Was Darwin Wrong?

This has no philosophical (or theological) interest then.
Off to the science forum wid ya.
 
lifegazer said:
As a matter of fact, I bleedin' well am.
Here, have a nice, refreshing cup of cute, furry bunny.
bunnies.gif


OK, I'll be good now [/derail]
 
The more I see those bunnies, the more I want to put them in a blender and drink the bloody sludge out of those cups.
 
From the linked article
So one can imagine a creationist spying the magazine and excitedly grabbing it, assuming that a magazine as prestigious as National Georgraphic has now been forced to take creationism seriously.


:D According to cbish's post above, that line is fairly prophetic...

Posted by cbish
Funny story

A co-worker of mine returned last week from a science teacher conference in San Jose. A booth was handing out these editions of National Geographic........A Creationist booth!!

Apparently, they had failed to actually open the magazine.

Again, :D
 
c4ts said:
The more I see those bunnies, the more I want to put them in a blender and drink the bloody sludge out of those cups.
Sickening, aren't they? Too bad I don't own a blender.
 
cbish said:
Funny story

A co-worker of mine returned last week from a science teacher conference in San Jose. A booth was handing out these editions of National Geographic........A Creationist booth!!

Apparently, they had failed to actually open the magazine.:D :D
Some days I wonder why I get up in the morning.

And then, I see this.
 
lifegazer said:
As a matter of fact, I bleedin' well am.

I thought your philosophy was all about trying to get humanity to unite.

I'm feeling a leetle bit alienated by you.
 
katlefiya said:
I thought your philosophy was all about trying to get humanity to unite.

I'm feeling a leetle bit alienated by you.
Then burn sucker. LOL

Just jokin'.

Only God exists - if you knew this, you would realise that only attitudes could be alienated from one another.
 
lifegazer said:
Only God exists - if you knew this, you would realise that only attitudes could be alienated from one another.
In other words, god is a solipsist.
Well, I always knew there'd be one...
 
Kimpatsu said:
In other words, god is a solipsist.
Well, I always knew there'd be one...
God has to be a solipsist by logical default since 'God' is omnipresent.
If God exists, then nothing else does.

= only One truly exists.
 
lifegazer said:
God has to be a solipsist by logical default since 'God' is omnipresent.
If God exists, then nothing else does.

= only One truly exists[/i].

Prove it.

Oh, that's right - you can't.
 
lifegazer said:
God has to be a solipsist by logical default since 'God' is omnipresent.
If God exists, then nothing else does.
Non sequitur. Anyway, as Dr. Johnson demonstrated by kicking a rock, "I refute (solipsism) thus!"
As I kick back, I know I exist, which by your reasoning means that god doesn't. Unless you admit that I'm god.
 
zaayrdragon said:
Prove it.

Oh, that's right - you can't.
Proof here is self-evident: 'God' cannot be omnipresent whilst "other things" are reported to have an independent existence of their own.

Therefore, if a God exists, God is a solipsist.
 
Kimpatsu said:
Non sequitur. Anyway, as Dr. Johnson demonstrated by kicking a rock, "I refute (solipsism) thus!"
Dr. Johnson sensed himself kicking a sensed-rock and felt sensed-pain.
All sensations occur within.

= Dr. Johnson proved Jack.
As I kick back, I know I exist, which by your reasoning means that god doesn't. Unless you admit that I'm god.
I do admit that you are God.
 

Back
Top Bottom