Truthers are Troublemakers...

[adkinsjr]

Ok, Bill. I'm not opposed to a new investigation. I don't have to pay for it either way, as I'm not a US taxpayer, so go for it. In fact, it kind of bothers me that you haven't already begun, given how many legitimate scientists you claim to have in your ranks. Let's start by defining the investigation:

- Who should pay for it?
- Who should participate in it (i.e, who should the investigators be)?
- Under who's authority should it be conducted?
- Who should grant it subpoena power?
- How should it present it's results?
- If the investigation comes to the same conclusions as the last one, would you accept it? (I know you've already said you wouldn't, Bill, but this is for real twoofers.)

The only way a second investigation would convince the cult to accept reality would be if it involved a time machine. The cult will not accept any conclusion that doesn't involve intriguing government cover-ups, hidden elites of superhuman Jews, or the illuminati. It's no fun without spooky intrigue.

So the answer to your question is, no they would not accept it. Much like the lunatics on Ancient Aliens, 9/11 "truth" cult fanatics have a perverse desire to see history rewritten so that it conforms to their bizarre and laughably preposterous fantasies.

 

[dc1971]

The only way a second investigation would convince the cult to accept reality would be if it involved a time machine...

Even then, I'm sure Truthers would try to come up with something lame-brain about using a time machine such as it's either rigged or it's not a real time machine!

 

[Rolls]

Truthers are like online Locusts, especially to smaller websites that do not have the staff or resources to properly deal with them. Website "A" posts something that the truthers perceive as objectionable, and they swarm in like insects, flooding the site with their paranoid, and often profane rants, only to run away later having accomplished absolutely nothing. And they wonder why they are banned from so many different sites.

They cry "censorship" after being banned for stalking and leveling death threats. Many of them are beyond troublemakers. They are borderline criminals that upon the commision of a crime, should be punished to the fullest extent of the law. And those who only dabble, those "truthers" who have no real intention of actually breaking the law, should realize that if some incident they are not even directly involved in goes badly, like it or not, they can, and possibly will be judged by the company that they keep.

Rolls

 

[dc1971]

Truthers are like online Locusts, especially to smaller websites that do not have the staff or resources to properly deal with them. Website "A" posts something that the truthers perceive as objectionable, and they swarm in like insects, flooding the site with their paranoid, and often profane rants, only to run away later having accomplished absolutely nothing. And they wonder why they are banned from so many different sites.

They cry "censorship" after being banned for stalking and leveling death threats. Many of them are beyond troublemakers. They are borderline criminals that upon the commision of a crime, should be punished to the fullest extent of the law. And those who only dabble, those "truthers" who have no real intention of actually breaking the law, should realize that if some incident they are not even directly involved in goes badly, like it or not, they can, and possibly will be judged by the company that they keep.

Rolls

I agree! However, I will have to say that Truthers really have accomplished something and that is making themselves look like total fools!! And yes, I have received many death threats from these people and I don't take them lightly!! Since I used to subscribe to the Truther movement I have been branded as a traitor and according to them I should die!

Where will the lack of proper education take us next?

DC

 

[alienentity]

I
Where will the lack of proper education take us next?

DC

See next Presidential election...

 

[9/11-investigator]

Truthers are troublemakers, and hopefully one day, the shall be silenced.

Katyn style with a bullet through the skull Parky, just like in the good ol Soviet days when the world was in order, and Americans and Soviets, side by side bravely fought to 'liberate' Europe (and divide the continent between themselves)?

Be carefull with what you say, ol chap.

 

[9/11-investigator]

Well... tell me, why would they look for explosives?

Because hundred or so fire fighters reported explosions. That's a very good reason. Unless of course you want to assume that all these brave men were anti-semitic.

 

[dc1971]

Because hundred or so fire fighters reported explosions. That's a very good reason. Unless of course you want to assume that all these brave men were anti-semitic.

Not sure why you're making antisemitism an issue here?

 

[twinstead]

Not sure why you're making antisemitism an issue here?

He's a one-trick pony. If it ain't about the Jews, it isn't worth his time.

 

[dc1971]

Because hundred or so fire fighters reported explosions. That's a very good reason. Unless of course you want to assume that all these brave men were anti-semitic.

A hundred or so? Could you be off by 99? ...or so?

 

[LordoftheLeftHand]

Your post is Truther chum (meaning it will attract truthers who will take it as a personal assault).

That was pretty funny!

 

[JihadJane]

Oh noes - troublemakers! Eeek!

 

[9/11 Chewy Defense]

My opinion about Truthers is that they're very misguided individuals. It only takes 1 moron to stir the rest into a revolution of pure stupidity. I just think that Truthers suffer from post tramatic stress, paranoid schizophrenia, paranoid personality disorder & a whole host of mental problems.

 

[JihadJane]

My opinion about Truthers is that they're very misguided individuals. It only takes 1 moron to stir the rest into a revolution of pure stupidity. I just think that Truthers suffer from post tramatic stress, paranoid schizophrenia, paranoid personality disorder & a whole host of mental problems.

Shrink?

 

[dc1971]

My opinion about Truthers is that they're very misguided individuals. It only takes 1 moron to stir the rest into a revolution of pure stupidity. I just think that Truthers suffer from post tramatic stress, paranoid schizophrenia, paranoid personality disorder & a whole host of mental problems.

They also suffer from lack of education!

 

[9/11-investigator]

Not sure why you're making antisemitism an issue here?

Grüezi ... because of the villains who were behind the attacks:

http://how911wasdone.blogspot.com/

 

[9/11-investigator]

A hundred or so? Could you be off by 99? ...or so?

Here are 37 fire fighter testimonies to start with:

http://911review.com/coverup/oralhistories.html

I was too modest. There are 503 testimonies, including others than fire fighters:

For years, researchers of the 9/11 attack have built a case for the controlled demolition of the Twin Towers primarily on the basis of one body of evidence: the scores of photographs and videos of the Towers coming down. Whereas authorities were unable to prevent the circulation of this visual evidence, they successfully suppressed the largest body of eyewitness evidence for nearly four years. That body is a collection of hundreds of "oral histories" 503 firefighters, paramedics, and emergency medical technicians, many of whom witnessed some aspect of the total destruction of the Twin Towers.

 

[beachnut]

Because hundred or so fire fighters reported explosions. That's a very good reason. Unless of course you want to assume that all these brave men were anti-semitic.

Sounds, not explosives. You have evidnece of sound, not explosives. Boom, no CD on 911, just idiots in 911 truth who can't do physics, math, and more. What was your point about people reporting sounds? Do you have a point after 9 years of failing to figure out 911?

Do you mean like these?

"Sounded like explosions." –Anthony Fitzgerald
"Like a shotgun going off" –Mark Meier
"Sounded like explosions" –Wilfred Barriere
""Sounded like an explosion" –John Morabito
"There were lots of explosions" –Jeff Birnbaum
"Under the assumption that the sounds were secondary bombs." –Andrew Rodriguez
"Sounded like bombs. Like a bomb going off. I mean, it was huge." –FDNY Deputy Chief Peter Hayden
"Sounded like bombs, like blockbusters" –John Murray
"You could hear explosions" –Richard Smiouskas
"Sounded like an M-80, that's how loud they were" –Tim Pearson
"Sounds like a shotgun" –Eric Ronningen
"Sounded like bombs" –Keith Murphy
"A huge explosion" –Gerard Gorman
"Sound of popping and exploding" –Alwish Monchery
"Explosions" –William Burns
"Kept hearing these large boom, boom" –Rosario Terranova

... , you think these were explosives bringing down the WTC?

 

[dc1971]

Here are 37 fire fighter testimonies to start with:

http://911review.com/coverup/oralhistories.html

I was too modest. There are 503 testimonies, including others than fire fighters:

Yes? They witnessed some sort of destruction of the twin towers? 503 eyewitnesses did, and so did some 500 million+ people around the world by watching the event on television! So what?

 

[dc1971]

There were no explosives, and they know because no steel had blast effects and anyway, the morons at 911 truth are into thermite, and it was not fused to the steel. You guys only impact will be as fools who lack knowledge and skills to understand 911.

Yet they keep saying there were explosions, yet thermite was involved which kept things quiet, yet they keep saying there were explosions, yet thermite was involved which kept things quiet, yet they keep saying there were explosions, yet thermite was involved which kept things quiet, yet they keep saying there were explosions, yet thermite was involved which kept things quiet... you get it by now!