Operation Behind the Wikileaks Release of "Secret" Documents? ''
The real story of Wikileaks has clearly not yet been told.


http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=20580
 
Last edited:
I'm not familiar with the Swiss system nor do I know whether there have been changes in the German one, but at least a few years ago, the degree the Germans call a doctorate was not a sufficient formal qualification for a professorship in a German university. Dr. Schmidt needed something called a Habilitationsschrift before he/she could turn into Prof. Dr. Schmidt.

In that sense, it's at least somewhat comparable to a U.S. Master's degree (which is also a post-graduate degree, unlike many of the pre-Bologna degrees that colloquially pass as Master's degrees in Europe), although I gladly concede your point that in terms of study and effort required, it's probably much closer if not equivalent to an American doctorate. And if I may follow your example and add a personal note, a friend of my wife's got her Master's degree from a local Finnish university and married a Bavarian man. When they moved to Munich, she found to her surprise that for the locals, she was not Frau So-und-So but Dr. So-und-So. (This happened over 15 years ago, so it was not only pre-Bologna but also pre-dated Finland's EU membership.)

Just for the record.... the German Dr. is in no manner comparable to a U.S. Master degree, it is rather comparable to what you call a Ph.D. with the difference that you don´t have any universitary courses at all, you just do studies on your own and maybe give courses at the University.

Nowadays in Germany most University offer Bachelor/Master careers but in the past there were only degrees one would finish within 5 years: "Diplom" and "Magister". So basically the Magister and the Diplom include already what in the U.S. is called "post-graduate studies".

To become "Professor" it´s a long way to take: First you have to finish your "Dissertation" first (3-4 years) which makes you a "Dr." and then you have to write a "Habilitationsschrift" which takes depending on your studies from 2-5 years. Then you will be a "PrivatdozentIn" or "Dr. habil." and will only become a Prof. if you get a "call" from any University or Institutions that can provide "Lehrstühle". Then he or she can call him or herself "Herr/Frau Prof." or "Herr/Frau Prof. Dr." (or even Prof. Dr. Dr. if you did two Dissertationen :D)

Way ago, maybe in the 50s and 60s, there was a time where people called the wife of a Professor "Frau Professor" or the wife of a Dr. "Frau Doktor". Fortunately this times are over and women can speak for themselves. The case you describe (a Master becoming a Doctor and then even transferring it to the women) is far from truth, even if a Doctors wife might be called "Frau Dr."... Bavaria is somehow still what they call "traditional".


I guess most of you are not interested in this stuff but I (as you I guess) don´t like half-knowledge and so I don´t want it to spread and prefer to put things in the right way.
 
Just for the record.... the German Dr. is in no manner comparable to a U.S. Master degree, it is rather comparable to what you call a Ph.D. with the difference that you don´t have any universitary courses at all, you just do studies on your own and maybe give courses at the University.

Nowadays in Germany most University offer Bachelor/Master careers but in the past there were only degrees one would finish within 5 years: "Diplom" and "Magister". So basically the Magister and the Diplom include already what in the U.S. is called "post-graduate studies".

To become "Professor" it´s a long way to take: First you have to finish your "Dissertation" first (3-4 years) which makes you a "Dr." and then you have to write a "Habilitationsschrift" which takes depending on your studies from 2-5 years. Then you will be a "PrivatdozentIn" or "Dr. habil." and will only become a Prof. if you get a "call" from any University or Institutions that can provide "Lehrstühle". Then he or she can call him or herself "Herr/Frau Prof." or "Herr/Frau Prof. Dr." (or even Prof. Dr. Dr. if you did two Dissertationen :D)

Way ago, maybe in the 50s and 60s, there was a time where people called the wife of a Professor "Frau Professor" or the wife of a Dr. "Frau Doktor". Fortunately this times are over and women can speak for themselves. The case you describe (a Master becoming a Doctor and then even transferring it to the women) is far from truth, even if a Doctors wife might be called "Frau Dr."... Bavaria is somehow still what they call "traditional".


I guess most of you are not interested in this stuff but I (as you I guess) don´t like half-knowledge and so I don´t want it to spread and prefer to put things in the right way.

An engineer's son might be called ''Der kleine engineer' or so I have heard.
 
You can probably say that but it is nothing common, actually I've never heard such a form, but still, possible. Taking the man's profession to associate it with other family members is a traditional thing and not commonly used for decades in most parts of Germany. I could imagine my grandmother talking like this but she was born in 1910 or sth, so.... :)
 
The SBS current affairs program Dateline did a very interesting report (I might be biased because I used to work on that show and I know the reporter Mark Davis) about this wikileaks bloke and the whole Afghanistan war diaries thing.

http://www.sbs.com.au/dateline/story/about/id/600572/n/The-Whistleblower

The video there won't play on my computer, not sure why, but in the report he certainly comes across as a thoughtful, intelligent, credible and totally genuine person who is doing what he believes is right for the common good. I can't imagine him falling for any of the 9/11 CTs that our Truther friends find so exciting.
 

Back
Top Bottom