US Officially Blames Russia

Crossbow said:
Once again, you are not making sense.

Everyone has written coherent posts to you. So if you cannot understand those posts, then you need to ask them for clarification.
Click to expand...

I would definitely like another party to chime in other than you and I. That hasn't happened in 35 posts, so I don't know if we will get the.
 
OK here's some speculation. Cohen claims he was in NY, not Prague. There is corroboration up to the 29th of August. But the meeting was described as occurring in August/September.

Cohen shows us his passport with no Cech stamp.

Another Cohen with the same birthday??? went to Prague.

Cohen is a dual citizen, Israeli and US. He would have 2 passports.

Let's see your Israeli passport Mr Cohen.

I remain open to either possibility, it was a different Cohen, or, Trump's attorney used his Israeli passport to cover his tracks.
 
Last edited:
BobTheCoward said:
Not great smoke. Manaforts payments were 4 years ago. Trump has been in favor of reproachment with Russia since the 80s. Even close ties to criminals does not really support that coordination with the criminals on specific crimes occurred.
Click to expand...

If you had read the report you would know there are accusations Russia and Trump interacting goes back 6-8 years.
 
logger said:
That was one of the best news conferences I've ever seen. Its getting difficult to predict how defeated the left will be after four years of this abuse.
Click to expand...

Well yeah, it does suck to be the recipient of abuse. That is why abuse as a strategy is generally rejected by most philosophies, societies, laws, organizations.....
 
logger said:
That was one of the best news conferences I've ever seen. Its getting difficult to predict how defeated the left will be after four years of this abuse.
Click to expand...


Nothing wrong with the press conference indeed. But you should stop using this silly "left" term. None of the resident PTrumpSD™ sufferers are "left", they are mere parrots of the propaganda narrative. Which happens to be liberal, both socially and economically, with the latter historically being a "right" position if we have to use these terms.
 
logger said:
So you reject people have this perception
Click to expand...

Wrong. I said that the perception is irrelevant to the reality.

do you also reject that perception showing itself through the vote against shillery?
Click to expand...

Again, irrelevant. I didn't ask you if people thought so. I asked you how you know it's TRUE.

Of course you made the often made mistake of putting words in my mouth
Click to expand...

Discerning the logical implications of your words isn't putting words in your mouth. If you state something as a fact, then you, logically, are saying that you know this fact to be true. I am asking you, clearly, how you know this. If you do not, then retract your claim.

I'm not denying anything, you're just having problems with understanding words because you so badly need your narrative.
Click to expand...

And you're just throwing irrelevancies around, like the word "narrative", which has absolutely no relation to the discussion.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom