Oh right, the hi-tech thermitic red-gray chips are actually, 'just paint'
Yes, they are. They red layers contain distinct minerals:
- rhombic shaped grains that consist of iron and oxygen - Harrit e.al. agree that this is iron oxide. In particular, these are hematite, a mineral of Fe2O3.
- stacks of hexagonal platelets that consist of Si and Al in equal amounts, and oxygen. Kaolinite, a mineral of aluminiumsilicate, has just that chemical composition (Al2Si2O5(OH)4)))
- also, there are traces of strontium and chromium
These minerals are embedded in an organic matrix.
Compare this to the composition of LaClede stamdard primer, that was painted on the floor joists, which had a higher total surface area than the perimeter columns:
- Iron oxide: 55%
- Aluminiumsilicate: 44%
- Strontium Chromate: 4%
- Vehicle: An organic matrix consisting of expoxy amine
A perfect match!
The gray layers consisted mainly of iron on oxygen, with traces of manganes.
And guess what? The steel that this LaClede paint was painted on was typically a steel grade whose main alloying element is manganese! A perfect match (with oxygen, because the top few µm of steel surfaces are always oxidised).
and the squibs compressed air. (absurd explanations to anyone who has looked)
Can you show us that squibs like the one you saw at the WTC are seen in controlled demolitions as the explosives are going off?
Hardly a match.
However, you will often find such squibs from building collapses as the result of air being pushed out of collapsing floors. Try searching for "verinage demolition" on youtube, which is a demo technique that workd entirely by gravity, without explosives. Notice the squibs!
and what about wtc 7's freefall?
Can you show us that CDs produce freefalls, and natural collapses do not?
or the 1100 MISSING HUMAN BEINGS at ground zero..??
What is yout theory? Where did those 1100 go?How does that observation inform you about the collapse mechanism?
the 2800f a week an a half later??
the 100 day fires
First of all: Which source do you have for this measurement of 2800f? I believe you don't actually have one.
But supposing it's correct: What is your theory? How does this observation inform you about the collapse mechanism? be specific, I want a complete chain of reasoning from intact towers through collapse to post-collapse conditions.
What do you think pulverized the concrete? How much energy was needed to pulverize the concrete, how much was available from gravity alone, and how much was added, in your opinion, to gravity?
evidence from molten metal from 8 different places..
Molten
metal? Why is molten
metal anomalous in an ordinary fire? Are you aware that there are many metals that melt at perfectly ordinary fire temperatures? In fact, many people over here have a tradition of melting metals in their home over candles on New Years Eve. Do they use high tech military grade candles?
If you mean "steel" instead of "metal", then be informed that we have been through all that hearsay about molten steel plenty of time and found no corroboration, only conjecture and witnesses speaking outside of their competence.
But let's assume there was molten metal: What's your theory? Please explain both collapse mechanism and molten steel found some time after the collapses in one complete, consistent theory!
(And do not forget that you think the building was so thoroughly destroyed that 1100 human beings were pulverized, as was the concrete; you need to explain how whatever you think was capable of melting steel before the collapse was still capable of melting bulk amouns of steel after the collapse; or how already molten steel was not widely dispersed and consequently rapidly resolidified during the collapses)
These were supposedly 'office fires' and 'gravity' in highly redundant structures. wake up dude
Were the towers still highly redundant after the plane crashes?
How much fire can a building take before redundancy has melted away?
Are you supposing office highrises are indestructable, totally immune to fire?
