US Officially Blames Russia

Trump's news conference: :jaw: :jaw: :jaw: :jaw: :jaw:

OMG, I guess it's what I expected, it's just that hearing blatant Newspeak is hard to believe. Subtle Newspeak, yes, but outright blatant Newspeak? I guess that's Conway's and Bannon's advice.
 
 
Typical Bannon style: Trump claiming BuzzFeed is the guilty party. BuzzFeed rep is hammering Trump back, Trump won't answer his question but I think BuzzFeed guy made his point.


Correction, it wasn't a BuzzFeed reporter calling Trump out, it was a CNN reporter.
 
Last edited:
Argumemnon said:
I asked first, if you want to play that silly game. Your question is irrelevant. That some people sense corruption doesn't mean that the corruption exists, or that it applies to a completely different agency. You're appealing to popularity.
Click to expand...

So you reject people have this perception, do you also reject that perception showing itself through the vote against shillery?


You stated that the "community" was corrupt as a statement of fact. That presupposes knowledge, unless you now want to argue that you pulled that from your nether regions.
Click to expand...

There is a sense? A perception? Of course you made the often made mistake of putting words in my mouth, revealing once again your confusion.
I also find it ironic that you try to go the "plausible deniability" route after so much railing against the government for engaging in such shady behaviours.
Click to expand...

I'm not denying anything, you're just having problems with understanding words because you so badly need your narrative.
 
Skeptic Ginger said:
Typical Bannon style: Trump claiming BuzzFeed is the guilty party. BuzzFeed rep is hammering Trump back, Trump won't answer his question but I think BuzzFeed guy made his point.
Click to expand...

He has your side in the palm of his hand! ;)

Yeah he got labeled fake news, good job!
 
What if Trump gave a news conference and no one came?

If they figured out all he's doing is dissing anyone who criticizes him and blatantly lying about everything else, but the news media can't help themselves. Like Charlie Brown, the news media keeps thinking Lucy won't pull the football away this time.
 
Last edited:
How does this reflect on Pence as well? Wouldn't it also taint him as well? Is Paul Ryan about to back into the Oval Office?
 
Donal said:
How does this reflect on Pence as well? Wouldn't it also taint him as well? Is Paul Ryan about to back into the Oval Office?
Click to expand...
It should, but you can bet (as I said earlier) the GOP run 'committees' will make sure to leave Pence out of it. They want a believable candidate. Get rid of POTUS, the public accepts the VPOTUS. But I don't think the public would accept a purely appointed by the Senate Paul Ryan POTUS when Clinton won the popular vote by almost 3 million votes.

OTOH, you may be on to something there.
 
Last edited:
CNN is siding with Trump that the intelligence report was all uncorroborated and BuzzFeed shouldn't have put it out there.

Excuse me Mr Tapper, but who makes you arbiter of releasing the actual report?
 
Skeptic Ginger said:
CNN is siding with Trump that the intelligence report was all uncorroborated and BuzzFeed shouldn't have put it out there.

Excuse me Mr Tapper, but who makes you arbiter of releasing the actual report?
Click to expand...

It should be released. If this is floating around the upper echelons of government, I want to know. I'm adult enough to understand unsubstantiated reports still have impact on government.
 
Let's look at the known facts:

Only negative stuff on Clinton was released to Wikileaks.

Tillerson and Manafort have ties to Russia.

Manafort got 12 million dollars that looked like a payoff be it a bribe or a reward.

Trump has been praising Russia and dissing NATO for a while now.

That's a lot of smoke coming from that gun even without the intelligence report.
 
Skeptic Ginger said:
Let's look at the known facts:

Only negative stuff on Clinton was released to Wikileaks.

Tillerson and Manafort have ties to Russia.

Manafort got 12 million dollars that looked like a payoff be it a bribe or a reward.

Trump has been praising Russia and dissing NATO for a while now.

That's a lot of smoke coming from that gun even without the intelligence report.
Click to expand...

Not great smoke. Manaforts payments were 4 years ago. Trump has been in favor of reproachment with Russia since the 80s. Even close ties to criminals does not really support that coordination with the criminals on specific crimes occurred.
 
BobTheCoward said:
More than one person here has brought up the Geneva convention to a post where I said congress hypothetically takes action to legalize torture. Argumemon specifically said "Are you aware that constitutional amendments and treaties are made in order to prevent such laws from ever coming into effects? " That would be an explicit contradiction to existing precedent. People do seem to be saying otherwise.
Click to expand...

Once again, you are not making sense.

Everyone has written coherent posts to you. So if you cannot understand those posts, then you need to ask them for clarification.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom