RussiaToday video:
History WW2 version 2.0
British court historian prof.
Richard Overy is shifting goalposts; here is a summary of what he says...
- Sure, Versailles is the cause of WW2...
- Hitler wanted a small war...
- He wanted to show western powers that they could not do with Germany as they please...
- Agrees with notion that Hitler thought that with the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact Britain and France would stay out of the war...
- Britain and France saw Poland as 'worthy ally' and underestimated Red army...
- Confirms the Soviet strategy of letting western powers beat each other to pulp so the USSR could intervene and bolshevize Europe...
- Western powers never really 'appeased' Hitler...
- The Poles were absolute convinced they could stand up to Hitler...
- The Poles vastly underestimated German strength, even thought they cold march towards Berlin...
- The invasion was not a surprise to anyone. French and British intelligence knew everything in advance; yet they hoped they could deter Hitler...
- Chamberlain never really wanted war and had hoped until the very last moment it would not happen, yet was determined to honor the guarantee to the Poles...
- British and French were calculating with a war just like WW1 that would last years; they were curiously fighting the last war, where the Germans were fighting the next war...
- Downplays the role of UK and US in winning the war, it was basically the USSR doing the heavy lifting; people did not want to know that because the USSR had grown into an enemy during the cold war...
On a positive note, this court historian operates on a far higher knowledge level as my esteemed opponents here. He acknowledges Versailles as the cause of WW2, confirms that Britain/France but not Germany wanted war, he dismisses that Poland was attacked in a surprise move and that USA/UK were Johnny-come-latelies and were not decisive in winning the war.
What he does not yet say, but does not deny it either, is that the war guarantee was the work of the Israel Lobby of those days (Focus group around Churchill, funded by international Jewry), he keeps alive the myth that anybody was interested in the fate of Poland (in reality France/Britain/USA/Russia saw Poland as a sack of potatoes to be thrown in a corner as it suited them, proof: Jalta). In reality France/Britain were still playing the old European balance of power game in their desire in keeping Germany down, where USA and USSR were preying on Europe to incorporate it in their globalist designs, Britain and France were merely usuful idiots in their perspective. France and Britain thought they could pull a Versailles 2.0 on Germany, that was their sole motivation. Hitler calculated that Britain/France would not act stupedly and would not commit suicide. Hitler was wrong.
But nevertheless, this is a remarkeble shift, he definitely is getting there and a clear sign that revisionism is winning.
Remember, this is Russia Today.
Unlike my esteemed opponents, the Russians are beyond bolshevism (meaning wanting to subjugate the entire planet and rule it from either Moscow or Washington with some Jewish invented tyrannical egalitarian ideology and branding it with a nice name: 'benevolent hegemony') and start to understand that the current big bully Anglosphere (lead by Israel) can be floored with revisionism in a joint European/Russian/Islamic(Iran!)/Chinese coalition, without the necessity of firing a shot, using the internet. Revisionism will indeed prove to be what Horst Mahler calls the poor man's nuke. It will not last long before Russia will let go of the last WW2 lies and hit the US mid ship by telling the truth about the H-word. In this way we can restore European grandeur from Paris via Berlin to Moscow, that was destroyed by the USSR/USA in 1945. My opponents here are fighting the previous war. They fail to understand the new reality and power of the internet. They are playing the game of musical chairs, failing to find a new seat to sit on in time. And since they refuse to sit on the new revisionist chair they have condemned themselves to have a life as glamourous as that of a
securitate agent in 1989. Hitler wanted a European dominated world, realized via a glorious alliance with Britain, where Germany would dominate continental Europe and Britain the rest of the world, as the latter had done until 1939. What Hitler failed to see was that Britain in 1939 was no longer ruled by the Brits but had been corrupted by international Jewry and had morphed into a tool representing Jewish interests and no longer that of the British population.
These poor British veterans will never get it. They think that during WW2 they fought for British interests and as a consequence fail to understand what happened to their country after they 'won'. What these suckers really did was helping the Jews to victory, by helping to defeat the only political entity intelligent enough to see who the real enemy was and strong enough to act upon this insight. Britain failed to see it, although there were voices like that of
Archibald Maule Ramsay in Britain who told the truth (was 5 years in jail) or
Charles Lindbergh in the US (destroyed by the Jewish owned press). And
Tyler Kent, who really was in the know, did not get a chance to tell the world what was going on. He was put in jail by Churchill as well.
It does not matter anymore. The picture has completely changed. The Jews have lost the war before it even began.
They lost Russia (guess
who opposes the continued imprisonment of the world's most dangerous International Jew?), which now holds the key to deliver the final blow by opening up their WW2 archives. The Jewish information monopoly has evaporated thanks to The People's CIA, the internet. China is rising and not integratable in any NWO design dreamed up in Washington. In contrast, the reemerging White World centered around the future Paris-Berlin-Moscow axis (
to which Moscow holds the key) will have to do it's utmost to prevent a Chinese NWO after the downfall of America. In order to do this we Europeans must prey on America and reincorporate it in the European World at the first opportunity. That opportunity could rise a) from a Washington power vacuum after 9/11 truth comes out or b) after an escalated conflict between the US and China, for instance over Korea.
