• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Well, this politcal cartoon sure is spot on.

snoop_doxie said:
Maybe you could explain what this means?
Click to expand...

It means: You're looking too deeply. As a response to anyone that wants to ask the same question again and again, and not accept the answer. Capiche? (the model is a 22 year old Addie Juniper btw, I did one of her first adult style photoshoots)
 
Last edited:
But why choose a nude woman who appears to be hanging from something to convey that sentiment?
 
River said:
I seriously did not look that deeply at it. I simply picked an image that looked like one that would depict the hearing in one image. Anything further than that would be made up.
Click to expand...

Ok so the answer is that you picked a random image from the hearings, then, because any image from the hearings sums them up?
Edited by kmortis: 
Removed previously moderated content and response
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sorry, River. I defended you once when I thought people overreacted to something you said, but this is not the same. You have not answered the question. Hevneren tried to throw you a life jacket but failed as his answer made no sense.
If you cannot explain how your picture sums up how people feel about the hearing that's because it doesn't. I suggest you stop digging because the hole is only getting deeper.
 
I'm not sure why River is withholding the explanation of the fake picture, or why anybody else is acting as if they didn't already know (or even didn't realize that it's not only fake but also not even trying to appear non-fake). Is this another round of the "don't be the first to state the obvious, from either side" game?

Fine, I'll do it: it was a claim that she's lying, with those other people around her controlling her, telling her what to say.

There, can we move on to the next step after that shocking revelation, or do yall want to just keep dancing around it for more pages?
 
Delvo said:
I'm not sure why River is withholding the explanation of the fake picture
Click to expand...

I wasn't under the impression that it's fake.

or why anybody else is acting as if they didn't already know (or even didn't realize that it's not only fake but also not even trying to appear non-fake). Is this another round of the "don't be the first to state the obvious, from either side" game?
Click to expand...

Is it really so hard to believe that I didn't understand what the **** he was saying with the picture?

There, can we move on to the next step after that shocking revelation, or do yall want to just keep dancing around it for more pages?
Click to expand...

If you can't stand it, get out or put us all on ignore.
 
Delvo said:
I'm not sure why River is withholding the explanation of the fake picture, or why anybody else is acting as if they didn't already know (or even didn't realize that it's not only fake but also not even trying to appear non-fake). Is this another round of the "don't be the first to state the obvious, from either side" game?

Fine, I'll do it: it was a claim that she's lying, with those other people around her controlling her, telling her what to say.

There, can we move on to the next step after that shocking revelation, or do yall want to just keep dancing around it for more pages?
Click to expand...


Fake? Please do tell. That image was screen capped from video of the hearing.

Also, again for the record in my opinion it appeared to sum up the hearing in one image. Anything deeper than that would be made up on my part in a later explanation. You and others make me think about doing just that, just to return the troll. ;) You're given the real answer, and you refuse to accept it. Go figure.
 
applecorped said:
Cartoons now? Lol. Right up there with pink pussy hats
Click to expand...

Were those the ones that bros for weeks and even months afterward were characterizing as "hats in the shape of female genitalia" during internet arguments because they never looked at news photos long enough realize that they were just knit caps with cat-ear shapes on them?
 
River said:
Dude, I have no idea what you're talking about with perjury trap. I answered your question a number of times. If you ask again, I'm going to consider you likely insane as if you expect a different answer from the same question and likely ignore. I posted the picture because: it's an actual image from the trial that depicts the trial in one image.
Click to expand...
Okay, I'll try one more time before resorting to the ignore list.

What does this image depict and why did you feel it sums up the meeting?

Why is this so hard to just answer?
 
Delvo said:
I'm not sure why River is withholding the explanation of the fake picture, or why anybody else is acting as if they didn't already know (or even didn't realize that it's not only fake but also not even trying to appear non-fake). Is this another round of the "don't be the first to state the obvious, from either side" game?

Fine, I'll do it: it was a claim that she's lying, with those other people around her controlling her, telling her what to say.

There, can we move on to the next step after that shocking revelation, or do yall want to just keep dancing around it for more pages?
Click to expand...

From a different angle help?

1538072555925.jpg

Obviously a powerful image from the hearing.

Clipboard.jpg
 
Last edited:
johnny karate said:
On average, how many times do you lie during a job interview?
Click to expand...
I was hired without a job interview.

It's quite common for candidates to exaggerate or embellish their experience and minimize their past transgressions. I've interviewed and hired before and took that into consideration during the process. I don't want the interview to turn into a confessional. I'd prefer to mine for data on topics of interest.

As an example to one of my previous statements; The statement that I've hired before is truthful, however, it lacked details. I've hired one individual in my professional career. You would not have been able to reliably infer that without asking.

What specifically did Brett lie about and what evidence do you have to support that you believe that he lied?

Have you knowingly and willfully participated in an interview where at least one decision maker announced their prejudice and bias before the process began, thereby denying you a fair opportunity?
 
This one is quite good, too:

picture.php
 
ServiceSoon said:
What specifically did Brett lie about and what evidence do you have to support that you believe that he lied?
Click to expand...


I don't know if this has been posted already, but Nathan J. Robinson of Current Affairs magazine has an excellent article detailing the many lies which Kavanaugh pretty clearly told under oath during the hearings.

How We Know Kavanaugh Is Lying

My apologies -- I don't have time to list all of Kavanaugh's lies which Robinson identifies in the article, or even a fraction of them, as I'm short on time at present. I can try to return much later tonight and present a list then.
 
ServiceSoon said:
I was hired without a job interview.

It's quite common for candidates to exaggerate or embellish their experience and minimize their past transgressions. I've interviewed and hired before and took that into consideration during the process. I don't want the interview to turn into a confessional. I'd prefer to mine for data on topics of interest.

As an example to one of my previous statements; The statement that I've hired before is truthful, however, it lacked details. I've hired one individual in my professional career. You would not have been able to reliably infer that without asking.

What specifically did Brett lie about and what evidence do you have to support that you believe that he lied?
Have you knowingly and willfully participated in an interview where at least one decision maker announced their prejudice and bias before the process began, thereby denying you a fair opportunity?
Click to expand...

I suggest you read the SCOTUS thread where they are discussed in detail.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom