• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

We Don't Go By That

epix said:
What's that business with Ben Bernanke?

You can't ask the local atheists, because they are not in touch with reality. They think that some obscure blogger accused Bernanke of stealing money, but the reality is that there have been professional financial analysts who discussed the issue on the news.

No one accused the Fed Chairman of stealing - his activity has been likened to stealing. But why now, when he kept the prime rate low before and no one said anything about stealing?

We must investigate . . .


http://www.euronews.com/2013/03/16/pope-francis-calls-for-more-austere-catholic-church/

Is that a God-inspired call? Something is going down, because it doesn't happen often that Christianity inspires Judaism.


http://www.newyorker.com/online/blo...anke-lectures-gop-on-austerity-economics.html

Well, the tandem-system Francis & Ben is busy talking austerity. We better take a look if God got something to do with that. Once again we use God's definition in Revelation for the purpose of highlighting.

I am the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last, the Beginning and the End.

Of course, the definition will be affected by the keyword "austerity." That means you can't have both Alpha and Omega. And since after Omega comes nothing, and nothing is what Francis of Assisi - who so much inspired the current pope - loved the most, we chose the ending. But definition must be complete, and so we put after ending the beginning (like the beginning of a new life in heaven - sitting on a cloud forever and ever). Now we are ready to associate. Here is an example: The ending letter of END is D. What is the word that starts with D?

E N D____?

:confused:

How do the mortals call the end of life?

E N D E A T H

Very good.

Now we do "Ben Bernanke":

BEN BERNANKE_________?

There is a word that starts with E and is associable with the name or with the person who carries the name. What would be the best fit?

If there are contenders, then there is a chance of a dispute as to which word fits the best. And so it's better to come up with a word which represents a fact. Since "Ben Bernanke" is a name made up of 11 letters, we can solve accordingly.

BEN BERNANKELEVEN

That's a coincidence which makes names like that special. But what does that 11 mean in the real terms? Did God "arm" it, or not?


http://www.newyorker.com/online/blo...anke-lectures-gop-on-austerity-economics.html

Oh yes! He armed that 11 big time.

Both Francis and Ben were talking austerity, but that doesn't involve the pope in this particular case, because he has only one name - Francis. And so, due to the austerity, we use just one of the Bernanke's name. "Ben" is way too austere, so we use his last name for the next step. (The quote above doesn't use the full name Ben Bernanke. That actually decides.)

BERNANKE_______?

You know why Homo sapiens is such an advanced animal? It has the capability of learning to repeat. So the good chance is that Man the Wise will count again, like previously, to make the association in the form of a fact.

BERNANKEIGHT

That's right. The last name Bernanke is made of eight letters. The problem is that, unlike in the case of 11, there is no significant reference to number 8 and Bernanke on the Internet. Unleeeeees . . .


What happened to Bernanke's first name? How come it's not included?

I don't know, Heavenly Father. It was there, now it's not there.

Do you think someone stole it?

It is a strong possibility. Lol. The 8th Commandment is hardly a prevention against stealing these days - as it has been all the time, I suppose.

http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/dail...aling-depositors-more-bernanke-170851783.html


And so that's the 8th Commandment hypothesis that tends to establish an option to why some rational financial analysts suddenly came up with quite irrational comparison. See, the popes are not the only mammals around here to get "inspired" by God. So remember:

Ben Bernanke = eleven (11) letters
Bernanke = eight (8) letters

That means the hypothesis will be tested on 11/8 (November 8) of this year. But you may start collecting canned food before that date.
Click to expand...

tl;dr.

Give it to me in the manner of Barney, the purple dinosaur.
 
epix said:
Ben Bernanke = eleven (11) letters
Bernanke = eight (8) letters

That means the hypothesis will be tested on 11/8 (November 8) of this year. But you may start collecting canned food before that date.
Click to expand...

Hi Epix

Can you explain why this logical?

Why does the length of one's name (with, and then without, first name) have any bearing on future events? Why November 8th and not August 11th? Why not Exodus 8:11? Those double B's have to mean something, and B is often used to signify the 2nd thing in a list, and exodus is the 2nd book of the bible.....

"The frogs will leave you and your houses, your officials and your people; they will remain only in the Nile."

Maybe god is trying to tell us to rid our houses of frogs? oh my god, I bought my kids a leapfrog!!!!!! IT MUST BE THE WORK OF THE DEBIL!!!!!!
 
epix said:
Read the OP.
Click to expand...

I did, you reference a blogger, is that he basis of theft? Or do you actually not know how to state in say five sentences why Bernake is engaged in theft?

Seriously Epix, you can't even explain it yourself?

Lets see if you understand something here, the blogger states that Bernake is keeping interest rates low therefore some investors are not making as much profit as they could.

SO:
-Bernake makes choice that potentially keeps people from maybe making more money

and that is theft?

Because now theft is NOT taking money from someone but now if preventing someone from maybe making money?
 
Last edited:
epix said:
So the atheists after consulting with their own near-omniscience asserted that the accusation of Ben Bernanke breaching the Eighth Commandment was due to an unprofessionally formed opinion of "some blogger" who headlined it without thinking twice.
Click to expand...
Excuse me?
Bernake keeing interest rates low is theft how?
Please explain exactly how that works.

Or is all you have more empty rhetoric?
perhaps you did not even read the bog post?
Sure, Bernanke didn't trip over a penal code - he and the likes are too smart for that. But since the atheists are stuck in the brutally primitive antiquity (or the aquity?) due to the teaching of the "new," militant atheism, they can't realize that time has changed and that the 8th can be breached with an utmost finess.
Click to expand...
Then you should be able to explain exactly how Bernanke removed money from people in the process of theft.


(The Roman Catholic Church would have to remain influential for at least another couple of millenia before it could amass $700 billion of the bailout money that were needed to plug the hole through which the amount disappeared in a less than a decade.)

Whether Bernanke sinned is an open question.
http://video.cnbc.com/gallery/?video=3000069622

But the atheists don't recognize any open questions when they happen to reach their own irreversible conclusion. But not all tomatoes are rotten: the atheists came to the defense of a theist(!), and so I won back the whole M82 galaxy in Ursa Major. God kind of knew that I tricked him, because epix must fail all the time, otherwise the atheists would hardly play a defense lawyer for a theist.
Click to expand...


Excuse me Epix, maybe you could exactly explain how Bernake took the money, as if theft, from people?

Did you actually read the blog post or just the headline?
 
Last edited:
RoboTimbo said:
No, that's a person's definition, remember? God(s) are just make believe, like you make believe you have conversations with some of them.

Why do theists stray so far from the truth?
Click to expand...
Revelation 22:13 is not something a person could come up with. The odds of non-relative attribute are acrophobicallly high. You have nothing on your side but arguments riddled with fallacies and so you will continue to repeat them ad nauseum.
 
devnull said:
Hi Epix

Can you explain why this logical?

Why does the length of one's name (with, and then without, first name) have any bearing on future events? Why November 8th and not August 11th? Why not Exodus 8:11? Those double B's have to mean something, and B is often used to signify the 2nd thing in a list, and exodus is the 2nd book of the bible.....

"The frogs will leave you and your houses, your officials and your people; they will remain only in the Nile."
Click to expand...
It doesn't have any bearing when God isn't involved. But it would be a mistake to think that any John Doe who was born on 4/3 is the next Jesus Christ, or that any Heather Doe who died on 7/3 went straight up to heaven. Coincidences of this kind must occur and even if they may appear statistically significant (you can actually find out), you take into consideration only those people who became influential. God sometimes uses the number of letters in the names to establish future dates. It depends on the circumstances what method he chooses. But the argument must be simple - easy to see and shouldn't involve too many transformations.

The question why November 8 and not August 11 relates to the order of the names. Why Ben Bernanke and Bernanke, and why not Bernanke and Ben Bernanke?

The initial circumstance, the talk about austerity, naturally organizes the names as

1) Ben Bernanke (= 11 letters)
2) Bernanke (= 8 letters)

If you used to spend $11 daily on certain items, then, due to the austerity measures, you get only $8 to buy your stuff with. Since Bernanke works for the US government and in the the USA the MM/DD/YY format is used, the particular names encoding refers to 11/8 or November 8.

Why not Exodus 8:11?

I didn't have time to do the entire decoding. Of course that passage is involved. Do you think that God wouldn't check the Bible for possible associations? He will actually do what you did; he would select passages with Chapter 8, Verse 11 looking for something funny like

The frogs will leave you and your houses, your officials and your people; they will remain only in the Nile."
Exodus 8:11

This passage is very hard to associate with the Fed Chairman. Actually it is rationally impossible. But you know what Jesus said: "What is impossible with man is possible with God." In other words, God will force things around to form the association through mind hacking:



That's not that difficult to accomplish, because the folks involved are irrational by their origin (evolution) so they won't get suspicious that they are talking nonsense when they go public. It follows that sometimes is better to get info from God rather than to rely on a bunch of speaking monkeys - unless you know that the self-correcting system has been turned on.

Now the B's... From the above, can you solve by association the following?

1) Ben
2) Bernanke
3) B______?

Maybe god is trying to tell us to rid our houses of frogs? oh my god, I bought my kids a leapfrog!!!!!! IT MUST BE THE WORK OF THE DEBIL!!!!!!
Click to expand...

LOL. That's what Zerdin, the transitional god from Arpa Nebula, said after having studied the evolution of human species on his fact-finding visit to the solar system. God was deeply hurt when someone told him about Zerdin's comment.
 
epix said:
Hey, Foster, if you promise that you won't tell anyone, I let you into the works. Namely into the issue of what God also meant by that You shall not steal. There is a little prerequisite: I know that you are an atheist, but not all atheists are besieged by the inability of following a line when it changes its color. Finished kindergarten will do.

Alright. Now, first things first: the definition of God with a particular application.

I am the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last, the Beginning and the End.

T O R A H
You understand the reason for the selection, right?

You don't need those letters which the definition didn't select. So you get rid of them, but you do need to indicate that there is a space between T and H. You can actually use the kindly provided letter O to adjust it slightly to become zero.

T 0 H

Now convert the two letters T and H into numbers as well by using their order in the alphabet. (T=20 and H=8). After you are done, the result is

2 0 0 8

At this point, I bet that you have no problem to relate the two following expressions.

TORAH <----> 2008

Now remember that 2008 is also the subject to the definition of God.

TORAH <----> 2008
This highlight is very important, because Torah has many parts and you need to select one of them. You can tentatively associate 2 with the 2nd book of Torah, which is Exodus. But if you do that what does 8 stand for?

There is really no sure way of finding out, but suppose that 8 means the Eighth Commandment. (The Philonic and/or Talmudic order.) If it does, than the year 2008 is up for a review. We are looking for some action related to You shall not steal. . .

That's

really

ominous.

Hank Paulson is covering his eyes! Something is coming up, Foster - and it's not good.



$700,000,000,000! See, I told you.

Can you imagine it? Some godless person stole from the poor bankers $700 billion! As if there was no 2nd book of Torah with that 8th Commandment!

But the nation under one God showed its Christian kindness and helped out the poor Wall St. guys. :) Isn't that lovely, Foster?

Now there is a new pope who is talking austerity. He took his papal name after Francis of Assisi who preferred poverty over wealth and that made a saint out of him. So, it could be as early as the next year when this truly "remarkable" global financial system breaks - and probably for good. But the logical time is the year of 2015. It all depends on how much freedom God gives to the Bible-illiterate speaking monkeys who run the commercial and investment banks. Too much freedom means that they'll manage to screw up ASAP.

So don't tell anyone, Foster. It's supposed to be a sudden surprise, like that one in that year of ToraH. :)
Click to expand...

Have the corn gods returned?
 
epix said:
Revelation 22:13 is not something a person could come up with.
Click to expand...
Yes, it is. If you're saying it isn't something a rational person would come up with, then we agree.

The odds of non-relative attribute are acrophobicallly high. You have nothing on your side but arguments riddled with fallacies and so you will continue to repeat them ad nauseum.
Click to expand...
What was the fallacy? Or is that something else to add to the list of things you've made up?
 
Let's see, now.

epix

e__x

The "e" and the "x" indicate Exodus, obviously.
"e" is the fifth letter, "x" is the 24th.

Giving us Exodus 5:24.

Since Exodus 5:24 does not exist, this is proof that epix does not exist.

This is fun.
 
epix said:
It doesn't have any bearing when God isn't involved. But it would be a mistake to think that any John Doe who was born on 4/3 is the next Jesus Christ, or that any Heather Doe who died on 7/3 went straight up to heaven. Coincidences of this kind must occur and even if they may appear statistically significant (you can actually find out), you take into consideration only those people who became influential. God sometimes uses the number of letters in the names to establish future dates. It depends on the circumstances what method he chooses. But the argument must be simple - easy to see and shouldn't involve too many transformations.

The question why November 8 and not August 11 relates to the order of the names. Why Ben Bernanke and Bernanke, and why not Bernanke and Ben Bernanke?

The initial circumstance, the talk about austerity, naturally organizes the names as

1) Ben Bernanke (= 11 letters)
2) Bernanke (= 8 letters)

If you used to spend $11 daily on certain items, then, due to the austerity measures, you get only $8 to buy your stuff with. Since Bernanke works for the US government and in the the USA the MM/DD/YY format is used, the particular names encoding refers to 11/8 or November 8.

Why not Exodus 8:11?

I didn't have time to do the entire decoding. Of course that passage is involved. Do you think that God wouldn't check the Bible for possible associations? He will actually do what you did; he would select passages with Chapter 8, Verse 11 looking for something funny like

The frogs will leave you and your houses, your officials and your people; they will remain only in the Nile."
Exodus 8:11

This passage is very hard to associate with the Fed Chairman. Actually it is rationally impossible. But you know what Jesus said: "What is impossible with man is possible with God." In other words, God will force things around to form the association through mind hacking:



That's not that difficult to accomplish, because the folks involved are irrational by their origin (evolution) so they won't get suspicious that they are talking nonsense when they go public. It follows that sometimes is better to get info from God rather than to rely on a bunch of speaking monkeys - unless you know that the self-correcting system has been turned on.

Now the B's... From the above, can you solve by association the following?

1) Ben
2) Bernanke
3) B______?



LOL. That's what Zerdin, the transitional god from Arpa Nebula, said after having studied the evolution of human species on his fact-finding visit to the solar system. God was deeply hurt when someone told him about Zerdin's comment.
Click to expand...

This is madness.
 
abaddon said:
Let's see, now.

epix

e__x

The "e" and the "x" indicate Exodus, obviously.
Click to expand...
How can e__x "obviously" indicate Exodus when e is the first letter and x the last letter in the expression? :confused: Do you know what the word obviously mean? Obviously (pun intended) not.

I show you the meaning of the word possibility (letter case not sensitive.)

ex_____?

There is a possibility that 'ex' are the starting letters of Exodus.
Could that choice become preferential? And if so, why?

Um, that's not a question for you. I don't think that atheism needs another round of embarrassement right after devnull's total failure.
 
Dancing David said:
So where is your evidence of Bernake engaging in theft?
Click to expand...

MY evidence? Can you at least comprehend the basics?

epix said:
No one accused the Fed Chairman of stealing - his activity has been likened to stealing. But why now, when he kept the prime rate low before and no one said anything about stealing?
Click to expand...

You are missing the point, because you constantly ignore the frame in which the picture sits. Now, you need to debate your close-minded case with Herb Greenberg and not me: http://video.cnbc.com/gallery/?video=3000069622

Why would Herb accuse Bernanke that way he did, when he had plenty of opportunity to do that before? Look again at the question. Don't you see something rather special? If you don't, you have no business lecturing others about the lack of evidence of God. We don't listen to the blind.
 
epix said:
How can e__x "obviously" indicate Exodus when e is the first letter and x the last letter in the expression? :confused: Do you know what the word obviously mean? Obviously (pun intended) not.

I show you the meaning of the word possibility (letter case not sensitive.)

ex_____?

There is a possibility that 'ex' are the starting letters of Exodus.
Could that choice become preferential? And if so, why?

Um, that's not a question for you. I don't think that atheism needs another round of embarrassement right after devnull's total failure.
Click to expand...

I made up my own rules, just like you.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom