I note that you are quoting from "The Nameless war". Good reliable source that. Here's what Wikipedia has to say about it.
"In 1952 Ramsay wrote The Nameless War as an autobiography and a plea to justify his actions. Much of the book consisted of an antisemitic conspiracy theory re-interpreting the whole of modern history as an ongoing Jewish campaign for world domination, quoting extensively from the The Protocols of the Elders of Zion whose authenticity he took for granted, and adding such assertions as that Calvin had been a Jew whose real name was "Cohen", that Cromwell had been "a paid agent of the Jews" and that the entire English Civil War and the execution of Charles I were staged for the sole purpose of allowing Jews to return to England."
Makes Buchanan look accurate.
Any idea why MP Ramsay was locked up during the war without charges and conviction? He represented a danger maybe for those who shaped policy?
Leaving Calvin=Cohen aside for a moment, Ramsay's observations about the role of the Jews in Britain during WW2 are not so farfetched. He was an MP, he was operating in the heart of British politics, for christ sake!
P.S. I am not taking sides in the Calvin=Cohen issue here, but Catholicism was an effective means in keeping the Jews in check for centuries. The idea that the People of the Book came up with a Calvinist ideology to give a philo-semitic twist to the rise of Protestantism (Martin Luther himself was as antisemitic as you can get, antisemitic as in 'seeing through the Jews') is not as far-fetched as it seems. Holland of the 17th century was the first explicit calvinist-protestant nation and was very Jew-friendly because of it's calvinist ideology. Amsterdam became the center of 'international Jewry' after they were kicked out of Spain (from what country were they not kicked out at some point?). From Amsterdam the global rise of the Jews was prepared by the Jewish financed Dutch invasion of Britain ('Glorious Revolution' under King Billy). The Dutch interest was to subjugate Britain and rob it's treasury to fight the other catholic bully France (Britain and France had raped Holland in 1972). A marvellous move by the Dutch, the most daring one in their history, blocking 2 entities with 10 times their population base. But hey,
does not Holland always send big bullies home early on?
Just kidding **. But the Jewish interest was to gain a foothold in Britain and later to America. The great Dutch/American anti-semite Peter Stuyvesant (my avatar) warned against the Jews ('a treacherous people'), to no avail. Dutch founded and owned New Amsterdam now turned into the 'Jewish owned' New York (thanks to the British, who else?) and in parallel the American Republic modelled after the Dutch Republic (
the Declaration of Independence is basically a literally copy of our 'Acte van Verlatinge') slowly morphed into the ZOG-joint that it is today. The rise of the
Henry Ford-ian 'International Jew' is unthinkable without the Dutch catalyst. Unfortunately.
**
what happened yesterday here in Amsterdam was a massive thinly veiled display of nationalism. 700,000+ people, invariable dressed in Orange celebrating the 2nd position in the biggest world sports tournament, in a sport that comes closest in modelling a war (
voetbal is oorlog). The anti-immigrant party PVV is now by far the largest in the polls. Holland is one of the most likely candidates of becoming once again the spearhead of yet another global identitarian movement. Holland was the first fully fledged modern nation in world history. It could be the first to radically say no against the massive invasion from the south.
Apartheid is a Dutch word. The Dutch have the name of being tolerant, a left-over of the historic compromise in the Catholic-Protestant conflict of centuries ago, now wrongly interpreted as an invation to the rest of the world to take our country over. Don't underestimate the Dutch pride. We are not dead by a long shot.
What did Jews win, exactly ?