Split Thread What happened to Flight 93?


Oh, well. Time for a comic strip.

514647bed7ea02d19.jpg
 
I just posted a link to video of the excavation of a Spitfire that buried itself completely in clay in France. No twoofer who has seen it seems to think it has anything to do with Flt 93.

My point would be that glacial till is no more resistant to penetration than the French clay. It is a matter of how deep it is, I think.

The point is always raised about Flt 585 near Denver. I shopuld think that the difference there is the depth of the bedrock in the two locations.

I doubt that the soil around Denver is all that deep, and that this accounts for the stuff that stayed above ground level.
 
Great challenge. Do I have to match the seat color as well?

I don't even know what point you're attempting to make with your sarcastic question. You have stated reasons why you don't think Flight 93 crashed in Shanksville. These reasons are the standards you use to judge a crash site.

All you are being asked to do is to apply those very same standards to other airline crashes in history, so as to make sure your judgment isn't blinded by a double-standard. It's not too much to ask.

And there's no shame in admitting you have a double-standard--almost everyone is biased to some degree, and it is only by recognizing and admitting our biases that we can compensate for them.
 
Last edited:
Al

So what? The fact that you are not satisfied with the pictures you happen to have does nothing to dismiss all the evidence and eyewitnesses do we have.

I

Here is some of the evidence we have for Flight 93.

Some Flight 93 Evidence Updated 5/27/09
http://911links.webs.com/Flight93.htm


[6] Lots of Flight 93 links

[6] --------------------------------------------------------------
Lots of Flight 93 links
http://wtc7lies.googlepages.com/flight93shanksvillesummaryofevidence,man


Item 6 is a broken link,
 
What happened to flight 93?

I don't know Red.

And apparently by the looks of this thread neither do the debunkers.

Who would have thunk it?
 
What happened to flight 93?

I don't know Red.

And apparently by the looks of this thread neither do the debunkers.

Who would have thunk it?

brokenrecord.jpg


1184366739062b.jpg


[What] at the crash scene the deciding factor between calling this identical crash scene real:

[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/thum_268324a2170eb0ae49.png[/qimg]

and the shankville one:
[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/thum_268324a21710f67ead.jpg[/qimg]

fake [to you people]?

How many teeth do people have to pull out to get trolls to answer simple questions?
 
Last edited:
What happened to flight 93?

I don't know Red.

And apparently by the looks of this thread neither do the debunkers.

Who would have thunk it?

What I've gotten so far is that it managed to simultaneously bury itself and break up into tiny pieces while leaving behind no soil contamination and not burning any of the grass around the rim.
 
What I've gotten so far is that it managed to simultaneously bury itself and break up into tiny pieces while leaving behind no soil contamination and not burning any of the grass around the rim.


Ah, maybe the sane people here have underestimated you frauds. You raise an intriguing point. Can we assume that you believe that the rescue crews and crash investigators were making a fundamental mistake by collecting the wreckage of the crashed aircraft and recovering body parts when they should have been testing the soil for, for, for something? A fascinating approach. Totally mad, but fascinating.
 
Can we assume that you believe that the rescue crews and crash investigators were making a fundamental mistake by collecting the wreckage of the crashed aircraft and recovering body parts when they should have been testing the soil for, for, for something? A fascinating approach. Totally mad, but fascinating.

Well, clearly Red believes the eyewitnesses, first responders, and crash scene investigators were part of the cover up to make the world believe an airplane crashed where in fact one did not.

But then again, he also thinks the FDNY are part the elaborate WTC7 conspiracy (that bunch of shills insist it was the fires that caused its collapse!). He also thinks Turner Construction was responsible for prepping the controlled demolition of WTC1 and WTC2. This, despite the fact that Turner Construction isn't even in the controlled demolition industry.

So the madness goes deeper than you might have first suspected.

ETA: RedIbis' caption for the above photo: "Three accomplices to mass murder stand over the faked crash site they will soon be lying to the world about."
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom