Denying the existence of some of the domestic violence against women is a bold stance. Will you also be laughing in the face of abused women, along with the rest of the world?
I'm sure you can see at least one key difference here, but I cannot. In both cases, someone is being asked to be kind so as to avoid unpleasantness, and in both cases that (allegedly costless) imposition involves actively suppressing what that person believes to be true.Yeah because that's the same thing.
How about the CDC?
It does, actually.CDC never states that violence can be a non-physical act in that article.
Sorry.
[Intimate Partner Violence] IPV can include any of the following types of behavior:
- Physical violence is when a person hurts or tries to hurt a partner by hitting, kicking, or using another type of physical force.
- Sexual violence is forcing or attempting to force a partner to take part in a sex act, sexual touching, or a non-physical sexual event (e.g., sexting) when the partner does not or cannot consent.
- Stalking is a pattern of repeated, unwanted attention and contact by a partner that causes fear or concern for one’s own safety or the safety of someone close to the victim.
- Psychological aggression is the use of verbal and non-verbal communication with the intent to harm a partner mentally or emotionally and/or to exert control over a partner.
Their VERY broad and vague definition of violence, is loony at best. Fraudulent and dishonest at worst.
Yeah, that's kind of a bull **** definition too, and for the same reasons I just described. What counts as "psychological aggression" (and thus "intimate partner violence") is entirely subjective. Is that a bug or a feature for you?
CDC never states that violence can be a non-physical act in that article.
Sorry.
I literally quoted the entire list.No, it only lists physical and sexual violence.
I literally quoted the entire list.
Again, only specifically lists sexual and physical violence.
No, verbal abuse is included.
Upchurch is right that lots of these sources categorize nonphysical acts as violence. He's wrong to assume that we should adopt such a definition ourselves on the basis of their authority.
Upchurch;14:p088007 said:
It doesn't call verbal abuse "violence".
There are many different types of violence that may be inflicted upon people by others with whom they have some kind of relationship, such as (ex-)partners, parents, other family members, teachers, colleagues, neighbours, carers, and spiritual/religious guides.1 Such violence is most often referred to as ‘domestic violence’ or ‘abuse’, and there are specific names for specific types, such as ‘neglect’ and ‘exploitation’. Whatever the type, violence can be of an emotional, physical, sexual, and/or financial nature, or witnessing any of these. We refer to all these types and forms of violence jointly as ‘violence’ in this article.
I've provided governmental definitions, legal definitions, medical definitions, and maybe a few other categories in there as well. Whose authority would you accept?Upchurch is right that lots of these sources categorize nonphysical acts as violence. He's wrong to assume that we should adopt such a definition ourselves on the basis of their authority.