We need an independent investigation!

[Reheat]

It's amazing how you are able to take the most innocuous comment and attack it with your halting, childish prose.

Claiming to be a technical writer for NIST, then proving that you don't know how to spell well known proper names correctly, misidentifying a common aircraft and then arguing about it is NOT an innocuous comment, bird brain....

ETA: All of this in addition to preposterous claims that bear no semblance to reality and you have the audacity to call it innocuous.

 

[T.A.M.]

As it is, it looks as if our alleged "NIST TECHNICAL WRITER" was a hit and run BS artist.

TAM

 

[Bananaman]

red:

halting, childish prose.

Halting...childish...prose. Interesting choice of words. Now, not only are you a sceptic on all things 9/11, but also an English professor.

Attacking someone's writing style on a discussion board is low. I've done it, but I don't like doing it. Seeing someone do it who has little to brag about in that department themselves is low.

Sorry. Don't like it in myself, and I still do it, dammit, very, very occasionally. Don't like it in others.

Discussion boards are where we argue or preferably discuss topics and, as an incidental plus, notice we're getting better at communicating with the written word. It just happens, and bloody marvellous it is too.

Just try and avoid the 'you can't write' rant, as hard as it is.

Bananaman.

 

[RedIbis]

Claiming to be a technical writer for NIST, then proving that you don't know how to spell well known proper names correctly, misidentifying a common aircraft and then arguing about it is NOT an innocuous comment, bird brain....

ETA: All of this in addition to preposterous claims that bear no semblance to reality and you have the audacity to call it innocuous.

Beachnut responded to my post, which I consider innocuous since I questioned prof smartpants' legitimacy from my first post in this thread. Which makes your comments, and your use of the word "you" all the more bizarre.

 

[RedIbis]

red:


Halting...childish...prose. Interesting choice of words. Now, not only are you a sceptic on all things 9/11, but also an English professor.

Attacking someone's writing style on a discussion board is low. I've done it, but I don't like doing it. Seeing someone do it who has little to brag about in that department themselves is low.

Sorry. Don't like it in myself, and I still do it, dammit, very, very occasionally. Don't like it in others.

Discussion boards are where we argue or preferably discuss topics and, as an incidental plus, notice we're getting better at communicating with the written word. It just happens, and bloody marvellous it is too.

Just try and avoid the 'you can't write' rant, as hard as it is.

Bananaman.

It's funny when you guys call for civility, when your most prominent posters, Beachnut among them, resist no opportunity for continuous insults.

You teach a dog to stop nipping at your heels by putting your boot in his snout a few times.

 

[Reheat]

You teach a dog to stop nipping at your heels by putting your boot in his snout a few times.

If that's true then why doesn't it work on a bird beak?

 

[johnny karate]

It's funny when you guys call for civility, when your most prominent posters, Beachnut among them, resist no opportunity for continuous insults.

You teach a dog to stop nipping at your heels by putting your boot in his snout a few times.

It's funny when you complain about a so-called lack of civility when so many of your posts are nothing but lies and hypocrisy.

If such behavior is your idea of "civility", then don't be surprised if no one here gets all that concerned if you accuse them of being "uncivil".

 

[Bananaman]

Red:

It's funny when you guys call for civility, when your most prominent posters, Beachnut among them, resist no opportunity for continuous insults.

You teach a dog to stop nipping at your heels by putting your boot in his snout a few times.

Noted. Reading comprehension: nil.

Bananaman.

 

[bob the analyst]

If this is really your first few posts here on jref, after making such claims, you will have to verify your credentials. Since you appear to disagree with the conclusions of the report, please be prepared to answer an onslaught of questions, most fair, but some won't be.

If you are being dishonest, that will be exposed rather quickly as well.

What would you like to know, but more importantly, why would you like to know? Is their some motive behind you poking your nose into someone's business and their confedentiality?

If you try, dare try to invade my personal privacy, I will not only report you to JREF, but also to ICE and the DHS as well as the NSA and FBI.. American hating psychopaths like you need to be dealt with promptly and correctly.

 

[RedIbis]

Red:


Noted. Reading comprehension: nil.

Bananaman.

I just came across this doozy. You really might be the very last person on this forum who should whine about what's a low blow.

I won't be wasting any more keystrokes on this, seeing as how all of this is about to get snipped and dropped into the Inferno.

 

[johnny karate]

If this is really your first few posts here on jref, after making such claims, you will have to verify your credentials. Since you appear to disagree with the conclusions of the report, please be prepared to answer an onslaught of questions, most fair, but some won't be.

If you are being dishonest, that will be exposed rather quickly as well.

What would you like to know, but more importantly, why would you like to know? Is their some motive behind you poking your nose into someone's business and their confedentiality?

If you try, dare try to invade my personal privacy, I will not only report you to JREF, but also to ICE and the DHS as well as the NSA and FBI.. American hating psychopaths like you need to be dealt with promptly and correctly.

The ironing, she is delicious.

 

[RedIbis]

What would you like to know, but more importantly, why would you like to know? Is their some motive behind you poking your nose into someone's business and their confedentiality?

If you try, dare try to invade my personal privacy, I will not only report you to JREF, but also to ICE and the DHS as well as the NSA and FBI.. American hating psychopaths like you need to be dealt with promptly and correctly.

Oh this is a terrible work. The guy's not even trying. You went for the "American hating psychopaths" bit way too early.

 

[TexasJack]

If you try, dare try to invade my personal privacy, I will not only report you to JREF, but also to ICE and the DHS as well as the NSA and FBI.. American hating psychopaths like you need to be dealt with promptly and correctly.

So what did you do when your privacy was invaded, you know the tapping of your phone and e-mails?

 

[Bananaman]

Red:

I just came across this doozy.

Red, I didn't realise you were that slow. Don't you understand the difference between blasting someone's writing style and what they are trying to say? Good grief.

Bananaman.

 

[Grizzly Bear]

How much does a janitor make there? Which department was cleanest?


Here, I'll make it easy for you:

A partial (but long) list of agencies, organizations, and experts responding to and investigating the 9/11 attacks.–

Provide evidence that one scientist or engineer who worked on the NIST WTC reports agrees with your statements above, and I'll quit my debunking and apologize to all truthers.

If he does, then I'll review my design education and promptly abandon my current university major.

 

[Darat]

Stop the personal attacks and insults or face suspension.

Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Darat

 

[T.A.M.]

What would you like to know, but more importantly, why would you like to know? Is their some motive behind you poking your nose into someone's business and their confedentiality?

If you try, dare try to invade my personal privacy, I will not only report you to JREF, but also to ICE and the DHS as well as the NSA and FBI.. American hating psychopaths like you need to be dealt with promptly and correctly.

Well that is easy. Simply tell us what part of the NIST report (with chapter and page number) is incorrect, what they got wrong, and why. Even better, given your inside knowledge of alleged stonewalling, tell us which parts you or others were told to ignore, or whitewash.

This should be good.

TAM

Oh and ps, I am not sure there is anything you or any of your listed agencies could do to me up here in Canada, but give it your best shot dude.

 

[Horatius]

What would you like to know, but more importantly, why would you like to know? Is their some motive behind you poking your nose into someone's business and their confedentiality?

Gee, why ever would someone want to know the actual identity of someone claiming personal inside knowledge of one of the greatest cover-ups in history?


Gee, let me think......

 

[T.A.M.]

For what it is worth, no one here has asked to know the identity of NIST Scientist smartpants. Rather, we are interested in you confirming you are who you say are. This is easily done.

When I had someone challenge my credentials as a Physician, I simply provided the moderators with sufficient information and data to prove who I was. They knew I wished to keep my anonymity, so they merely posted that I was indeed a physician.

So merely provide your proof to the mods, and if it is sufficient, I am sure they will let all of us know.

TAM

 

[BCR]

What would you like to know, but more importantly, why would you like to know? Is their some motive behind you poking your nose into someone's business and their confedentiality?

If you try, dare try to invade my personal privacy, I will not only report you to JREF, but also to ICE and the DHS as well as the NSA and FBI.. American hating psychopaths like you need to be dealt with promptly and correctly.

If you post it on the internet bubba, it ain't private no more. I for one don't care about your personal privacy, but if you are going to claim expertise or special knowledge, then you are going to have to back it up. ICE, DHS, NSA and the FBI could care less about your personal problems and I would suggest anyone wanting Big Brother to fight their battles for them is about as non-American as it gets.