Truthers mis-speaking about physics

I think P'Doh caught all the references to this forum at the Screw Loose Change blog, and that's probably what motivated him to wander over.

Why he would, though, I have no idea. He had his head handed to him consistently in the SLC comments area, and there was no way he was going to do any better over here.

Has it been that long that you do not remember. I dared him to come over to JREF from the SLC blog. As fun and entertaining as he (and his reincarnations) has been, I do regret ever challenging him to it.

TAM:)
 
DC;

Care to be more specific as to what Sunder said that you find "dumb". I listened to his section on the collapses, and while it was "simplified" (likely keeping his audience in mind) I fail to see what part was "dumb".

TAM:)

he explained how the Towers collapsed in under 10 seconds.
but they never did.
i found it dumb he has fallen for the truther lie of fast collapsing towers, when they atleast needed 18 seconds.
 
Sadly. twoofers never understand, that it is not the expert saying "dumb stuff"!
It's the Twoofers interpretation of things that is lacking, in intelligent understanding!


Sad, but damn funny!

so you agree with Sunder from NIST, that the towers came down in only 8 and 11 seconds?
 
he explained how the Towers collapsed in under 10 seconds.
but they never did.
i found it dumb he has fallen for the truther lie of fast collapsing towers, when they atleast needed 18 seconds.

I think he was referring to the main structures of WTC1 and 2, not including the core columns. I believe times are somewhere abouts 9-14 seconds, depending on the footage used (this in itself is a problem). The columns remain standing for several seconds, giving the 18 second count.

I think his explanation of the fall of the "Structure minus the core columns" is sound.

TAM:)
 
I think he was referring to the main structures of WTC1 and 2, not including the core columns. I believe times are somewhere abouts 9-14 seconds, depending on the footage used (this in itself is a problem). The columns remain standing for several seconds, giving the 18 second count.

I think his explanation of the fall of the "Structure minus the core columns" is sound.

TAM:)

dunno, havent listen to it a long long time. would have to listen again to be sure.
but it doesnt matter :)
 
Has it been that long that you do not remember. I dared him to come over to JREF from the SLC blog. As fun and entertaining as he (and his reincarnations) has been, I do regret ever challenging him to it.

TAM:)

Thank you Dr. Frankenstein.
 
Has it been that long that you do not remember. I dared him to come over to JREF from the SLC blog. As fun and entertaining as he (and his reincarnations) has been, I do regret ever challenging him to it.

TAM:)

Yeah, it has indeed been that long (scary, huh?). I totally don't remember you being the one to invite him. I just remember writing him off as another sack of hot air, then one day seeing him over here. Tell you the truth, at the time I had no idea he was hell bent on becoming as epically resistent to reality as he's shown himself to be. He honestly didn't seem to have the argumentative chops to be even a decent truther to me; BG, Swing, Jenny Sparks, all those folks seemed to be much better at it than him. Paul just seemed to be a kid who's discovered a new thing to follow and tried to hang with the adults, but failed.

In retrospect, I see now that he did indeed have the characteristics to be a die hard truther, namely the ability to ignore logic and accept being beat time and time again. Thing is, I gave too much credit to too many conspiracy addicts from back then because I felt a lot of them simply were ignorant of the reality. In late 2006, I didn't actually internalize that they were ignorant on purpose, i.e. because they actively ignored the truth. You learn a lot in 3+ years.

So, how does it feel to be the one responsible for bringing the current sock puppet record holder over? ;):D
 
so you agree with Sunder from NIST, that the towers came down in only 8 and 11 seconds?


Like I said. You EVEN quoted it!


Sadly. twoofers never understand, that it is not the expert saying "dumb stuff"!
It's the Twoofers interpretation of things that is lacking, in intelligent understanding!


Sad, but damn funny!

Sometimes, it's hard to change your spots!

 
you know, enlgish isnt my first language. Maybe i missunderstood him.
so what exactyl did i missinterpret.

btw im not a truther anymore.

Your English has gotten a lot better overall though. :)
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom