was OKC an inside job?

Revolutionary91 said:
When did I claim McVeigh wasnt involved?
Click to expand...
In the second post on this thread, you said that OKC was an inside job. Now you say "McVeigh did this on the anniversary of Waco. He was acting in revenge for the machine gunning of women and children, by the government."

If you have some consistent hypothesis, then I, like D'rok the Lacone, am at a loss to guess what it is.
 
Last edited:
Dr Adequate said:
In the second post on this thread, you said that OKC was an inside job. Now you say "McVeigh did this on the anniversary of Waco. He was acting in revenge for the machine gunning of women and children, by the government."

If you have some consistent hypothesis, then I, like D'rok the Lacone, am at a loss to guess what it is.
Click to expand...

He was provocateured by the FBI, just like in the 1993 wtc bombing. Why do people feign such confusion on this forum?
 
Revolutionary91 said:
He was provocateured by the FBI, just like in the 1993 wtc bombing. Why do people feign such confusion on this forum?
Click to expand...

The FBI wanted to blow up some civil servants in order to get revenge for their own bungled siege at Waco?
 
You mean provoked, not provocateured.
You have already been corrected once in this thread.
Thats a nonsense word isnt it?
 
Last edited:
Revolutionary91: In light of the fact that the military have been shown (as per the evidence now provided) to rent vehicles, has your opinion of the photograph of the Ryder truck in the military base changed at all?

Further, are you simply saying that you refuse to apologise to DGM for falsely accusing him of being a liar? I’ll admit, this sort of thing fascinates me; so, out of interest, what makes you think it’s OK to do that -- what is it about you that you feel exempts you from common decency?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom