Who started both World Wars?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Oh look.
He's back...presumably planning on ignoring everything that was put to him last time round.

I'll do Hiroshima...they consistently refused to acknowledge unconditional surrender. It's not as if the Potsdam declaration was exactly onerous.

There you go. That was easy.
 
You want to bet we will get your sorry little empire sunk into the ground as a revenge?

But before you will vanish from the page of time, we have to admit that we loved the Osmond Brothers! :D

Have fun with that. And remember, the nukes were for Berlin, but the Third Reich crumbled so fast it was inconvenient to drop them there.
 
Hi nein-11. How was Poland? See any mass graves?

4000 km drive in 1 week. Thank God returned before the onset of winter.
Roads in Poland splendid, Poland overall looks very good, now that they are in European sphere of influence, after they managed to escape the Anglo/Soviet prison.
Visited Birkenau, Treblinka and Sobibor.
Decided to drive to Kiev, capital of the Ukraine as well as no visum is required anymore. Roads are terrible, just like in the US. Will require European influx to mend that as well, as it will. When Russia is ready for Europe (and it is), the Ukraine certainly is.

Visited Babi Yar.

No mass graves.
 
Last edited:
Have fun with that. And remember, the nukes were for Berlin, but the Third Reich crumbled so fast it was inconvenient to drop them there.

Nowdays the Russians and French have them too, remember. And the means to deliver them accurately on places at little convenience to you.
 
Last edited:
And, no mass graves.

Then you didn't look very hard, especially considering the fact that they have been pointed out in many threads.

Perhaps you just didn't know what they were when you saw them.

ETA: Or perhaps you covered your eyes to safeguard your precious delusion.
 
Last edited:
Who's "we"? You and your pocket lint? You and your fellow Nazis? Neither is much of a threat.

Europeans, both in Europe and America, as they slowly learn what really happened during WW2.

And the internet will be instrumental in leaking the truth out. Nothing will be more fun that to see the ever growing divide what gov + media will tell us and what people read on the internet. And the most fervent defenders of the official story will be the 1991-STASI-look-alikes of the coming years. Good riddance to you.

Anglos and Jews are going to be the losers big-time.

What are you going to do about it?
Wait, you can ban me! :D
 
Last edited:
Fortunately, all it will take is time to show you how wrong you really are, 9/11-investigator. Let's just wait and see. I'm especially looking forward to see if in the future, you actually CAN believe everything you read on the internet instead of people like you just thinking so.
 
New from the IHR:



Here is the next Suvorow, Igor Bunich, presenting documentary evidence that Hitler pre-empted by a matter of weeks a planned Soviet attack on Europe. Thanks to Hitler and despite American (read: Jewish) attempts to aid the USSR in this endeavour, Holland and France and Spain were not overrun by the Soviets. We should be grateful for him.

Hitler statue, anyone?

Did you actually read that wiki article?
You know, the one that has all the red flags at the top about lack of biography, lack of expert input, lack of citations?
 
Europeans, both in Europe and America, as they slowly learn what really happened during WW2.

I, like most other Europeans, know perfectly well what happened during WWII. We all know that your kind was beaten to a pulp after murdering millions of people. We know that we don't want you back, and we know that right now there's not much chance of that happening, mainly because neo Nazis are so damned stupid.

And the internet will be instrumental in leaking the truth out.

The truth is out. You're using it to peddle lies.

Nothing will be more fun that to see the ever growing divide what gov + media will tell us and what people read on the internet.

Preach it, brother! I'm sure the loony at the street corner yelling about aliens thinks the same about his chances of getting the "truth" out.

And the most fervent defenders of the official story will be the 1991-STASI-look-alikes of the coming years. Good riddance to you.

I'm sorry, but your masturbatory fantasies are not only weird, but completely unrealistic.

Anglos and Jews are going to be the losers big-time.

What are you going to do about it?
Wait, you can ban me! :D

We can laugh at you. It must hurt knowing how much of a failure you Nazis are. You lost hideously 65 years ago, and you haven't made any headway since.

What are you going to do about it? Oh wait, you're going to whine about it on the internet. Meanwhile, Jews have nukes. Not as easy to drag them off to gas chambers now.
 
Last edited:
Here is another revisionist book:

"Überfall auf Europa", edited by Dmitrij Chmelnizki.

It is a collection of articles by mainstream Russian revisionists.

Before people start the usual Anglo smear: 'Neo-Nazi's!!!'... it is reminded here that Chmelnizki is a left-leaning Jewish liberal and a holo-believer.

But he supports Suvurow. And one of the articles in that book is written by himself: Panzer für Getreide: US-Unterstützung für die Rote Armee. That's German for: Tanks for grain: U.S. support for the Red Army.

First of all Chmelnizki confirms that Hitler always had stated that a 2-front war was madness (as history indeed in the end has proven twice). The reason why Hitler nevertheless attacked the USSR was purely out of desperation. He had no choice. Even the Alllies admitted this behind closed doors in Nuremberg. This is what Jackson said:

"To this Jackson retorted: 'Who’s talking about a fair trial? Of course the Germans will try to accuse the Allies of pursuing a policy that forced them into war. I expect that, since I know about the documents seized from the German Foreign Office. They all come to the same conclusion: "We have no way out. We must fight; we are encircled; we are being strangled:" Well, it would be a catastrophe if this trial got into a discussion about the political and economic causes of the war. That could cause an unending disaster in both America and Europe . . . .

The Anglos admit it themselves!!!

But this is just an excursion. The real message of this article is this...

Where the hell did the USSR get all their weapons from?
The Germans destroyed 18,000 tanks, 22,000 canons, 14,500 planes. It was only thanks to the enemy of Europe, I mean the USA, that the USSR in the end did not lose, so they could sit together in Nuremberg with these Americans and British to invent the holo-tale and finish Europe off for 6-7 decades.

Here is the secret, Albert Kahn, an American Jew. Again, this article is written by a Jew, remember, not a 'neo-Nazi', whatever that me be in 2010.

What does wikipedia have to say about Albert Kahn?

"Kahn's firm's Moscow office built 521 factories between 1930 and 1932."

Right.

Wikipedia mentions in passing the work of Kahn in Russia as an architect. Not sure if this applies globally, but if I open any wikipedia page here in Holland we see the face of Jimmy Wales, the Jew who runs Wikipedia today. He wants money, no surprises here. Wikipedia is run by a Jew.

Now back to what Chmelnizki has to say. In February 1930 Kahn signed a contract with a representative of the Soviet government, a Saul Bron, from an organization called Amtorg. We don't have to delve deep to find out the ethnic background of this guy.

In 1930 the USSR was not even able to produce tractors, let alone tanks. 12 years later they had 24,000 tanks, all produced in the USSR.

Reason: Albert Kahn.

In 1929 Kahn's firm located in Detroit got the assignment to build a tractor factory in Stalingrad. This meant in practice a tank factory as well. In 1929 the USSR and the USA had no diplomatic relations. After all the Dutch Jew Roosevelt was not yet in power and, as a Jew, he loved the USSR. Kahn was very discrete about this contract. As wikipedia says Kahn built 521 factories for tractors (and tanks), between 1929 1932, in Stalingrad, Kharkow, Tomsk and Tscheljabinsk. From this list it becomes clear that Kahn built the entire Soviet armaments industry. This was done under the hardest possible conditions for the Soviet population, under the usage of slave labor, something that Kahn must have known.

Oh, and there was a little clause in the contract, Kahn was obliged to help propagate communism in the USA.

Jewish communism, anyone?

All the parts necessary for the build-up of these arms factories were produced in the US of A. Where else. It was a gigantic contract, 2 billion (worth 200 billion in present day worth). Not just these factories but also the complete infrastructure like houses for workers, were produced by Kahn. The money to pay Kahn was raised by selling the last corn of grain the commissars could find. Chmelnizki states that the famine was mainly caused by this enterprise of arming the 'peace loving' USSR. In 1932 the contract was extended.

so what intention could the USSR have had with this build-up against enormous costs?
 
Last edited:
Blah blah blah.

Any reply to the many points where you have been shown to be wrong?

ETA: The only source I can find for that alleged Jackson quote is Horst Mahler, former communist terrorist co-founder of the Red Army Faction with Ulrike Meinhof and Andreas Baader, currently incarcerated for Holocaust denial. Not the most reliable source, but about on par for nein-11.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom