Video: Bombs Going Off Before The 2nd Plane Hits?

This may have been mentioned but its worth repeating if so.
Whoever planted the "explosives" did they know the planes were due to hit? Was it just a coincidence two planes hit the towers the same day as Smoking man was due to denotate them.If so why bother detonating?The planes are obviously doing the job anyway(bringing destruction).
Secondly how many demolition jobs, conspiracybeliever, have you seen where the charges were put halfway up a building? On a corner even?
 
dissonance said:
If there were explosions, wouldn't someone have noticed them on 9/11, when every station on television was playing the videos of the planes hitting the towers and the towers burning and the towers collapsing over and over and over again? How is it possible that no one noticed them that day? Why is it you only see them now, years later, with poor quality online video?
Click to expand...

quantimbioelectromagnetismfragilisticexpealidocious coverup!

The JEWS! THE JEWS!!
 
I got it...

The crashing planes were mass induced hallucinations, (they probably used Geller to accomplish this)...

Then they added images of the planes by computer trickery to everything filmed to hide the explosives going off...

And i know they are watching me...

DB
 
conspiracybeliever said:
There are flashes on the corners of both towers. I pointed that out pretty early on. The same flashes are evident in this video of the North tower.
Click to expand...

Do you actually believe, without laughing in our faces, that the people who «supposedly» orchestrated this abomination would risk a pyrotechnic light show in front of billions of people?
 
Last edited:
Pardalis said:
Do you actually believe, without laughing in our faces, that the people who «supposedly» orchestrated this abomination would risk a pyrotechnic light show in front of billions of people?
Click to expand...
Oh, sure. A laser light show. The only reason you can't recognize it is that the tapes didn't pick up that Led Zepplin's Kashmir was playing loudly (and mysteriously) throughout downtown that day.
 
De_Bunk said:
I got it...

The crashing planes were mass induced hallucinations, (they probably used Geller to accomplish this)...

Then they added images of the planes by computer trickery to everything filmed to hide the explosives going off...

And i know they are watching me...

DB
Click to expand...

Never mind that! I want the computer "they" used to superimpose the planes and falling towers on live television with! To pull that off within 2 hours max from the first hit, they have HAD to have something awesome under that CPU!
 
Pardalis said:
Do you actually believe, without laughing in our faces, that the people who «supposedly» orchestrated this abomination would risk a pyrotechnic light show in front of billions of people?
Click to expand...


Particularly one that seemed to have no effect whatsoever?

Wasn't the whole point of postulating explosives that the burning airliner could not have melted steel and crushed concrete? If these teeny-weeny explosives did that, then why didn't the building fall right then?

It strains credibility!!! ;)
 
aggle-rithm said:
Particularly one that seemed to have no effect whatsoever?

Wasn't the whole point of postulating explosives that the burning airliner could not have melted steel and crushed concrete? If these teeny-weeny explosives did that, then why didn't the building fall right then?

It strains credibility!!! ;)
Click to expand...

Well, if we keep shooting down his pet theories, he's gonna have to move the goalposts to have anything to blather about.
 
My city doesn't let people set off black cats, cherry bombs, and M60s within the city limits for precisely the reasons aggle-rithm states. ;)
 
aggle-rithm said:
Particularly one that seemed to have no effect whatsoever?

Wasn't the whole point of postulating explosives that the burning airliner could not have melted steel and crushed concrete? If these teeny-weeny explosives did that, then why didn't the building fall right then?

It strains credibility!!! ;)
Click to expand...


Actully I ask, why use explosives at all?? From my post in the "what really happened on 9/11 thread"

If my math is right, and if anyone sees a flaw in it, please let me know.

B-25, Mass - 11000 Kg, velocity 3200 Kph or 889 Mps
707, Mass - 119000 Kg, velocity 2900 Kph or 805 Mps
767, Mass - 125000 Kg, velocity 9440 Kph or 2622 Mps

So be Kinetic Energy = 1/2*M*(V^2)

B-25 KE = 4.35E+09 J
707 KE = 3.86E+10 J
767 = 4.30E+11 J

A kilogram of TNT has 4.18E+06 J on energy in it.

That means the impact alone for
B-25 = 1039 Kg of TNT
707 = 9282 Kg of TNT
767 = 102713 of TNT

for the metriclly challenged
B-25 = 2290 pounds of TNT
707 = 20345 pounds of TNT
767 = 226444 pounds of TNT

Now this is just impact energy, the effects of fuel and other things burning is not taken into effect. But in short, why plant explosives when the impact of the 767 alone was on par with the energy released by 100 some odd tons of TNT???
 
Now this is just impact energy, the effects of fuel and other things burning is not taken into effect. But in short, why plant explosives when the impact of the 767 alone was on par with the energy released by 100 some odd tons of TNT???
Click to expand...
For the same reason why cell phone manufacturers keep putting in more and more needless features into their phones.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom