Why Europe Hates israel

[Ion]

Gotta give it to Ion, if you can't baffle them with brains baffle them with bulls**t.

Here's some choice reading for you about the so-called relationship between Jordan and the PLO Ion.
...

And there is more choice reading that I have done myself.

The bottom line is that Israel is in non-Israel land -per U.N.- which is a breach of Israel signing with U.N..

Quod Erat Demonstratum.

 

[shuize]

Hey, Ion

How about that Lance Armstrong, huh?

When are your countrymen going to get around to winning their own bicycle race again?

 

[armageddonman]

Do you think they should have?

No, I do not think that stealing land is right.

Previously you asked why they didn't naturalize the people. Do you think they should have annexed the land without naturalizing the people?

As I said, I do not think that stealing land is right.

That however, does not answer the question why Israel did not annex the land. If Israel does not want to annex the land, why does it occupy it?

What significance do you attach to it?

Israel is aware that the occupied territories do not belong to Israel.

 

[BillyTK]

So have we reached a conclusion as to why Europe hates srael yet? I'd really like to know so, as I live off the north-west coast of Europe, I can meet my European obligations. Thank you.

 

[armageddonman]

So have we reached a conclusion as to why Europe hates srael yet? I'd really like to know so, as I live off the north-west coast of Europe, I can meet my European obligations. Thank you.

Actually we haven't even established that Europe hates Israel.

 

[Chaos]

Actually we haven't even established that Europe hates Israel.

No need to establish that. "Skeptic" and Z-N say it is so, therefore it is so.

Quod erad demonstrandum.



Note to "Skeptic" and Z-N: Yes, this was sarcastic, and, yes, I think your constant accusations of anti-semitism thrown at anyone who disagrees with you exhibit, at best, stupidity, and at worst, some serious mental problem.

 

[zenith-nadir]

No need to establish that. "Skeptic" and Z-N say it is so, therefore it is so. Quod erad demonstrandum. Note to "Skeptic" and Z-N: Yes, this was sarcastic, and, yes, I think your constant accusations of anti-semitism thrown at anyone who disagrees with you exhibit, at best, stupidity, and at worst, some serious mental problem.

Ahhh, hate to rain on your parade Chaos but I rarely, if ever, play the anti-semitic card. Anyone can read this thread and see that I have not used the words anti-semetic to describe Europe or anyone "who disagrees with you exhibit". Yet you claim I did, and then go further and call me stupid because of it. Now that is really stupid if you ask me. Sona si Latine loqueris.

 

[Chaos]

Oh my. I am so devastated that I misstated your modus operandi. (more sarcasm!)

It´s a fact that you and Skeptic are not the only, but two of the most vocal people on this board who constantly implicitly or explicitly

- equate criticism against Israel with anti-semitism
- equate the assertion that Palestinians are indeed human beings with "loving terrorists"
- state that "Europe hates Israel" because most Europeans do not agree with Mr. Sharon and his policies
- suggest that every Palestinian (and maybe every Muslim) is a (actual or potential) terrorist
- and so on...

"Skeptic", at least, sometimes does some good posts about topics that do not touch the Israeli/Palestinian issue. You, on the other hand...

 

[zenith-nadir]

Oh my. I am so devastated that I misstated your modus operandi. (more sarcasm!)

So now I don't call people anti-semites but I have a "modus operandi" whereby I;

Originally posted by Chaos constantly implicitly or explicitly- equate criticism against Israel with anti-semitism...

Wrong.

Originally posted by Chaos constantly implicitly or explicitly- state that "Europe hates Israel" because most Europeans do not agree with Mr. Sharon and his policies...

Wrong again.

Originally posted by Chaos constantly implicitly or explicitly- equate the assertion that Palestinians are indeed human beings with "loving terrorists"...

Gee, and here I thought I used the words "civilians" and "islaomofascists" to make the distinction, but alas who am I to argue with the modus operandi you have created for me...

Originally posted by Chaos constantly implicitly or explicitly- suggest that every Palestinian (and maybe every Muslim) is a (actual or potential) terrorist...

So civilian and islaomfascist are interchangable words which don't actually mean civilian or islamofascist, they mean "every Palestinian (and maybe every Muslim) is a (actual or potential) terrorist"...

Originally posted by Chaos "Skeptic", at least, sometimes does some good posts about topics that do not touch the Israeli/Palestinian issue. You, on the other hand

So not only do you create modus operandi for people at JREF you also are a critic and the content police. Just one question Chaos, who pissed in your Corn Flakes this morning?

 

[Ion]

Hey, Ion

How about that Lance Armstrong, huh?

When are your countrymen going to get around to winning their own bicycle race again?

Hey, shuize.

Look in my profile to see where I am from, because you confuse me with the French.

As for Lance Armstrong, that's phenomenal.

However, check www.infidels.org in the section 'Media & Popular Culture', to learn about many takes on this feat.