You think that a full fuel tank and an empty fuel tank have the same density? Really?
He also seems to think that the outer sheeting is what cut the columns.
Planes don't hold in the air with just outer sheeting.
You think that a full fuel tank and an empty fuel tank have the same density? Really?
Please explain how water jets can cut steel (you can find examples easily on YouTube).
Basically, you don't understand the concept of "impulse".
You think that a full fuel tank and an empty fuel tank have the same density? Really?
Are we going to hear how the wing shaped holes were created by a swarm of cruise missiles striking at various angels? I always liked that story.
![]()
The density of the tank itself, never changes. The fuel may add mass to the wing, but not density to the aluminum. As soon as that tank is punctured, the integrity of the mass of fuel is lost.
The density of the tank itself, never changes. The fuel may add mass to the wing, but not density to the aluminum. As soon as that tank is punctured, the integrity of the mass of fuel is lost.
The density of the tank itself, never changes. The fuel may add mass to the wing, but not density to the aluminum. As soon as that tank is punctured, the integrity of the mass of fuel is lost.
Please explain how an island in the Pacific, 6 miles across, is different from a 6-mile across island from the sky impacting at 10-20 miles/sec. Why does the Pacific island rock not produce a tsunami and the Chicxulub asteroid rock of the same size causes a world-wide environmental catastrophe and wipes out the dinosaurs?
Next question: Why does a plane sitting on the runway not cut through steel, but a plane at 400MPH does?
Answer to both: Speed. Speed multiplies force, and as the speed goes up, the force is increased exponentially.
Try this sometime. Throw a baseball against a brick wall. The best pitcher can do this at 100MPH. Then throw the same baseball at the wall at 15 miles per second. Think the results will be the same?
... The fuel may add mass to the wing, but not density to the aluminum.
How is a jet like an asteroid?
How is a baseball like a jet?
The density of the tank itself, never changes. The fuel may add mass to the wing, but not density to the aluminum. As soon as that tank is punctured, the integrity of the mass of fuel is lost.
... After all there are pictures that show the wing tips did not penitrate the steel,
Only fractured the Aluminum outer Cladding.
How is a jet like an asteroid?
How is a baseball like a jet?
Well that's no use to Yankee. His narrative requires the Official Story to claim the plane sliced a perfect cookie cutter plane-shape through the steel. Like a hot knife through butter. If people are going to suggest the hole was ragged and the steel wasn't neatly sliced and some steel didn't break then his whole line of argument is just going to look silly. And then where will we be?
Water requires specialized equipment to cut steel. Utilizing very high pressure, jeweled nozzles, and often added abrasives water jets can only cut steel as long as the integrity of the column of water is maintained (focusing its mass on a tiny point) which is accomplished by keeping the nozzle very close to the steel.
Please explain how a 767 which spreads its mass and velocity from wingtip to wingtip, is like a water jet.
The density of the tank itself, never changes. The fuel may add mass to the wing, but not density to the aluminum. As soon as that tank is punctured, the integrity of the mass of fuel is lost.
The density of the tank itself, never changes. The fuel may add mass to the wing, but not density to the aluminum. As soon as that tank is punctured, the integrity of the mass of fuel is lost.
The only explanation is that the car was secretly prepped in advance to weaken its structure and hundreds of nano-scale demolition charges were placed at critical points. Did you really imagine water could crush steel, like a hot knife through butter?If "integrity" of the mass of fuel is needed to break the steel, please explain how this happened: