Video: Bombs Going Off Before The 2nd Plane Hits?

conspiracybeliever said:
There are flashes on the corners of both towers.
Click to expand...

The video you started with was from the impact of the second plane. Other videos and pictures proved that the little pixels you claimed were explosives were nothing of the sort.

You followed up with a video taking place over an hour later, when one of the buidings is collapsing.

I pointed that out pretty early on. The same flashes are evident in this video of the North tower.
Click to expand...

You are an idiot.

Why are explosives still going off if the building is already collapsing?

Why do you think that pixelation on a bright object is evidence of anything?

Why is it that you consider this to be evidence of more explosives rather than a demonstration of compression artifacts and lighting?

Could you be any more paranoid, clumsy and stupid?
 
If there were explosions, wouldn't someone have noticed them on 9/11, when every station on television was playing the videos of the planes hitting the towers and the towers burning and the towers collapsing over and over and over again? How is it possible that no one noticed them that day? Why is it you only see them now, years later, with poor quality online video?
 
conspiracybeliever said:
There are flashes on the corners of both towers. I pointed that out pretty early on. The same flashes are evident in this video of the North tower.
Click to expand...

Which is it, now ? Did they use explosives at the time the planes hit ? Or did they do so when the building collapsed ? And why would they use two sets of explosives ??
 
All you have to do is CB is show a different video, from a different angle at the same time, which shows the same event.

There are dozens of videos of this impact. Surely you can provide say two or three?
 
Another point that comes to mind: Why bother with the whole tons of explosives thing? There are much cheaper and easier ways to manipulate the public.
 
Erm...

Looking at the vid, those "explosions" are everywhere.

I've attached an image, taken from a print screen.

Edited - been trying to get another screenshot of the artefacts elsewhere. They are very clear when watching the vid but hard to capture.

On my PC at least, looks like there's little bombs going off all over NY.
 

Attachments

  • WTCscreen.jpg
    WTCscreen.jpg
    26.8 KB · Views: 163
Last edited:
There was a lot of debris from the first impact flying around. Could this be paper or one of the signal flags people hung out a window, and the wind blew to where they are in the video.

Just looking for other possibilities.
 
And of course, Roxdog will consider the existence of a myriad of possibilities as evidence for explosions being the only possibility.
 
Ok, figured out how to use Quicktime:
 

Attachments

  • WTCScreen2.jpg
    WTCScreen2.jpg
    38.6 KB · Views: 155
I'm trying to show another example of the pixellation - they are all over the vid, and not just on WTC1 and 2.

Not sure why I'm bothering really. Anyone deluded enough to think they are bombs won't be swayed by my little jpegs.

:D
 
CB, you will have to use high res clips to eliminate the pixelation. Once you have done that, you will have a case, if the "explosions" are still there.

As long as you present low res compressed clips, you will have the compression artifacts. As long as you have the artifacts, no one will listen to you. Whatever you see will be an "artifact".

So, present your case with high res clips.
 
Reeco said:
I'm trying to show another example of the pixellation - they are all over the vid, and not just on WTC1 and 2.

Not sure why I'm bothering really. Anyone deluded enough to think they are bombs won't be swayed by my little jpegs.

:D
Click to expand...

Thanks. Well not your JPEGS anyway, you're part of it.
 
I have a feeling Roxdog is employing some creative broad interpretation of "same time" and "same place".
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom