• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Was Darwin Wrong?

This has no philosophical (or theological) interest then.
Off to the science forum wid ya.
 
lifegazer said:
As a matter of fact, I bleedin' well am.
Here, have a nice, refreshing cup of cute, furry bunny.
bunnies.gif


OK, I'll be good now [/derail]
 
The more I see those bunnies, the more I want to put them in a blender and drink the bloody sludge out of those cups.
 
From the linked article
So one can imagine a creationist spying the magazine and excitedly grabbing it, assuming that a magazine as prestigious as National Georgraphic has now been forced to take creationism seriously.


:D According to cbish's post above, that line is fairly prophetic...

Posted by cbish
Funny story

A co-worker of mine returned last week from a science teacher conference in San Jose. A booth was handing out these editions of National Geographic........A Creationist booth!!

Apparently, they had failed to actually open the magazine.

Again, :D
 
c4ts said:
The more I see those bunnies, the more I want to put them in a blender and drink the bloody sludge out of those cups.
Sickening, aren't they? Too bad I don't own a blender.
 
cbish said:
Funny story

A co-worker of mine returned last week from a science teacher conference in San Jose. A booth was handing out these editions of National Geographic........A Creationist booth!!

Apparently, they had failed to actually open the magazine.:D :D
Some days I wonder why I get up in the morning.

And then, I see this.
 
lifegazer said:
As a matter of fact, I bleedin' well am.

I thought your philosophy was all about trying to get humanity to unite.

I'm feeling a leetle bit alienated by you.
 
katlefiya said:
I thought your philosophy was all about trying to get humanity to unite.

I'm feeling a leetle bit alienated by you.
Then burn sucker. LOL

Just jokin'.

Only God exists - if you knew this, you would realise that only attitudes could be alienated from one another.
 
lifegazer said:
Only God exists - if you knew this, you would realise that only attitudes could be alienated from one another.
In other words, god is a solipsist.
Well, I always knew there'd be one...
 
Kimpatsu said:
In other words, god is a solipsist.
Well, I always knew there'd be one...
God has to be a solipsist by logical default since 'God' is omnipresent.
If God exists, then nothing else does.

= only One truly exists.
 
lifegazer said:
God has to be a solipsist by logical default since 'God' is omnipresent.
If God exists, then nothing else does.

= only One truly exists[/i].

Prove it.

Oh, that's right - you can't.
 
lifegazer said:
God has to be a solipsist by logical default since 'God' is omnipresent.
If God exists, then nothing else does.
Non sequitur. Anyway, as Dr. Johnson demonstrated by kicking a rock, "I refute (solipsism) thus!"
As I kick back, I know I exist, which by your reasoning means that god doesn't. Unless you admit that I'm god.
 
zaayrdragon said:
Prove it.

Oh, that's right - you can't.
Proof here is self-evident: 'God' cannot be omnipresent whilst "other things" are reported to have an independent existence of their own.

Therefore, if a God exists, God is a solipsist.
 
Kimpatsu said:
Non sequitur. Anyway, as Dr. Johnson demonstrated by kicking a rock, "I refute (solipsism) thus!"
Dr. Johnson sensed himself kicking a sensed-rock and felt sensed-pain.
All sensations occur within.

= Dr. Johnson proved Jack.
As I kick back, I know I exist, which by your reasoning means that god doesn't. Unless you admit that I'm god.
I do admit that you are God.
 

Back
Top Bottom