Who started both World Wars?

Status
Not open for further replies.
This is a perfect illustration of present day America; here is an Irish American writing a hit piece on the Kennedy's, also of Irish descent but far more glamorous:

http://hnn.us/articles/697.html

This is what you must think to be polite company in America.

The Kennedy clan was the last serious resistance against America being taken over by the Jews (Nixon was merely a death rattle). Kennedy sr. perfectly understood by what influences Roosevelt was controlled (not that R. resented this control). Kennedy sr. passed this attitude over on JFK, the Hitler admirer. He wanted to prevent Israel from acquiring nukes, he wanted to abolish the largely Jewish owned FED, JFK warned America against these infiltrations (read Jews) This speech and his actions got JFK killed by the Jewish mob around Meyer Lanski and launched the Jew Johnson into presidential power without elections necessary. The first thing he did was opening up America for unrestricted immigration from the third world.
 
Nobody denies that Germany lost. But they lost honourably against an overwhelmingly outnumbering force.

Sounds like Germany should have stayed the hell out of Poland. And Russia.

Also, "honourably"? What's so honorable about destroying your enemy's cultural treasures as you retreat? What's so honorable about continuing to fight long after the struggle is clearly lost, ensuring years of hardship for your own civilians?

Hitler himself said that he wanted a "scorched earth" policy as the Allies and Russians advanced, specifically stating that he didn't care if the German people suffered as a result; it was their fault for losing the war.

This is "honorable"?
 
This is a perfect illustration of present day America; here is an Irish American writing a hit piece on the Kennedy's, also of Irish descent but far more glamorous:

http://hnn.us/articles/697.html

This is what you must think to be polite company in America.

The Kennedy clan was the last serious resistance against America being taken over by the Jews (Nixon was merely a death rattle). Kennedy sr. perfectly understood by what influences Roosevelt was controlled (not that R. resented this control). Kennedy sr. passed this attitude over on JFK, the Hitler admirer. He wanted to prevent Israel from acquiring nukes, he wanted to abolish the largely Jewish owned FED, JFK warned America against these infiltrations (read Jews) This speech and his actions got JFK killed by the Jewish mob around Meyer Lanski and launched the Jew Johnson into presidential power without elections necessary. The first thing he did was opening up America for unrestricted immigration from the third world.

I'm stunned.

All I can say is...this is a reminder of how important it is to remember to take your medication.
 
Set your own house in order, then you can complain about others. Until then you are doing nothing but being a poster-child for hypocrisy.

Rewriting history is one of the most potent actions one can undertake to change the course of the future.

Setting our house in order first implies going after traitors like ddt. Holland is wel under way in setting up a real defense against these people and ddt knows it. The anti-1968 revolution that is now underway needs a few scape goats for the pek-en-veren session. Neo-NSB-ers like ddt are volunteering. Keep up the fight, ddt. We need you! :D
 
*cough* Native Americans *cough*

Funny you should mention that...the Native Americans aren't finished yet. They have accumulated such a huge war chest from their casinos that they are becoming an increasingly powerful political force in some parts of the country.

But, yeah, the theory doesn't always hold true.
 
This is a perfect illustration of present day America; here is an Irish American writing a hit piece on the Kennedy's, also of Irish descent but far more glamorous:

http://hnn.us/articles/697.html

This is what you must think to be polite company in America.

The Kennedy clan was the last serious resistance against America being taken over by the Jews (Nixon was merely a death rattle). Kennedy sr. perfectly understood by what influences Roosevelt was controlled (not that R. resented this control). Kennedy sr. passed this attitude over on JFK, the Hitler admirer. He wanted to prevent Israel from acquiring nukes, he wanted to abolish the largely Jewish owned FED, JFK warned America against these infiltrations (read Jews) This speech and his actions got JFK killed by the Jewish mob around Meyer Lanski and launched the Jew Johnson into presidential power without elections necessary. The first thing he did was opening up America for unrestricted immigration from the third world.
You make sweeping generalizations based on one article? You impress less and less every post.
 
Funny you should mention that...the Native Americans aren't finished yet. They have accumulated such a huge war chest from their casinos that they are becoming an increasingly powerful political force in some parts of the country.
I WISH they kept all the money that comes in, but there is considerable skimming going on. The raw numbers bear little relation to the bottom line for the Nations.
But, yeah, the theory doesn't always hold true.
None do, certainly. At best theories are starting points for closer examination.
 
Rewriting history is one of the most potent actions one can undertake to change the course of the future.

I wish you would stop making this claim that there is a single, government-authorized or Jew-authorized version of history.

The history of WWII has been recorded in great detail from many different perspectives. The facts are out there, and have been interpreted many different ways. Most of these interpretations are subject to debate but are more or less consistent with the facts.

The problem with YOUR interpretation is that it is not parsimonious. It makes too many assumptions, such as shadowy cabals of nameless Jews working the puppet-strings from behind the scenes. It assumes that the recorded facts that contradict your interpretation are lies, based on no more evidence than that you wish it to be.

Throw out what you THINK you know, and look at the historical record from a completely disinterested viewpoint. This will require you to actually look at source material that hasn't already been filtered and distorted by neo-fascists and white supremecists.

You aren't fooling anyone here. All you are doing is convincing yourself, so you can spread the lies to like-minded but uneducated and sheep-like nazi-sympathizers, many of whom are no doubt the product of generations of incest.

(Cheap shot, I know. But something's got to explain the in-your-face willful ignorance of this bunch.)
 
I wish you would stop making this claim that there is a single, government-authorized or Jew-authorized version of history.

The history of WWII has been recorded in great detail from many different perspectives. The facts are out there, and have been interpreted many different ways. Most of these interpretations are subject to debate but are more or less consistent with the facts.

The problem with YOUR interpretation is that it is not parsimonious. It makes too many assumptions, such as shadowy cabals of nameless Jews working the puppet-strings from behind the scenes. It assumes that the recorded facts that contradict your interpretation are lies, based on no more evidence than that you wish it to be.

Throw out what you THINK you know, and look at the historical record from a completely disinterested viewpoint. This will require you to actually look at source material that hasn't already been filtered and distorted by neo-fascists and white supremecists.

You aren't fooling anyone here. All you are doing is convincing yourself, so you can spread the lies to like-minded but uneducated and sheep-like nazi-sympathizers, many of whom are no doubt the product of generations of incest.

(Cheap shot, I know. But something's got to explain the in-your-face willful ignorance of this bunch.)

Any lurkers are being educated about the real facts and that is all to the good.
 
You have no millenia old history to fall back upon, unlike the Dutch, Germans and Russians. You are a sort of white mulatto's. Maybe that is what Dolfie meant.
Oh, ancient history! We all know how good you are at that. :rolleyes:

Quizz time.

Dutch history:
1) Name the most notable event in "Dutch" history ca. 2,000 years ago.
2) Name the tribe associated with that event.
3) How do we know about that event?
4) What was the profession of the main person in that event?
5) Why did he start that event?
6) Until when is the tribe from (2) attested in history?
7) What is the relevance of that event to modern Dutch history?
Hint.

German history:
8-13) Repeat questions 1-4 & 6-7 for "German" history.
Hint.

I'm not as versed in Russian history, so those questions are easier:
14) Name the first Russian royal house, ca. 1,200 years ago.
15) Where did those kings come from?
 
You are special, and you have had a Special Education (which apparently didn't help.)

Your conclusion that nein11 had special education is consistent with dafydd's conclusion that he works at a sheltered workplace. I say we have some convergence of evidence here. ;)
 
But I have to admit, the Americans have a low racial consciousness, not because of some imagined moral superiority but because:
1) of their typical '1/4 Ukrainian, 1/4 German, 1/4 Spanish, 1/4 Irish' 'racial/genetic make-up' and
2) being descendants of lower European classes where 'blood' obviously is less of an important matter.

Or simply because they finally realised, unlike you, that race is unimportant and irrelevant.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom