Was 9-11 an inside job or not?

[Good Lt]

It's a yes or no question, Troofers. This is similar to the "straight answer" thread, in that I want you to cut down on the nonsense, the distractions, your inability to see the forest through the trees, etc.

Just answer the question with a simple yes or no. Can you do it?

Was 9-11 an inside job or not?

 

[Obviousman]

Hey, I'm not a twoofer but have the compelling need to answer.

No. Not at all.

To expand on this:

Is there a coverup regarding 9/11? I think so. It's people covering the decisions they made with respect to intelligence, actions, etc regarding 9/11. Not a government conspiracy to orchestrate 9/11. Just some people realising they made very bad decisions and trying very hard not to be held accountable for it.

Could 9/11 have been organised by the government / rogue agencies? Yes though unlikely, and I have not seen anything that would sway my opinion in this regard. I think it is possible (but not necessarily probable) that an organisation recruited the 9/11 terrorists and enabled them to carry out the 9/11 attacks. A front organisation that recruited jihadists and got them to carry out the attacks thinking they were doing it on behalf of a Islamic extremist group.

 

[LastChild]

It's a yes or no question, Troofers. This is similar to the "straight answer" thread, in that I want you to cut down on the nonsense, the distractions, your inability to see the forest through the trees, etc.

Just answer the question with a simple yes or no. Can you do it?

Was 9-11 an inside job or not?

We would need an investigation that's not an inside job to find that out.

 

[Good Lt]

We had one.

Try again. Yes or no.

 

[Unsecured Coins]

nope.

 

[LastChild]

We had one.

Try again. Yes or no.

That is my answer.

What was your answer to my yes or no question again?

Did they take a no bid contracts because they don't make money on war?

I can't speak for them - maybe you should ask them yourself.

At least my answer is honest.

 

[twinstead]

We would need an investigation that's not an inside job to find that out.

Oh for crying out loud. Who could possibly conduct another investigation who is both qualified to do so (thus acceptable to us) and acceptable to you?

Your claim that 'all you want is another investigation' is transparent; what you want is confirmation of your theories, actual truth be damned.

 

[Bell]

I just recieved NWO memo 11/11/07XTR2.1A (high priority) that asked me to answer this question as "NO".

 

[R.Mackey]

Personally, I was wondering where the OP was going, but after LastChild's non-answer, I see the brilliance of it.

Well played.

 

[Diagoras]

Yes, 9-11 was an inside job. Inside of Al-Qaeda.

 

[Axiom_Blade]

We would need an investigation that's not an inside job to find that out.

That's pretty sad that all the arguments boil down to "Well, we need another investigation, because the first one just wasn't good enough." Although I have never seen a denier give any evidence for that, either.

 

[pomeroo]

That is my answer.

What was your answer to my yes or no question again?

Did they take a no bid contracts because they don't make money on war?



At least my answer is honest.

Defense industries made profits from World War II. Was that a reason not to fight? Explain.

 

[Axiom_Blade]

Yes, 9-11 was an inside job. Inside of Al-Qaeda.

I WANT IT ON A T-SHIRT.

 

[LastChild]

Personally, I was wondering where the OP was going, but after LastChild's non-answer, I see the brilliance of it.

Well played.

You were wondering? Really?

I thought you knew everything.

 

[Diagoras]

I really don't understand why some Truthers are so afraid to say what's on their mind: the government did it. Yeah, being an ex-Truther, I can kind of understand the fear that other people will immediately pounce on that idea and you might not be able to fully defend yourself with good arguments, but that's what you have to do if you take your ideas seriously. Put up or shut up.

 

[R.Mackey]

You were wondering? Really?

I thought you knew everything.

If you really thought that, you wouldn't raise so many impertinent questions -- you'd just ask me what I thought.

 

[Unsecured Coins]

You were wondering? Really?

I thought you knew everything.

I do know everything. I just can't remember it all at once.

 

[twinstead]

Defense industries made profits from World War II. Was that a reason not to fight? Explain.

Companies made profit from WWII? HA! That means Pearl Harbor was an inside job!!!!111111!

 

[defaultdotxbe]

We would need an investigation that's not an inside job to find that out.

to follow this logic, dont we need an investigation of the investigation to find out if the investigation was an inside job?

then an investigation of the investigation to investigate the investigation

then an investigation of THAT investigation....

 

[EventHorizon]

to follow this logic, dont we need an investigation of the investigation to find out if the investigation was an inside job?

then an investigation of the investigation to investigate the investigation

then an investigation of THAT investigation....

Allow me to translate LastChild's statement from Woo to English for you.

Woo:

"We would need an investigation that's not an inside job to find that out."

English:

"We need more investigations until we get one in which the conclusion fits my preconceived notions about 9/11."