Moderated Views on George Galloway.

Zeuzzz said:
Valid direct crisisisms about Galloway: NONE!
Click to expand...
I don't usually encounter such willful ignorance outside of "Conspiracy Theories".

But I guess shutting your eyes while sticking your fingers in your ears chanting "I can't hear you" is the best you can do to defend your boy Galloway.
 
WildCat said:
I don't usually encounter such willful ignorance outside of "Conspiracy Theories".

But I guess shutting your eyes while sticking your fingers in your ears chanting "I can't hear you" is the best you can do to defend your boy Galloway.
Click to expand...


Okay lets start again, one valid point (that I haven't already addressed) starting now.
 
Zeuzzz said:
Okay lets start again, one valid point (that I haven't already addressed) starting now.
Click to expand...

You haven't addressed Galloway's denial of the Tiananmen Square massacre. You denied that he said what he said, you denied that proof was offered that he was wrong, and now you deny that the criticism was ever leveled.

You, Zeuzzz, are simply a liar.
 
Ziggurat said:
You haven't addressed Galloway's denial of the Tiananmen Square massacre. You denied that he said what he said, you denied that proof was offered that he was wrong, and now you deny that the criticism was ever leveled.

You, Zeuzzz, are simply a liar.
Click to expand...


I answered that in quite detail, you may have missed it.

post 203
post 207
 
Zeuzzz said:
I answered that in quite detail
Click to expand...

No you didn't. You posted long quotes. Not the same thing. What you did was try to defend something other than what Galloway actually said, because what he actually said is indefensible. And the crux of the quotes? That the dead weren't killed in Tiananmen Square, but only around it. Quite the ringing endorsement of Galloway's denial.
 
Ziggurat said:
No you didn't. You posted long quotes. Not the same thing. What you did was try to defend something other than what Galloway actually said, because what he actually said is indefensible. And the crux of the quotes? That the dead weren't killed in Tiananmen Square, but only around it. Quite the ringing endorsement of Galloway's denial.
Click to expand...


But factually accurate, as said by the very media people in the square, dont you think? that no-one was killed there, and people who were there were let go peacefully. The violence happened in other places. So he was right.
 
Zeuzzz said:
But factually accurate, as said by the very media people in the square, dont you think? that no-one was killed there
Click to expand...

No. The term is used to denote what happened that day in more than just the square itself. Galloway is denying that there was a massacre, not simply that it didn't happen in the square proper. Here's more audio of him in denial from a different date:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GYL9GhpwpJw
You will note that not only does he try to make your point about it not being in the square, he STILL clings to the claim that he's never seen a single photo of a single dead body, and he DOESN'T specify from within the square itself when he makes that point, right after a caller tells him people were being killed just outside the square. He is trying to deny that there was any massacre at all.

Galloway is in denial about the Chinese government's crimes. And you're in denial about Galloway.
 
Ziggurat said:
It used to be that you would need to kill a significant fraction of a target population for it to be considered genocide. Not any more. Genocides just aren't what they used to be. It's like some sort of weird moral inflation. Or deflation. :confused:
Click to expand...

A shame that one's death by the evil hands of some racist entity like Zionism is devalued becuase your part of a total that is less than number x. :rolleyes:
 
Zeuzzz said:
Likewsie :D

I think more people should watch the videos in the OP, and see his full testimony. Is utter class. The senate look like they dont know what hit them.
Click to expand...

That's what made me almost urinate myself laughing!!! Galloway showed up their complete incompetence easily.

Classic stuff!!! :D:D
 
haha, had you seen the footage before or did you just watch it for the first time?

First time I watched it I was laughing so hard :)
 
From as far away as possible, just like all the other MPs and American equivalents, members of Congress.
 
Ziggurat said:
No. The term is used to denote what happened that day in more than just the square itself.
Click to expand...


Really? Who says this? How far out of the square are you still considered in-fact in the square?

Galloway is denying that there was a massacre, not simply that it didn't happen in the square proper. Here's more audio of him in denial from a different date:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GYL9GhpwpJw
You will note that not only does he try to make your point about it not being in the square, he STILL clings to the claim that he's never seen a single photo of a single dead body, and he DOESN'T specify from within the square itself when he makes that point, right after a caller tells him people were being killed just outside the square. He is trying to deny that there was any massacre at all.

Galloway is in denial about the Chinese government's crimes. And you're in denial about Galloway.
Click to expand...


What would you define a masacre? Death-wise.
 
Zeuzzz said:
Post in this page that misrepresent Galloway: #282, #285

Irrelvant posts not about galloway: #281, #283, #284, #286, #287, #288, #289, #290, #291, #292, #293, #295 (actually pointed out this irrelivant stuff should split, props!) #297, #298, #299

Vaild posts about Galloway: #294, #296

Valid direct crisisisms about Galloway: NONE!

Keep it up peeps :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

I have already reported the rabid, derailing Israel/Palestein posters.

However, you are lying again. I have shown plenty to criticize Galloway for.
 
Tin Foil Timothy said:
Those members of the Senate that Galloway demolished look clueless. They were obviously used to fabricating evidence against people that weren't quite so strong at fighting back.

I laughed my ass off watching him make them look like complete retards. :)
Click to expand...

Making those clowns look stupid does not the man make. Even you could do that.

That you think he is great says more.
 
Zeuzzz said:
noticed you ignored this earlier,

List of Israeli assassinations
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Israeli_assassinations



Thats gonna create quite a lotta anger, isn't it? Could we maybe make a comparison here between the ideology of Israels Kidon and Hamas?
Click to expand...

This is a list of terrorists assassinated by the IDF, similar to US tactics in killing members of al-Qaeda.

So, a comparison can be made between Israeli and American "ideologies"
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom