• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

We Will Not Be Silenced 2008

Funny how "anecdotes" suddenly are very important if it's a democrat making an allegation against any republican or conservative. Then the liberal mantra is crucify the bastard.

The fraud in the selection of Alvin Greene is better docutmented than this crap. The paper ballots are exactly the opposite of the electronic results. Obvious electronic malfunction. probably intentional.

And how do you know they have no evidence? Have you seen the documentary?

I do not see how they have any documentation of anything. Democratic events are always a cat round-up. And what the the hell was this bit of a supposed Democrat snivelling about not being heard while sitting in front of what appears to be a Gadsden Flag?

I smell teabaggers..
 
You know, I follow several news sources, and I've not seen a peep about this.

You claiming there never was anything in the news about Obama's legions committing fraud in the primaries? Because that would be false. For example ... from 2008 ...

http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/obama-voter-fraud/2008/10/27/id/326134

Hillary Backers Decry Massive Obama Vote Fraud

27 Oct 2008

With accusations of voter registration fraud swirling as early voting begins in many states, some Hillary Clinton supporters are saying: “I told you so.”

Already in Iowa, the Obama campaign was breaking the rules, busing in supporters from neighboring states to vote illegally in the first contest in the primaries and physically intimidating Hillary supporters, they say.

Obama’s surprisingly strong win in Iowa, which defied all the polls, propelled his upstart candidacy to front-runner status. But Lynette Long, a Hillary supporter from Bethesda, Md., who has a long and respected academic career, believes Obama’s victory in Iowa and in 12 other caucus states was no miracle. “It was fraud,” she told Newsmax.

Edited by Darat: 
Over long quote snipped.


… snip (and you can read the rest) ...

:D
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Funny how "anecdotes" suddenly are very important if it's a democrat making an allegation against any republican or conservative.
What are you talking about? Where did democrats make allegations against a republican or conservative in this story?

Or you allowed to bring in other situations when you get upset when other people do in your other threads?

And how do you know they have no evidence?
I don't. I do know that they didn't provide any.

Have you seen the documentary? Have you talked to them? Even their website has material suggesting there is hard evidence.
Suggesting there is hard evidence? You mean they don't even provide it on their own website?

Did you bother to even look at it before completely dismissing it?
Yes, but I needn't have bothered. Given your past, it doesn't take a psychic to predict that you would present CT nonsense.

Admit it, Upchurch ... you just don't want to go there because Obama is now *your man*. ;)
Can you admit that you will buy into anything, no matter how flimsy, so long as it is anti-Obama?
 
So you are claiming that Gina Gaston and the folks in her video are all liars? :rolleyes: I'll tell you who is the gullible one around here, Upchurch. :D

Oooh! Oooh! Oooh! Is it the guy who believes this story without a scrap of evidence backing up their assertions? What about the guy who trots out every anti-Obama meme in the belief that everyone single one deserves a thread regardless of whether or not it actually has any impact on anything at all whatsoever?
 
Last edited:
How do you know they didn't turn it over to authorities? Like Holder's DOJ?

Because if one has verifiable evidence of criminal activity, the next stop after being stonewalled by the Department of Justice is the media.

Since no major media outlets seemed to have picked up on the story, this leads to one of two conclusions:

1) There is a massive cover-up involving the government and the media.

2) These people have no evidence of their claims.

Since I am a sane, rational person, I'm going with option 2.

How about you?
 
Is this another Fox story that's really outdated and actually something that happened during Bush's adminstration? Y'know, like the Black Panther scandal?
 
Big red flag when the documentary maker says that she went down to Texas to prove the claims of voter fraud wrong. That's a common claim used by conspiracy theorists, to make their case seem stronger. See, initially she was skeptical of the claims but then when the evidence was presented, she became convinced.

I am sure that the Obama people wrestled for every opportunity they could find. IIRC, Skeptic Ginger (formerly Skeptigirl) put up a post about her extremely negative experience with the Obama folks in her local caucus back in 2008; it was a pretty interesting read.

But did it really change the election? No, I don't believe that. Maybe in terms of whom the Democratic nominee was, but assuredly not in the general. To point out the obvious, is it really likely the Black Panther thugs turned away a lot of McCain voters in Philly?
 
What are you talking about? Where did democrats make allegations against a republican or conservative in this story?

Or you allowed to bring in other situations when you get upset when other people do in your other threads?

Just so there is no confusion, here is what BAC said in this thread:
Funny how "anecdotes" suddenly are very important if it's a democrat making an allegation against any republican or conservative. Then the liberal mantra is crucify the bastard. :D

And here is what BAC has complained about in other threads quite recently:
So just because this thread is not about Bush, Obama's DOJ can not possibly have done anything "racist" here. :rolleyes:
Except I didn't ask that in this thread. It's not a question in the OP, nor was it even mentioned until post #45 when someone from your side of this debate raised it.

I really wish you would stay on topic, David. :D
Read the OP. It clearly defines the topic. Since I have been severely reprimanded multiple times for discussing equivalent Clinton activities on threads with some point to make about Bush, I think it only fair that those who support Obama not be allowed to divert threads on his administration into discussions of Bush and company.

So, which is it, BAC? Stay on topic or wander wherever the thread of discussion takes us?
 
I heard about these actions at the time; there was some mention of it on conservative political blogs as well as on the Democratic "Puma" blogs. I wouldn't be surprised if Axelrod et al engaged in dirty tactics, but really - dirty tactics in a primary? Who'd believe something like that?

This being 2010, and the title reading 2008, I don't believe that there is "another Obama scandal brewing" here. Sorry.
 

Back
Top Bottom