Taarkin
Strider Style
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2006
- Messages
- 1,219
For my sanity's sake I'm just gonna believe it's a Trey Parker & Matt Stone parody.Warning: May induce vomiting.
For my sanity's sake I'm just gonna believe it's a Trey Parker & Matt Stone parody.Warning: May induce vomiting.
It's absolutely gross to see patriotism used as a weapon of bigotry. People like this make me distrust those who wrap themselves in the flag.
Thank you for verifiying my suspicions that this is about religious bigotry.
This is the face of the anti-Muslim leader of the "Stop the Mosque" campaign against Park51:
Evidence that Muslims don't "integrate quite well" in England, please.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Isn't it obvious?
Here's one article on the topic:
Deutsche Welle: In Europe, many Muslims live in 'parallel societies', in the States there's no such problem. Why are American Muslims so much better integrated?[
http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,,5522949,00.html
The reaction to the Danish cartoons in England was much more over the top than here in the states.
In the muslim world, a moderate believes you can take the West down without violence, while radicals believe it can only be done by jihad. That's the only difference between them.
http://www.actforamerica.org/
In the muslim world, a moderate believes you can take the West down without violence, while radicals believe it can only be done by jihad. That's the only difference between them.
http://www.actforamerica.org/
In the muslim world, a moderate believes you can take the West down without violence, while radicals believe it can only be done by jihad. That's the only difference between them.
http://www.actforamerica.org/
It was Islam that supplied 100% of the terrorist that attacked the twin towers, not Jews.
In the muslim world, a moderate believes you can take the West down without violence, while radicals believe it can only be done by jihad. That's the only difference between them.
http://www.actforamerica.org/
Let me ask you a hypothetical question. Let's assume that you are now the president of the U.S. and at the same time, Congress has said, "we have no idea what to do in this time of national crisis and therefore we grant the president unlimited power to make new laws on his own and to strike down current laws with no interference from the judicial branch of the federal government."
What would you do, Amb?
http://tv.gawker.com/5620154/jon-stewart-fox-news-omits-facts-to-further-its-fear+driven-narrative
More proof that this controversy is the most artificial artifice ever artificed.
One of the Saudi donators to the Cordoba Initiative I have seen mentioned on the anti-mosque blogs, is Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal’s Kingdom Foundation, the same guy owns 7% of News Corp., parent company of Fox News.
Will that mean the one million dollar donation from News Corp to the Republicans is terrorist money?
I'm not saying that Fox News should be denied their right to free speech or anything, but wouldn't it be more sensitive to the 9/11 families if they went off the air?Maybe it means that Fox News is just one big Terrorist Psy-Op - very concerning!
Let me ask you a hypothetical question. Let's assume that you are now the president of the U.S. and at the same time, Congress has said, "we have no idea what to do in this time of national crisis and therefore we grant the president unlimited power to make new laws on his own and to strike down current laws with no interference from the judicial branch of the federal government."
What would you do, Amb?
In the muslim world, a moderate believes you can take the West down without violence, while radicals believe it can only be done by jihad. That's the only difference between them.
http://www.actforamerica.org/
The mother of all CTs.Maybe it means that Fox News is just one big Terrorist Psy-Op - very concerning!
In the muslim world, a moderate believes you can take the West down without violence, while radicals believe it can only be done by jihad. That's the only difference between them.
http://www.actforamerica.org/