Details here.
By the way, in 1947, the UN condemned the Arab world for rejecting the peace plan, calling their invasion "armed aggression". Can you imagine the modern UN - the antisemitic dictators' debating club - doing the same today?
The author is quite right to say:
By the way, in 1947, the UN condemned the Arab world for rejecting the peace plan, calling their invasion "armed aggression". Can you imagine the modern UN - the antisemitic dictators' debating club - doing the same today?
The author is quite right to say:
There are endless debates about what it means to be "pro-Israel," and often enough these debates explore how hostility towards mainstream Israeli views can best be presented as "legitimate criticism" or "tough love." But there are few debates about what it means to be "pro-Palestinian." If some of the past UN events devoted to demonstrating the organization's solidarity with the Palestinians are anything to go by, vilifying Israel and denying the Jewish state's legitimacy is an integral part of a "pro-Palestinian" stance.
Last edited:
