• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Why is homosexuality wrong?

Many lesbians engage in anal sex with men. A lesbian is simply a woman who partakes in unnatural sexual activity with another female, plenty do however also engage in perverse heterosexual acts with males or at least did before they chose to become lesbians.

:jaw-dropp:confused::jaw-dropp:confused:

Dude, what kind of ****ed porno movie do you have running on a loop in your head??

Being the fag hag I am, I know a few gay men who do not engage in anal sex, and I know ZERO lesbians who have anal sex with gay men. Reeeally not what either side is into.

Isn't there some Biblical verse about sinful thoughts being as bad as commiting the sins? Someone help me out here.

I've stated it before and I will say it again... the whole anti-gay agenda comes down to buttsex. Nothing to do with procreation, God, sin, the family, or AIDS, even though they'll shout about it until their throats are raw. Nonono. Buttsex.
 
Isn't there some Biblical verse about sinful thoughts being as bad as commiting the sins? Someone help me out here.
Matthew 5:28

JHC said:
But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart.

Note, though, it says nothing about lusting after men.
 
An abomination is a behavior not a person and like a child born illegitmately, a mixed race person is not responsible for the sinful lifestyle choices of their parents.

Sorry to butt in, but are you calling "mixed-race" marriages "abominations"?
 
Last edited:
Sorry to butt in, but are you calling "mixed-race" marriages "abominations"?

I think that the issue in this case is that a man and woman of different races who marry each other are failing to Preserve The Sanctity of Racism.

Please understand that I am not promoting racism, I reject racism and all other forms of bigotry whether justified by a religious delusion or any other type of fairy tale-based intolerance.
 
I think that the issue in this case is that a man and woman of different races who marry each other are failing to Preserve The Sanctity of Racism.

Please understand that I am not promoting racism, I reject racism and all other forms of bigotry whether justified by a religious delusion or any other type of fairy tale-based intolerance.

So without breaching any rules, we can safely describe this person/abomination xenon ii diot as an out-and-out racist charged up with delusional religious bigotry? Or is that just a start?
 
Mark Siefert,

I said could *ONLY* be argued as wrong... meaning it's the only real argument I could even think of that a person could legitimately use. However I wouldn't say it was immoral, just from a darwinian standpoint it wouldn't be the best orientation to be.
 
First of all, I want to apologize to everyone for speakingout of turn. I just jumped in at random, and the first post I read was the one I'm quoting below. I just had to answer it, though I suspected the conversation had moved far along since then.

However, looking at the last couple posts, perhaps it's relevant after all.



If everyone married people of a different race, individual races would become extinct. Similary, if everyone "married" a person of the same sex the whole human species would become extinct. God obviously wanted there to be racial diversity otherwise why would he have created more than one race? The logical conclusion of race mixing is racial genocide and ethnic cleansing.

Xenon: It would seem to me that if everyone married people of a different ethnic background (I prefer that to race. "Human" is a race.), then yes, there would be less individual difference between the ethnicities. Your conclusion sucks, though. If everyone were of the same "race", how could ethnic cleansing occur? I can imagine the conversation....

Dictator: Let's kill everyone with dark skin.
Advisor: There aren't any, sir.
Dictator: Oh. Ok, then, let's kill everyone with slanted eyes.
Advisor: Um...problem there too, sir...
Dictator: Hmmm. People of Afro-euro-asian descent?
Advisor: No can-do, sir.
Dictator: Aw, hell. Let's just go bowling.
 
Heh. I predict that if we did mingle as "one" race, we would start differentiating ourselves individually. I predict that personal body modification such as tattoos, piercings, and maybe even small cybernetics might grow to be far more popular than ever. Of course, I'm biased, I kinda like cyberpunk/transhumanist stuff. ;)
 
Heh. I predict that if we did mingle as "one" race, we would start differentiating ourselves individually. I predict that personal body modification such as tattoos, piercings, and maybe even small cybernetics might grow to be far more popular than ever. Of course, I'm biased, I kinda like cyberpunk/transhumanist stuff. ;)

I dislike tatoos, piercings and the idea of small cybernetics installed in the body. Are you calling me a racist?
 
So without breaching any rules, we can safely describe this person/abomination xenon ii diot as an out-and-out racist charged up with delusional religious bigotry? Or is that just a start?

You are safely within the rules if you criticize what another person says, as I understand it.

When you proceed to discuss the lack of merits of a particular person you have descended to an ad hominem attack and may run afoul of policy.

To the extent that my understanding is correct, this seems completely fair and reasonable.

In an earlier post in this thread I classified a contribution from another participant as being an amazingly idiotic thing to say. I leave it to the reader to draw conclusions as to whether or not this also reflects my opinion of any participant in this discussion.

I make no claim that any Imaginary Bearded Sky Daddy will punish any person for making a Lifestyle Choice to spread intolerance, bigotry, and hatred in their name. Obviously a Sky Daddy would have to exist before it could act in any vengeful, all-loving, omniscient, spiteful and merciful way.
 
What many people, especially racists, fail to realize is that even if there was some giant breeding program to evenly mix all the genetic variables within the human species, that variability would not be lost. Aboriginal Australians alone have been found to posses 85% of the total genetic variability of the human species. Even if you took 100,000 of the whitest crackers, all certified members of the KKK, and transported them to some uninhabited planet that was hot and sunny like equatorial Africa, the genes for greater melanin concentrations contained within their genome would be selected for and many generations later all of their descendents would be as dark skinned as any Masai.
 
You are safely within the rules if you criticize what another person says, as I understand it.

When you proceed to discuss the lack of merits of a particular person you have descended to an ad hominem attack and may run afoul of policy.

To the extent that my understanding is correct, this seems completely fair and reasonable.

In an earlier post in this thread I classified a contribution from another participant as being an amazingly idiotic thing to say. I leave it to the reader to draw conclusions as to whether or not this also reflects my opinion of any participant in this discussion.

I make no claim that any Imaginary Bearded Sky Daddy will punish any person for making a Lifestyle Choice to spread intolerance, bigotry, and hatred in their name. Obviously a Sky Daddy would have to exist before it could act in any vengeful, all-loving, omniscient, spiteful and merciful way.

On reflection, my description of xenoniii's religious "beliefs" as "delusional" is possibly ad hominem, and certainly redundant. A better phrase might be "vomit-inducing".
 
It's wrong because homosexuals are in the minority. Duh.

Just like it's wrong to be left-handed or play the bagpipe.


Hrmm... both categories of which fit me... No wonder I've always respected people who are homosexual: apparently being a left-handed bagpipe player is a sin on the same level ;)

-Matt

PS - It's only wrong because it's feared. I don't understand *why* people fear it, but they do. Once you rid them of that fear, they no longer consider it a sin. Now, left-handed bagpipe players, on the other hand, we are to be feared. We're after you!
 
Hrmm... both categories of which fit me... No wonder I've always respected people who are homosexual: apparently being a left-handed bagpipe player is a sin on the same level ;)

-Matt

If you are already a left-handed bagpipe player you should consider making the Lifestyle Choice to be gay. You'd be absolutely assured of spending all of eternity with the most fashion conscious and fabulous gurlfriends there are.

Also I only need to recruit one more innocent heterosexual to the Gay Lifestyle in order to get my official Homosexual Agenda toaster oven. Just be sure to mention my user name when you join up so I get the credit for recruiting you.

Thanks Matt, and enjoy your new Lifestyle Choice.
 
Even if you took 100,000 of the whitest crackers, all certified members of the KKK, and transported them to some uninhabited planet that was hot and sunny like equatorial Africa, the genes for greater melanin concentrations contained within their genome would be selected for and many generations later all of their descendents would be as dark skinned as any Masai.

I'm going to ask for evidence for this. In fact, I demand you conduct this experiment. Several times if necessary... :D
 
I haven't stated that pants wearing women are worthy of death and I haven't told those of mixed race that they are abominations. An abomination is a behavior not a person and like a child born illegitmately, a mixed race person is not responsible for the sinful lifestyle choices of their parents. I don't want anyone dead, I want those that are living in sin to repent so they may be saved, receiving from the Creator the awesome gift of eternal life. Everyone has the opportunity to repent of their sins and be saved no matter who they are including the homosexual and it is out of love not hate that I preach this message.

I will have to review the original thread, but you have indeed stated, I am pretty sure, that those of mixed race should not be born, because they are contrary to god's will. You have certainly made it plain both through statements and innuendo that you believe interracial marriage is an actual abomination. You have also stated that homosexuals are deserving of death. What the hell do you think that statement actually means? It does not mean that they deserve punishment from god when they die. It means that you believe that they ought to die, that if justice were served, they would be killed. That is what that statement means, and if you do not understand that, then you are a liar and a fool as well as a bigot.

Perhaps I have not made myself clear enough here, so I will make myself as clear as I possibly can. I am certainly willing to tolerate all sorts of bizarre and even hateful ideas, without calling their holder names, but there are limits. I don't want to invoke Godwin's law if I can help it, and am old enough to remember the McCarthy-era roots of the argumentum ad anam (if it walks like a duck, etc.), but there comes a point where those ideas are so odious, their expression so loathsome, and their target so personal, that they must be seen as representing your character.

So let me make myself very clear here, so you understand where I'm coming from.

My daughter, whom I love and respect, is a lesbian. Do you, Xenon, avow that she (not in the abstract, but she, the person) deserves death? Your statements cause me deep personal offense. Stand by what you mean. Retract it or tell it straight.

My wife, whom I love and respect, and to whom I have been married for 19 years without snarky, disgustingly innuendo-ridden quotation marks, is Cuban born. Now her Catalan ancestry suggests to me that she's not a different race, but she surely is Hispanic. You have stated that such persons should not be in this country, and that they are harmful to our culture. Do you, Xenon, not in the abstract, but to the person, stand behind what you have said? Retract it or tell it straight.

My sister in law, whom I love and respect, and who is, by the way, a hard working teacher, honored by her peers and beloved by her students, is a half black Mexican. According to your statements of record, she should not have been born. Her very existence is an affront to god, and she should not be in this country either. Do you, Xenon, not in the abstract, but to the person, stand by what you have said? Retract it or tell it straight.

Her children, whom I love and respect, are, of course, of mixed race too. What of them? These are real people in the real world. Do you stand by what you say? Retract it or tell it straight.

My sister once loved a black man. As it happens, she did not marry him, and she's now dead so cannot defend herself, but in a time not so long ago that we can afford to forget it, she marched, stood firm, went to jail (nine times, as I recall), was beaten and injured, for principles of justice and humanity that you deride, but that she held dear, and I hold as the highest principles, not just in her memory, but because these are ideas and ideals I hold as sacred as anything. Do you, Xenon, now and to me, stand by what you have said? Retract it or tell it straight. Let us see what you are actually made of.

OK, so I tried not to bring in Godwin's law, but I cannot help but be reminded of a story told by a man who was not only a personal friend but one of my intellectual heroes, the philosopher Hans Jonas. Dr. Jonas was a Jew, living in Germany, during the 1930's. One day, he took a date out to a mountain bistro, and while there, a group of soldiers came in, and broke into the "Horst Wessel" song, or one similar, calling, among other things, for the destruction of the Jews. He stood up, and yelled out, "stop singing that song! It offends me!" Surprised, perhaps by the boldness of it, but also perhaps by the fact that they had not thought of those ideas in the particular, they stopped. But young Jonas also realized that one day they would not, and that he and his temper could no longer safely coexist with them. He left Germany, and unlike most of the rest of his family, survived.

So now I will say to Xenon, stop. You offend me.
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom