Why does FAA/Norad animation show NoC flightpath?

[Caustic Logic]

Caustic: Very nice.

What do the CIT and Pfffft boys claim those "aberrant returns" are?

Say, the CIT boys have been awful quiet lately. Maybe they are upset that their latest video dropped like a rock, never to be heard from again?

Thanks! I'm not sure of their overall takes, and I forget if Farmer had a thought, but CIT tried once to use them to say radar supported NoC. I had to explain how it couldn't be the plane as it had gone well below coverage. (ATS thread)

There's some good debate in the comments under my two latest FF posts. If ya need a fix.

Good summary.

I'm going to go out on a limb and speculate that the last two bizarre radar returns, apparently from after impact, are false echoes induced by the impact itself. Upon collision, a huge thermal plume laden with shredded aluminum and other reflective debris was thrown up, and this is quite likely to produce a confusing radar return.

We appear to see something similar in the final moments of AA 11, and this erroneous reading seems to have led the 9/11 Commission to overestimate the impact time at WTC 1 by several seconds.

Good research over there. You say "I speculate that the final return wasn't from the aircraft at all, but instead from the huge cloud of debris that emerged after impact -- pieces of aircraft, aluminum cladding from WTC 1, and the thermal bubble, all spreading to create a much larger and brighter radar reflector than the aircraft itself." That makes more sense at WTC since the plume originated at nearly 1000 feet up or so, so nut much below radar coverage. At the pentagon, it came from the ground. I can't say if this is right, but something I thought of was how they frame the Pentagon west area N and South, perhaps some inserted markers to say "it ended somewhere between here." Can/would they do that?

Good summation as well on the anomaly-philes. We've seen the depths they'll go to even pretending to have found holes in the narrative.