Who started both World Wars?

[SanityGap]

So you are from 'An island off Europe', probably Britain, right? That means that I have to explain to you a documentary in your own language by your own Bolshevik Broadcasting Coorperation.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=270975414048677528#

Now take the time to watch the last 3 minutes of this documentary to learn who, according to the BBC, knew in advance what was about to happen.

If you have any trouble understanding English, just ask. After all we are here to help you.

The word used is "suggests" not "proves". The evidence given is at best proof of incompetence and some stupid, but not pre-planning.

For the record this was a BBC production in assosiation with Warner. The research, direction etc was not by them In fact the writing and research was by George Morgenstern and Robert Stinnet. Guess which sort of web sites they tend to crop up on.
None of what you heard was "according" to the BBC anymore than Amazon is expressing it's views in the books it sells. What were you saying about understanding?

 

[Hans]

Any lurker coming here will see 9/11 repeatedly being corrected, shown to be wrong, being a liar, challenged to respond - and he doesn't ----one of the perils of putting people on ignore is that they can demolish your kooky thinking so that all can see....<smile>

 

[SanityGap]

Now that we are at it making fun of the British, this morning I learned something new about 'the miracle of Dunkirk'.

Until now I had thought that Hitler had let the British escape in order not to ruin chances of some agreement with them. Well and maybe he would have let the British escape... if he only got the chance to display his goodwill. The truth is even more painful for the British. Here David Irving on a recent lecture:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WYGcMqMd128&feature=related

In reality the British were fleeing. Irving: "this was the only occasion that British arrived on a beach before the Germans."
(0:48, laughter in the audience)

The bitter truth is that the Germans never realised that the British were embarking... because the Germans had not expected the British to flee. And neither did their allies the French and the Belgians, the British simply abandoned them without warning!

Again a typical display of German overestimation of the British.

It is well documented that they were in mass retreat, it's not something just discovered. The BEF were totally unprepared for Blitskreig.
They did not abandon anyone. Read some history. Not Irving.

 

[Tolls]

And yet it took 9 days to complete the evacuation. You'd have thought that at some point in time the Master Race might have cottoned on to the fact that there was quite a lot of maritime traffic and that the number of people on the beach was getting smaller and smaller.

Considering the Luftwaffe was attacking the beaches from day 1 of the evacuation, unless Irving thinks the Luftwaffe consisted of complete imbeciles, I think it's fair to say that Irving does not have a clue what he's talking about.

To be fair, the British did bring about 140,000 house guests back with them.

Not only that, the French command had said that the British should have priority. It was Churchill, a couple of days in, who gave the order that it should be first come first served thus meaning more than a third of the evacuated troops were French.

 

[twinstead]

Any lurker coming here will see 9/11 repeatedly being corrected, shown to be wrong, being a liar, challenged to respond - and he doesn't ----one of the perils of putting people on ignore is that they can demolish your kooky thinking so that all can see....<smile>

Even though I don't do it, I suppose there are instances when the ignore function is viable. The only issue is that since everybody else can see the all the posts, one runs the risk of making it appear that the ignore function is being used as a dissent silence mechanism instead of tuning out an idiot.

Well, lurkers, what is the general consensus as to why 9/11 is putting people on ignore?

 

[Dave Rogers]

Now that we are at it making fun of the British, this morning I learned something new about 'the miracle of Dunkirk'.

"Learning something new" appears to be a frequent pleasure for the shockingly ignorant.

The bitter truth is that the Germans never realised that the British were embarking... because the Germans had not expected the British to flee. And neither did their allies the French and the Belgians, the British simply abandoned them without warning!

Some one must have warned the 140,000 Frenchmen who were evacuated by the Royal Navy, surely?

Let me guess: 9/11-investigator never knew that over 40% of the troops evacuated from Dunkirk were French? Well, maybe our resident Dutch Nazi has just learned something else new.

Dave

 

[SanityGap]

"Learning something new" appears to be a frequent pleasure for the shockingly ignorant.



Some one must have warned the 140,000 Frenchmen who were evacuated by the Royal Navy, surely?

Let me guess: 9/11-investigator never knew that over 40% of the troops evacuated from Dunkirk were French? Well, maybe our resident Dutch Nazi has just learned something else new.

Dave

He probably knows but his agenda gets in the way.

 

[Tolls]

"Learning something new" appears to be a frequent pleasure for the shockingly ignorant.

Some one must have warned the 140,000 Frenchmen who were evacuated by the Royal Navy, surely?

Let me guess: 9/11-investigator never knew that over 40% of the troops evacuated from Dunkirk were French? Well, maybe our resident Dutch Nazi has just learned something else new.

Dave

Just as he doesn't know that Admiral Darlan (I'll leave it up to 911 to figure out who he was) suggested that the French army acted as rearguard while the BEF evacuated. Darlan knew that the French forces, even if evacuated, would simply be repatriated, probably into POW camps, so evacuating them would likely be a waste of resources. Churchill, however, knew that the PR of joint evacuation was far more important in what would likely be a long war, so overuled him.

 

[SanityGap]

I have now a raw version of my announced blog: http://20thcentury-blog.blogspot.com

Within that blog here is all the material about Pearl Harbour:

http://20thcentury-blog.blogspot.com/#pearlharbor

*** WARNING ***

The blog includes a traffic counter, which displayes location, operatings system and screen resolution of the person who clicks the link. As a consequence of clicking on the link immediately small groups of Neonazis with portable gas chambers will swarm over Anglosphere and take appropiate action against the person question.

Happy reading!

Nice smiley picture of Herr Leader? Check.
Lots of irrelevant references to Joos? Check.
Absolute pile of steaming? Check

 

[dtugg]

I think that I am on the nazi's ignore list. I take it as a compliment.

 

[Hans]

Just a historical note: While the majority of the British army had to withdraw at Dunkirk. A force remained with the French and didn't withdraw until June after the German attacked to the south. The main unit in this force was the 51st Division. Two brigades were captured and one returned to England.

There were also four divisions of Polish troops in France during 1940

 

[Tolls]

I think that I am on the nazi's ignore list. I take it as a compliment.

It's hard to tell sometimes. He ignores so much stuff as a matter of course.

 

[9/11-investigator]

LOL I have a rule to NEVER put anybody on ignore. You have a rule to put anybody who asks questions you can't answer on ignore.

I like you twinstead. Your 'insults' have this velvet quality about them. So you are saying that I am putting the vast majority not on ignore because I am graciously able to handle all their points?

A big thank you!!

Are you a woman as your avatar suggests?

 

[9/11-investigator]

It's hard to tell sometimes. He ignores so much stuff as a matter of course.

That is true, but you must realize that my days have 24 hours, just like yours. And since it is one Red Pimpernel (me) against hordes of Neo-Jacobins (you) it can sometimes happen that one of you does not get a Behandlung.

We seek him here, we seek him there,
Those Frenchies seek him everywhere.
Is he in heaven?—Is he in hell?
That demmed, elusive Pimpernel.

 

[Tolls]

That is true, but you must realize that my days have 24 hours, just like yours. And since it is one Red Pimpernel (me) against hordes of Neo-Jacobins (you) it can sometimes happen that one of you does not get a Behandlung.

Yet you have time to post more questions to me in response to my question to you. Which, unsurprisingly, leaves me with the impression you don't want to answer the question. I mean, I answered yours...

 

[uke2se]

I like you twinstead. Your 'insults' have this velvet quality about them. So you are saying that I am putting the vast majority not on ignore because I am graciously able to handle all their points?

A big thank you!!

Are you a woman as your avatar suggests?

Is your dismal reading comprehension

A. stemming from your poor grasp of the English language

B. a willfully implemented trick to fool your mind that you're winning a debate

or

C. trolling?

 

[9/11-investigator]

Is 9/11's suggestion that the Germans were the unwitting victims of a Judeo-Bolshevik plot to start a war to extinguish the Aryan race.

Well, the Aryan race is not limited to the Germans, so your sentence is a little incoherent. But the Germans were indeed the (initial accidental) victims of the Jews for the simple reason that Britain had Palestine in it's colonial entourage. The Zionists wanted Palestine and hence they struck a deal with the British who happened to be in a hopeless fight with the Germans. The essence of the Balfour declaration was Palestine in exchange for the Jews pushing their American serfs into war on the side of the alllies.

As was predicted by Lloyd-George Versailles was an accident waiting to happen and that accident was called Hitler. Hitler was a (very intelligent) 'commoner' with no career prospects worth mentioning other than reading a lot of books. He correctly identified the Jews behind communism and in the thirties the German political landscape was dominated by the fight against the communists and the nationalists. And since the Germans are a tad smarter than Russians, they refused to undergo the same fate as Russia where the entire aristocratic class was murdered by the Judeo-Bolsheviks (and if we are to believe your Archibald Maule Ramsay (iPod version) something similar happened in 1789 in France). In general, Jews love populations with modest intelligence, because they are the easiest to control. I am not given examples here not to insult anyone.

About the 'plot concerning the Final Solution of the White race'... yes it exists:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=scRwcY0i_fA

The Germans on the other hand were not rapaciously grabbing land but merely coming to the aid of their fellows (Sudetenland) or attempting to re-establish their pre-Versailles treaty borders (another Jewish plot which involved making it look like Germany was the aggressor in the First World War).

I am not aware of Versailles as a Jewish plot but if you have information about this, please share it with us.

Of course once other countries declared war on Germany (who, as we recall were only minding their own business - see above) then the gloves were off but at no point in time did Germany do anything unjustified and all military expeditions were undertaken with a heavy heart and under extreme provocation.

Basically correct.

 

[SanityGap]

Well, the Aryan race is not limited to the Germans, so your sentence is a little incoherent. But the Germans were indeed the (initial accidental) victims of the Jews for the simple reason that Britain had Palestine in it's colonial entourage. The Zionists wanted Palestine and hence they struck a deal with the British who happened to be in a hopeless fight with the Germans. The essence of the Balfour declaration was Palestine in exchange for the Jews pushing their American serfs into war on the side of the alllies.

As was predicted by Lloyd-George Versailles was an accident waiting to happen and that accident was called Hitler. Hitler was a (very intelligent) 'commoner' with no career prospects worth mentioning other than reading a lot of books. He correctly identified the Jews behind communism and in the thirties the German political landscape was dominated by the fight against the communists and the nationalists. And since the Germans are a tad smarter than Russians, they refused to undergo the same fate as Russia where the entire aristocratic class was murdered by the Judeo-Bolsheviks (and if we are to believe your Ramsay something similar happened in 1789 in France). In general, Jews love populations with modest intelligence, because they are the easiest to control. I am not given examples here not to insult anyone.

About the 'plot concerning the Final Solution of the White race'... yes it exists:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=scRwcY0i_fA




I am not aware of Versailles as a Jewish plot but if you have information about this, please share it with us.



Basically correct.

Good grief

 

[uke2se]

Well, the Aryan race is not limited to the Germans, so your sentence is a little incoherent. But the Germans were indeed the (initial accidental) victims of the Jews for the simple reason that Britain had Palestine in it's colonial entourage. The Zionists wanted Palestine and hence they struck a deal with the British who happened to be in a hopeless fight with the Germans. The essence of the Balfour declaration was Palestine in exchange for the Jews pushing their American serfs into war on the side of the alllies.

As was predicted by Lloyd-George Versailles was an accident waiting to happen and that accident was called Hitler. Hitler was a (very intelligent) 'commoner' with no career prospects worth mentioning other than reading a lot of books. He correctly identified the Jews behind communism and in the thirties the German political landscape was dominated by the fight against the communists and the nationalists. And since the Germans are a tad smarter than Russians, they refused to undergo the same fate as Russia where the entire aristocratic class was murdered by the Judeo-Bolsheviks (and if we are to believe your Ramsay something similar happened in 1789 in France). In general, Jews love populations with modest intelligence, because they are the easiest to control. I am not given examples here not to insult anyone.

About the 'plot concerning the Final Solution of the White race'... yes it exists:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=scRwcY0i_fA




I am not aware of Versailles as a Jewish plot but if you have information about this, please share it with us.



Basically correct.

And all this has, of course, been shown to be crap in this thread. Nein11's closed mind prohibits him from acknowledging that his grasp of history is sub par - even when compared to a normal high school student. Thankfully, most of the rest of us are able to point out the many mistakes and lies in Nein11's narrative.

 

[9/11-investigator]

Today a warning on libertarian central:

http://www.lewrockwell.com/higgs/higgs172.html

Do not ignore that Pearl Harbor was a myth:

Along with the myth of Munich, the myth of the Pearl Harbor attack has performed magnificently in keeping Americans dumb and belligerent and in preparing them to sacrifice their children’s lives in the service of the ruling oligarchy. Unless the American people can rise above these historical myths, they stand little chance of freeing themselves from those who would make them the living, breathing but unthinking means for the attainment of their masters’ ends.

And with the New Pearl Harbor (9/11) same story, I would add.