I have mentioned Len Ber MD a couple of times, most recently in post 1,831.
It was clear that he would be upset by the ODNI report (see post 1,746) and feel vindicated by the declassified 'Expert Panel' report from September 2022, recently obtained by lawyer Mark Zaid and Salon (see post 1,845). He also isn't happy with Robert Barthomew's most recent article in Skeptic Magazine, Newly Declassified Report on ‘Havana Syndrome’ Used the Wrong Criteria! (Mar 31, 2023), but kudos for linking to the article that he criticizes.
We have already seen Len Ber describe himself as "scientifically minded" and as "a man of evidence" (see post 1,752), so it shouldn't come as a surprise that he also considers himself to be "the biggest skeptic of all":
I think most skeptics appreciate assessment of data when trying to find out the truth about something, which is why we don't usually complain about it being superfluous, whatever that's supposed to mean in this context. And in the case of the 'Havana Syndrome', it has been a drag that guys like David Relman have dismissed other people's analyses with the argument that they themselves had access to patient data that others, i.e. their critics or the Cubans, weren't allowed to see.
It is obvious that Len Ber first of all wants to be believed and thus hates to be contradicted and loves any kind of confirmation, which are attitudes that don't get along with skepticism.
Len Ber quotes the "Four Core Characteristics of Anomalous Health Incidents" from the declassified report - as did I in post 1,845):
Earlier on (in Nicky Woolf's podcast series), it was claimed that retinal bleeding could only be caused by concussions, which wasn't true. Wikipedia told us about several non-violent and fairly common causes (see post 1,661). So it's worth looking up what else, besides concussion, may cause disruption of the blood-brain barrier, and it turns out that many other things do:
In other words, there is no need for 'immaculate concussions' to explain the phenomenon. I commented on the four core characteristics of anomalous health incidents in post 1,845, but let us take a closer look at #4, the absence of known environmental or medical conditions that could have caused the reported signs and symptoms, because it has one very obvious thing in common with mass psychogenic illness (MPI): "Qualities of MPI outbreaks often include: symptoms that have no plausible organic basis" (Wikipedia: Mass psychogenic illness: Causes)
The three other core characteristics are all explained by either hearing crickets (1 & 3) or very common, everyday symptoms "vertigo, loss of balance, and ear pain," and when dismissing mass psychogenic illness, it is worth noticing that "Dizziness or light-headedness" is #2 on the list of Mass psychogenic illness: Common symptoms (Wikipedia).
Len Ber's argument for dismissing MPI is as follows:
No, these are NOT extraordinary findings. The only thing that's extraordinary is that a whole group of people came down with this in Havana, but it has already become obvious that they came down with it because they were scared 1) by crickets and 2) by doctors telling them that they suffered from 'immaculate concussion' caused by a directed energy attack.
If Michael Hoffer is the one who convinced Len Ber that he suffers from 'immaculate concussion' as a result of having been attacked with microwaves, he should at least get his money back.
It was clear that he would be upset by the ODNI report (see post 1,746) and feel vindicated by the declassified 'Expert Panel' report from September 2022, recently obtained by lawyer Mark Zaid and Salon (see post 1,845). He also isn't happy with Robert Barthomew's most recent article in Skeptic Magazine, Newly Declassified Report on ‘Havana Syndrome’ Used the Wrong Criteria! (Mar 31, 2023), but kudos for linking to the article that he criticizes.
We have already seen Len Ber describe himself as "scientifically minded" and as "a man of evidence" (see post 1,752), so it shouldn't come as a surprise that he also considers himself to be "the biggest skeptic of all":
I love being a skeptic. I am the biggest skeptic of all. But I don’t engage in skepticism for the sake of skepticism. The latter is a religion, a belief that Occam’s Razor coupled with superfluous assessment of data merits the most reasonable explanation. It’s a mental trick, but it’s not the scientific method.
Dr. Bartholomew: "When in Doubt - Follow the Mainstream Science" (Len Ber MD on Havana Syndrome, on Substack, April 3, 2023)
I think most skeptics appreciate assessment of data when trying to find out the truth about something, which is why we don't usually complain about it being superfluous, whatever that's supposed to mean in this context. And in the case of the 'Havana Syndrome', it has been a drag that guys like David Relman have dismissed other people's analyses with the argument that they themselves had access to patient data that others, i.e. their critics or the Cubans, weren't allowed to see.
It is obvious that Len Ber first of all wants to be believed and thus hates to be contradicted and loves any kind of confirmation, which are attitudes that don't get along with skepticism.
Len Ber quotes the "Four Core Characteristics of Anomalous Health Incidents" from the declassified report - as did I in post 1,845):
And Len Ber adds:1. The acute onset of audio-vestibular sensory phenomena, including sound and/or pressure, sometimes in just one ear or one side of the head.
2. Other nearly simultaneous signs and symptoms such as vertigo, loss of balance, and ear pain.
3. A strong sense of locality or directionality.
4. The absence of known environmental or medical conditions that could have caused the reported signs and symptoms.
Moreover, transient rather than sustained elevation of biomarkers called neurofilament light chain (NfL) protein, and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) is indicative of acute disruption of blood-brain barrier in a fashion similar to brain injury caused by concussion. These proteins leak from the brain into the blood, where they are detected.
Earlier on (in Nicky Woolf's podcast series), it was claimed that retinal bleeding could only be caused by concussions, which wasn't true. Wikipedia told us about several non-violent and fairly common causes (see post 1,661). So it's worth looking up what else, besides concussion, may cause disruption of the blood-brain barrier, and it turns out that many other things do:
Vascular factors (stroke, hypertension, diabetes, etc.) and genetic factors (such as APOE4) cause defects in the vascular system leading to blood–brain barrier (BBB) impairment and oligemia (reduced cerebral blood flow), which finally correlate with dementia and neuronal degeneration.
Blood–Brain Barrier Breakdown: An Emerging Biomarker of Cognitive Impairment in Normal Aging and Dementia (Frontiers in Neuroscience/PubMed, Aug 19, 2021)
In other words, there is no need for 'immaculate concussions' to explain the phenomenon. I commented on the four core characteristics of anomalous health incidents in post 1,845, but let us take a closer look at #4, the absence of known environmental or medical conditions that could have caused the reported signs and symptoms, because it has one very obvious thing in common with mass psychogenic illness (MPI): "Qualities of MPI outbreaks often include: symptoms that have no plausible organic basis" (Wikipedia: Mass psychogenic illness: Causes)
The three other core characteristics are all explained by either hearing crickets (1 & 3) or very common, everyday symptoms "vertigo, loss of balance, and ear pain," and when dismissing mass psychogenic illness, it is worth noticing that "Dizziness or light-headedness" is #2 on the list of Mass psychogenic illness: Common symptoms (Wikipedia).
Len Ber's argument for dismissing MPI is as follows:
Is psychogenic illness the best explanation for these core characteristics when they appear together, plus the evidence of acute blood-brain barrier disruption? They say extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Likewise, extraordinary findings require extraordinary explanation. And these ARE extraordinary findings that taken together are “distinctly unusual”.
No, these are NOT extraordinary findings. The only thing that's extraordinary is that a whole group of people came down with this in Havana, but it has already become obvious that they came down with it because they were scared 1) by crickets and 2) by doctors telling them that they suffered from 'immaculate concussion' caused by a directed energy attack.
If Michael Hoffer is the one who convinced Len Ber that he suffers from 'immaculate concussion' as a result of having been attacked with microwaves, he should at least get his money back.
