Who started both World Wars?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Mirrorglass said:
So.. in perfect world, the US conquered all of Eurasia after the fall of Germany, and now rules the Earth with an iron grip?
Click to expand...

That is what America's ruling Jewish class is pursuing now. They will fail, as they failed to use the USSR for the same world revolutionary goals, and lose their current host #1, America. The question is with what amount of damage their removal from power will happen. I am afraid the mess will be far greater than with the dismantling of the USSR in 1991.

Keyword: Iran.

In the 'perfect world' America had never entered WW1 and had left Europe alone, forcing Britain to accept one of Germany's many peace offers. But Britain declined since she had never accepted the existence of a dominant '1871-Germany' in the first place, the real reason for the outbreak of WW1.

But the Jews wanted Palestine at all cost, so the ruin of Europe could begin.
 
Last edited:
9/11-investigator said:
That is what America's ruling Jewish class is pursuing now. They will fail and lose their host #1, America. The question is with what amount of dammage their removal from power will happen.
Click to expand...

So why didn't the US wage war against Russia in 1945? They were controlled by evil Jews bent on world domination, right?

In the 'perfect world' America had never entered WW1 and had left Europe alone, forcing Britain to accept one of Germany's many peace offers. But Britain declined since she had never accepted the existence of 1871-Germany in the first place, the real reason for the outbreak of WW1.
Click to expand...

So it wasn't because of the Jews manipulating Britain, after all?
 
Mirrorglass said:
So why didn't the US wage war against Russia in 1945? They were controlled by evil Jews bent on world domination, right?
Click to expand...


And the U.S. was the only nation with the atomic bomb at the time (indeed, it would remain so until August of 1949). So it had the ultimate weapon by which it could have won any war with the Soviets.
 
Mirrorglass said:
So why didn't the US wage war against Russia in 1945? They were controlled by evil Jews bent on world domination, right?
Click to expand...

They had no story to tell the American public why they would attack a former ally.

It goes too far to say that during WW2 America was controlled by the Jews (it is now, the entire 20th century was the century of the rise of the Jews, both in the SU and in the US). It was the American government that was controlled by the Jews, certainly under Roosevelt. But that does not mean that the US government could do what it wanted. There was a strong isolationist tendency in America limiting the Spielraum of the government. After all entry in WW2 had to be engineered by the US government under a pretext. Roosevelt had promised during the election that he would not to go to war. Moreover before the end of the war Roosevelt was succeeded by Truman, without Jewish affiliations that Roosevelt had.


So it wasn't because of the Jews manipulating Britain, after all?
Click to expand...

Not sure what you mean with 'it'? The outbreak of WW1 had nothing to do with Jews. The role of the Jews on the international stage began when they offered Britain to bring in the US in exchange for Palestine to break the stalemate on the battle field.
 
Last edited:
In the crazy 9/11 world if the Jews were so powerful why didn't they just have Britain give them Palestine? Which they had conquered from the Ottomans. Instead of the instead of the incredibly complex dance he thinks the Jews did to get the world at war a second time.....think of all the things that could have gone wrong....
 
Mirrorglass said:
As a slight derail, is Obama of Jewish heritage, as well?
Click to expand...

Maybe.

Nobody knows who Barack Obama (Barry Soetoro?) really is. The Jews know it and have has birth certificate ready in case he makes trouble. They just need to leak it and Barry is history and can go back to the slums. Barry will therefore obey.

Obama is for 100% the product of 'Chicago businessmen' (read Jews). The Jews always have a set of candidates in store for the next election.

http://www.rense.com/general76/cur.htm
What this means is that 100% of the viable Democratic candidates in the 2004 primary were either Jewish or in the case of Dean, married to a Jew. Now wait, it gets worse.
Click to expand...


I do not know if Barry is Jewish, but it is not necessary that he is Jewish. He is just the boy that gets a piece of paper handed over and he gets a push in the back towards the microphone and next he is expected to read aloud what is written on the paper. That is the only role for our former 'community worker'. The paper is handed over to Barry by his Jewish handlers Rahm Emanuel or David Axelrod and were produced in a Jewish think tank. That's how politics in Anglosphere works.

Britain same story. Here is a really devastating account of Jewish rule in Britain:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-444345/Lord-Cashpoint--bogus-count-porn-star-wife.html

Then they witnessed an extraordinary exchange. Lord Levy was taking a call when the Prime Minister walked over to him and started to speak.

Courtney said: "Lord Levy held up his hand and said, "Not now, Tony," and went back to his phone call.

The Prime Minister turned to walk away and Lord Levy said, "Tony, wait, I need to speak to you."

"I thought, "My God, what a way to talk to a Prime Minister." But Mr Blair stood there like a puppet on a string while Levy continued his phone call for at least a couple of minutes.

Then he turned to the Prime Minister without apology for keeping him waiting and launched into a conversation about the importance of the evening.

"Here was the leader of your Government being treated like a child. Jane Hogarth, Lord Levy and Tony Blair all acted like this was normal.
Click to expand...

You cannot get it clearer than this: Levi says 'jump' and Blair, the elected PM of the Not-So-Great-Britain, asks 'how high'.

Brand new article by Paul Craig Roberts:
How did Tony Blair and his wife, Cherie, end up with an annual income of ten million pounds (approximately $15 million dollars) as soon as he left office? Who was Blair really serving?

These are not polite questions, and they are infrequently asked.
Click to expand...

Answer: Jews.

This is how it works: some shabbos goy like Blair or Clinton serves the Jews and if he does it well, like surpressing Serb nationalism in Europe or starting the war against Iraq on 'sexed up reports' (1 million killed as a result or 10 Hiroshima's) he is rewarded afterwards in the lecture circuit, resulting in a nice mansion in Kensington or some other posh place.

Churchill lived in Chartwell and lived far beyond his means in the thirties. Fortunately for him there were some Jews around in London at the time willing to lend a helping hand in exchange for some favours... Millions died as a result. Anglo corruption in action.
 
Last edited:
Oh crikey. So you're a birther as well? And the slums? So you honestly have no idea about Obama's roots?
 
That is the whole point of Buchanan's book: why for heaven's sake ally yourself with the worst criminals of all, the Soviets???
Click to expand...
My enemies enemy is my friend.

As for being in Moscow in Months.

How did that work out for the Germans before Russia was fully mobilised?
 
9/11-investigator said:
For future reference, long article that says that Roosevelt already manipulated the war as early as 1939, not just via the Japanese.

http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v04/v04p135_Weber.html
Click to expand...

You should read material before commenting on it. The Polish papers clearly show the US were prediciting a war in Europe, not creating one. The entry for Nov 38' even shows how wrong the US predicition of how the war would be fought was wrong

But why did the Americans feel so unsettled. Well that a good question

Perhaps the violations of the treaty of Versailles in 35 36 38, including the reoccupation of the Rhine

Perhaps the annex of Austria in March 38

Or the Munich agreement of Sept 38
 
I don't know if you've heard of this, but Germany invaded Poland. They also killed several million people in concentration camps (even if you don't count the Jews).
 
Mirrorglass said:
I don't know if you've heard of this, but Germany invaded Poland.
Click to expand...

They invaded that piece of Poland that was theirs before 1917 but had lost it due to WW1. Nobody had a problem with the non-existence of Poland before Versailles.

Oh, and the later allie of the British, the USSR, invaded the other half of Poland at the same time in coordination with Germany (it was their's also before 1917). Yet for some mysterious reason that was no problem at all for the British to become buddy-buddy with the Soviets.

Oh, and btw, before 1939 Britain had invaded 25% of the planet's surface and colonized it. What's the difference? I would say the British were the better 'Nazis' according to you own logic.

They also killed several million people in concentration camps (even if you don't count the Jews).
Click to expand...

I would like to see some proof of that. My suspicion is that the British kicked Hoess long enough in the testicles to produce the desired result.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom