What will Iran bomb first?

What place will Iran bomb first as retaliation?

  • Haifa

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Beer Sheva

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Eilat

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • America

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    41
Well , your ranting about "The Jew Controlled Press" would strike most people as Anti Semitic.


The majority of Jews in Israel and America have a liberal stance favoring
a peaceful solution. And I'm in complete harmony with those lovely people.
Hardly Antisemitic, is it? - And now try to answer the OP's Question:

What would Iranians retaliation look like?
 
No, the international Media reports that the Reactor is a highly probable
target as well. While centrifuges enriching uranium-235to a level of 3.7
percent while 90% is needed to build a nuke.

Are you out to set a new record for consecutive errors? Those same centrifuges which can enrich uranium from natural levels to 3.7% can further enrich it from 3.7% to 90%. All it takes is time. That they haven't done so yet says nothing about their capacity to do so in the future.
 
I think Oliver is trying to set the record for stupid posts.
What amazes me is that Oliver seem totally obliviously to the comtempt that he is held in by almost everybody who is a regular at JREF.Even people who might agree with his general political views think he is an idiot.

Please keep in mind the Membership Agreement and do not use personal attacks to argue your point.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Lisa Simpson
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Are you out to set a new record for consecutive errors? Those same centrifuges which can enrich uranium from natural levels to 3.7% can further enrich it from 3.7% to 90%. All it takes is time. That they haven't done so yet says nothing about their capacity to do so in the future.


So? Did they [Iranians] enrich the Uranium to a higher level yet? :confused:

You acknowledge that a sentence like "The
Edited by Darat: 
Breach of Rule 10 removed.
could rob a bank
because he now owns a gun now" is no valid argument to put him into
jail. So why does your imagination diffuse rationality and justice in case
of Iran?

And you still didn't think about the OP: What kind of retaliation do
you expect? - You certainly should think about that question if you're
in favor of destroying anything on Iran's soil.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Oliver, your comments are vile and bigoted. I hope that you never are allowed to post again.
 
So? Did they [Iranians] enrich the Uranium to a higher level yet? :confused:

Maybe. They've hidden their progress on nuclear program before.

You acknowledge that a sentence like "The ******* could rob a bank
because he now owns a gun now" is no valid argument to put him into
jail. So why does your imagination diffuse rationality and justice in case
of Iran?

Thanks for that insight into your true nature. You're not only antisemitic, you're racist as well.

International relations are not the equivalent of domestic law, but even if you want to play that game, your scenario isn't the appropriate equivalent. The police most certainly will act if someone talks about how they want to rob a bank and then goes and buys a gun.

And you still didn't think about the OP: What kind of retaliation do
you expect? - You certainly should think about that question if you're
in favor of destroying anything on Iran's soil.

I have indeed thought of it. Iran would most likely use their Hezbollah proxies to attack. Furthermore, I have not taken a position on whether or not Israel should attack Iran's nuclear program. The answer to that depends heavily on details concerning risks of such a mission and probability of success which I am not privy to.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Maybe. They've hidden their progress on nuclear program before.


Thankfully, the US-NIE has a clear summing regarding the question.

Thanks for that insight into your true nature. You're not only antisemitic, you're racist as well.


Nope - I'm just pointing out the kind of racism we're talking about
in here. You can replace
Edited by Darat: 
Breach of Rule 10 removed.
with Iran. The same kind of
racist thinking is at work here. You just may not have understood
your personal relation to the indeed racial example I made.

International relations are not the equivalent of domestic law, but even if you want to play that game, your scenario isn't the appropriate equivalent. The police most certainly will act if someone talks about how they want to rob a bank and then goes and buys a gun.


So? How does Iran want to get "Teh Nuke". Still no evidence. That's
my point.

I have indeed thought of it. Iran would most likely use their Hezbollah proxies to attack. Furthermore, I have not taken a position on whether or not Israel should attack Iran's nuclear program. The answer to that depends heavily on details concerning risks of such a mission and probability of success which I am not privy to.


Not really. The Israeli point is that Israel doesn't have any dominance
left over the region once anyone else does have Nukes. They're clearly
playing the bully here. But they don't see how protecting Israel with
most hawkish measurements does indeed undermine Israel's reputation,
national security and future. There is no solution to this unless they
start to make friends rather than enemies.

And I'm not an enemy of Israel. I'm just against digging themselves
even deeper into the mud of self-destruction and opposition.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
They should bomb North Korea but I forget that Mahmoud Ahmadinejad loves people like Kim Jong-il and Robert Mugabe.
 
They should bomb North Korea but I forget that Mahmoud Ahmadinejad loves people like Kim Jong-il and Robert Mugabe.


Your arguments are childish. So what about the OP: What would
Iran's retaliation look like after an attack on their soil?
 
Oliver, your comments are vile and bigoted. I hope that you never are allowed to post again.


Huh? Skepticism sucks? At JREF? Seriously?

Let's try to make valid arguments - and we may see who is right about
a topic and who is just whining about himself being out of arguments,
shall we? :">
 
Oliver, do you claim that the Russians would give or sell nuclear weapons to Iran? That was the question. My answer is "not damned likely." I am well aware that they are supplying other nuclear technology.

So did Putin call you up (he speaks fluent German, I believe, since he was stationed there as a young man) and tell you otherwise? "Yes, Oliver Oliverovich, I have decided to supply Iran with actual nuclear weapons."

ETA: I do not really believe your patronymic is "Oliverovich." I just tossed that in for the heck of it.

ETA2: And what do you mean by "you guys"?


No, I'm not saying that Russia will send a postcard to Iran with
a Nuke attached on it. The facts, on the other Hand, say that
Russia provides missile technology, nuclear fuel and nuclear
knowhow to Iran. They don't have to send nukes to Iran if they
provide everything else for Iran to make Nukes for themselves.
But that's not the topic of this thread: There is no evidence
for Iran trying to get Nukes at the current time. The question
is: What will the retaliation looks like:

Your on-topic answer to this is....
 
Not really. The Israeli point is that Israel doesn't have any dominance
left over the region once anyone else does have Nukes. They're clearly
playing the bully here.

Iran has killed Israeli civilians via its terrorist proxies. Israel has never attacked Iran, directly OR by proxy. And you're claiming Israel is the bully?

And I'm not an enemy of Israel.

No, you're not. You just favor enemies of Israel at every opportunity. It takes a sophisticated mind like yours to appreciate the nuanced difference, I'm sure.
 
Iran has killed Israeli civilians via its terrorist proxies. Israel has never attacked Iran, directly OR by proxy.

Which reminds me something I have seen in the news today:
Argentine President Cristina Fernandez asked Iran on Tuesday to hand over several citizens suspected of planning the deadly 1994 bombing of an Argentine Jewish center, so they can face a local trial.

"I would ask the Islamic Republic of Iran in accordance with international law...accept that Argentine justice can put on trial...those citizens who have been accused," Fernandez told the U.N. General Assembly in New York.

Argentina has asked for the arrest of former Iranian President Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, seven other Iranians and a former Hezbollah guerrilla leader on charges they masterminded the blast, which killed 85 people.
 
Iran has killed Israeli civilians via its terrorist proxies. Israel has never attacked Iran, directly OR by proxy. And you're claiming Israel is the bully?

No, you're not. You just favor enemies of Israel at every opportunity. It takes a sophisticated mind like yours to appreciate the nuanced difference, I'm sure.


Nope - I don't favor Iran, I just think that if Israel attacks Iran, Iran
has every right to make an counterattack. Call me nonpartisan, that
would be the most truthful description of my POV.
 
you'r with them or against them....

Bush made it clear, nonpartisan, neutrality etc do not exist anymore.
You are one of the Good guys or one of the evil doers.

but Oliver, you are from a "Schurken Staat" anyway, isnt Germany still on the axis of evil?
 

Back
Top Bottom