We Don't Go By That

epix said:
MY evidence? Can you at least comprehend the basics?



You are missing the point, because you constantly ignore the frame in which the picture sits. Now, you need to debate your close-minded case with Herb Greenberg and not me: http://video.cnbc.com/gallery/?video=3000069622

Why would Herb accuse Bernanke that way he did, when he had plenty of opportunity to do that before? Look again at the question. Don't you see something rather special? If you don't, you have no business lecturing others about the lack of evidence of God. We don't listen to the blind.
Click to expand...

So you admit that Bernake was not stealing and that you made a false premise?

I am asking why you said that Bernake broke the 8th commandment. I seem to recall you posted this thread not Herb Greenberg.
 
epix said:
MY evidence? Can you at least comprehend the basics?



You are missing the point, because you constantly ignore the frame in which the picture sits. Now, you need to debate your close-minded case with Herb Greenberg and not me: http://video.cnbc.com/gallery/?video=3000069622

Why would Herb accuse Bernanke that way he did, when he had plenty of opportunity to do that before?
Click to expand...
What is the minimum interest rate he has to set so that he isn't stealing?

Look again at the question. Don't you see something rather special?
Click to expand...
Oh yes, there's something special all right. Say, are the voices that only you can hear still talking to you?

If you don't, you have no business lecturing others about the lack of evidence of God. We don't listen to the blind.
Click to expand...
Which god(s)?
 
epix said:
And so that's the 8th Commandment hypothesis that tends to establish an option to why some rational financial analysts suddenly came up with quite irrational comparison. See, the popes are not the only mammals around here to get "inspired" by God. So remember:

Ben Bernanke = eleven (11) letters
Bernanke = eight (8) letters

That means the hypothesis will be tested on 11/8 (November 8) of this year. But you may start collecting canned food before that date.
Click to expand...
God was very unhappy with my financial doomsday prophecy scheduled to take place on November 11, this year. He complained that I didn't bother to justify it. He said that the date 11/8 was a part of a prophecy that already came true, but some folks in the government missed it and so they have received a reminder in the form of that "stealing" hoopla. This is how it was supposed to go . . .

The date November 8, or 11/8 was extracted by the Last/First association. (See the definition in Revelation.) It was considered fact by counting:

Since "Ben Bernanke" and "Bernanke" are collection of 11 and 8 letters, the words that start with E are therefore "eleven" and "eight" respectively. Hence 11/8 --> November 8.

But the date referred to November 8, 2002. Remember that the name of the Fed chairman have identical initials B. B., and since B=2 in the alphabet, 2002 is congruent to B00B. (I knew that but couldn't locate the bra.)

On that date, Nov. 8, 2002, the Federal Reserve - through Ben Bernanke - finally admitted its big share in the Great Depression which caused lots of misery around at that time.

Bernanke is particularly interested in the economic and political causes of the Great Depression, on which he has published numerous academic journal articles. Before Bernanke's work, the dominant monetarist theory of the Great Depression was Milton Friedman's view that it had been largely caused by the Federal Reserve's having reduced the money supply. In a speech on Milton Friedman's ninetieth birthday (November 8, 2002), Bernanke said, "Let me end my talk by abusing slightly my status as an official representative of the Federal Reserve. I would like to say to Milton and Anna [Schwartz, Friedman's coauthor]: Regarding the Great Depression. You're right, we did it. We're very sorry. But thanks to you, we won't do it again."
Click to expand...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ben_Bernanke

Regarding that prophecy and those similar ones: they don't contain an explicit information, just a general character. Objects are encoded. The only specific info are the dates of occurrence.

That doesn't mean that Nov. 8, 2013 will stay dormant. It all depends on my ability to steal the key to the Causation Room. But stealing anything on the 8th day of the month means bad luck. That's due to the 8th Commandment. But there is a lovely time configuration that selects Nov. 8, 2013 as a special day. And that could make God to "forget" the key to the Causation Room on the table.
:)
 
Epix, do you believe it is acceptable to bear false witness for the purposes of proslytization?
 
epix said:
God was very unhappy with my financial doomsday prophecy scheduled to take place on November 11, this year. He complained that I didn't bother to justify it. He said that the date 11/8 was a part of a prophecy that already came true, but some folks in the government missed it and so they have received a reminder in the form of that "stealing" hoopla. This is how it was supposed to go . . .

The date November 8, or 11/8 was extracted by the Last/First association. (See the definition in Revelation.) It was considered fact by counting:

Since "Ben Bernanke" and "Bernanke" are collection of 11 and 8 letters, the words that start with E are therefore "eleven" and "eight" respectively. Hence 11/8 --> November 8.

But the date referred to November 8, 2002. Remember that the name of the Fed chairman have identical initials B. B., and since B=2 in the alphabet, 2002 is congruent to B00B. (I knew that but couldn't locate the bra.)

On that date, Nov. 8, 2002, the Federal Reserve - through Ben Bernanke - finally admitted its big share in the Great Depression which caused lots of misery around at that time.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ben_Bernanke

Regarding that prophecy and those similar ones: they don't contain an explicit information, just a general character. Objects are encoded. The only specific info are the dates of occurrence.

That doesn't mean that Nov. 8, 2013 will stay dormant. It all depends on my ability to steal the key to the Causation Room. But stealing anything on the 8th day of the month means bad luck. That's due to the 8th Commandment. But there is a lovely time configuration that selects Nov. 8, 2013 as a special day. And that could make God to "forget" the key to the Causation Room on the table.
:)
Click to expand...
OK. I will throw out a proposal. Nobody responds, unless and until epix gets professional help. This is not an ad hom. I truly believe that by indulging his posts, we are simply enabling it to continue. Yes. it's easy to do, sure he might be a Poe, but seriously guys, this has become too strange.

Get help, epix. I am out of this thread.
 
abaddon said:
OK. I will throw out a proposal. Nobody responds, unless and until epix gets professional help. This is not an ad hom. I truly believe that by indulging his posts, we are simply enabling it to continue. Yes. it's easy to do, sure he might be a Poe, but seriously guys, this has become too strange.

Get help, epix. I am out of this thread.
Click to expand...

Good idea. Epix, we're concerned for your mental well being.
 
abaddon said:
OK. I will throw out a proposal. Nobody responds, unless and until epix gets professional help. This is not an ad hom. I truly believe that by indulging his posts, we are simply enabling it to continue. Yes. it's easy to do, sure he might be a Poe, but seriously guys, this has become too strange.

Get help, epix. I am out of this thread.
Click to expand...
I disagree. Fundamentalism is not a mental disease. Taking the bible literally is not a mental disease. Numerology is not a mental disease.

Now, we may view these stances as idiotic or misinformed or ignorant (I certainly do) but those conditions do not justify a diagnosis of mental illness. In fact, it could be considered an insult. There are millions of fundamentalists, numerologists and literalists in the USA. Nobody seriously suggests they get professional help. Why epix?
 
epix said:
How can e__x "obviously" indicate Exodus when e is the first letter and x the last letter in the expression? :confused:
Click to expand...
It's obvious. e-p-i-x. But "p" is a nasty word so we are left with e-i-x. But "i" is not biblical because the bible is all about Jesus. So we are left with e-x. So abaddon is right.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom