Foster Zygote
Dental Floss Tycoon
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2006
- Messages
- 22,110
About 6 months away from that date, but sure!![]()
I think we need to air some grievances.
About 6 months away from that date, but sure!![]()
Why do I need to repent to a badly drawn character in a sub-par fiction novel?
It's also a classic case of the double standard that's applied to God's actions by believers, in that he is thanked for the beneficial ones but never blamed for the harmful ones. If he was responsible for the gulls, he must also have been responsible for the crickets.
Indubitably.I think we need to air some grievances.
There are two main commandments on which hang all the Law and the Prophets: Love the Lord with all your heart, mind, might, and strength; and Love your neighbor as yourself.
...Love is the Law.
Like all those children who were put to the sword by the righteous Hebrews when they took the promised land from the people who were already living there?*
*That never actually happened, but it's disturbing how many people think it's an historical account.
...commandments ... Love the Lord with all your heart, mind, might, and strength; ...
...
We need to repent now to be eligible for God's mercy....
Oh hey Billy. I talked to the mormons like you suggested. They didn't seem to have read the bible and weren't at all familiar with it. Is that typical for missionaries?
Why Is It Important Not To Procrastinate Repentance?
It is important that we don't procrastinate repentance because this life is the time given to us to prepare for eternity. We are eternal beings--we will all live forever, either in misery or in happiness, according to whether our works have been good or evil. If we do not improve our time during this "mortal probation," then comes the night "wherein no labor may be performed."
And the same spirit that possesses us, whether the devil or God, will have power to possess us in the afterlife. If our works have been evil, our reward will be spiritual death and endless misery. If our works have been good, our reward will be eternal life and endless happiness.
We need to repent now to be eligible for God's mercy. Mercy is for the penitent. If we don't repent, we are exposed to the whole law of justice and it is as if there has been no redemption made.
What do you say to someone like me, who cannot bring himself to believe in Gods or Devils, or the concept of eternal life?
What do you say to someone like me, who cannot bring himself to believe in Gods or Devils, or the concept of eternal life?
If your god had some part in the manufacture of my "soul", who's responsibility is it that I turned out this way?
Again, read Alma 32. That's your answer.
You're not the finished product, regardless of who's to blame. You can take or refuse the hand of Deity. Your choice.
They're teenagers.
Read Alma 32.
Again, read Alma 32. That's your answer.
...You can take or refuse the hand of Deity. Your choice.
Seems pointless. How is reading a work of fiction supposed to convince anyone that the supernatural exists?Read Alma 32.
It is very serious stuff in this forum. I have lost count of the number of posters who want me hung, drawn and quartered because I say atheists believe that there are no gods rather than atheists "lack belief" in gods.That's just semantic nonsense, because theists like to play word games.
Exactly! He doesn't say that he "lacks belief" in an afterlife. He positively declares that there is no afterlife.Roger Ramjets says that there is no afterlife
If "lack of belief" is synonymous with "disbelief" then why do so many posters here make so much noise about the distinction?Your response here is strange, to suggest that a lack of belief in an afterlife isn't a "lack of belief", and that it precludes him being an atheist, since the definition of atheism is "a lack of belief in a deity", not just "a lack of belief". Even stranger since he was demonstrating "a lack of belief" both in god and an afterlife.
Again, Roger doesn't claim a "lack of belief" in an afterlife. He positively declares that there is NO afterlife. You claim that there is no difference between the two positions (the only way that you can fault my post) but that makes you a minority of one.Which is exactly the position Roger Ramjets was taking in the first place, thus rendering your entire argument moot!