• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Trump's Second Term

Maybe the real shocking part is that people fall for this ◊◊◊◊

TRUMP SUPPORTER
@_Postive_Vibes
SHOCKING REVELATION: This woman, who has never voted in a presidential election except for Donald Trump in 2020, reviews her voting history and discovers that Democrats appear to have been voting in her name in the last three elections. "The United States needs election reforms."

video in link
Nowhere in the video does it actually say that whoever allegedly voted in her name voted for Democrats. And the image of the screen with the alleged data is too blurry to be able to read it in the video.

A number of possibilities:
  • The "data" has been faked.
  • She's knowingly lying.
  • She's affiliated with the group presenting this
  • She did vote but doesn't remember.
  • She's an outright idiot who can be coerced.
  • Several or all of the above.
 
I thought that at first, but the claim was that she had never voted until Trump. I still haven't any idea if someone can see *whether* they voted.
In many states, it is possible to determine whether your ballot was counted.

However the claim that it was Democrats who voted in her name. Surely the record would be that she voted in her name?
If her ballot was counted, then her state believed she was the one who submitted that ballot. If she truly knows she did not vote, but her state believes she did, then the most likely explanations are (1) someone she knows stole her mail-in ballot and submitted it in her name or (2) someone impersonated her when voting in person. Even if either of those things is what really happened, the only way she could know the fraudulent votes were cast by Democrats is by knowing who committed the voter fraud, which raises the question of why she is bleating about it on X instead of reporting the fraud to her state's legal authorities.

There are several other problems with her claim. She says, for example, that she voted for Trump in 2020, that she has never voted in any presidential election other than 2020, but that "Democrats appear to have been voting in her name in the last three elections." That's MAGA math: The last three presidential elections include the 2020 election, in which she says she voted, and her state would have rejected any second ballot submitted in her name for that 2020 election. She can't be talking about the last three national elections either, because there have been only two of them since 2020: the 2022 and 2024 elections.

No, the most likely explanations are (simplifying @shemp's list):
  • She is lying.
  • She is confused.
  • She has fallen for a lie that someone has told her.
A combination of two or more of those explanations is far more likely to be true than was her claim.
 
Last edited:
Nowhere in the video does it actually say that whoever allegedly voted in her name voted for Democrats. And the image of the screen with the alleged data is too blurry to be able to read it in the video.

A number of possibilities:
  • The "data" has been faked.
  • She's knowingly lying.
  • She's affiliated with the group presenting this
  • She did vote but doesn't remember.
  • She's an outright idiot who can be coerced.
  • Several or all of the above.
All are far more likely than the claim she's making. It's even possible she voted for Democrats, but has gone so deep into the Trump cult that she's lying about ever having done so.

My wife was a poll worker in the '20 and '24 elections. She was posted to a small, rural community here in Greenville County, South Carolina. In the '24 election in particular, she was shocked by the number of older people who said they were voting for the first time in their lives. Many were so ignorant of the electoral system that they didn't understand why there were names other than Harris and Trump on the ballot. She was alarmed by how many appeared to be functionally illiterate, needing help to follow the simple instructions to use the ballot, and getting frustrated that there was only so much help the poll workers were allowed to give. She overhead enough to be convinced that a lot of them were there because they'd bought into the ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ about the '20 election being stolen.
 
In many states, it is possible to determine whether your ballot was counted.


If her ballot was counted, then her state believed she was the one who submitted that ballot. If she truly knows she did not vote, but her state believes she did, then the most likely explanations are (1) someone she knows stole her mail-in ballot and submitted it in her name or (2) someone impersonated her when voting in person. Even if either of those things is what really happened, the only way she could know the fraudulent votes were cast by Democrats is by knowing who committed the voter fraud, which raises the question of why she is bleating about it on X instead of reporting the fraud to her state's legal authorities.

There are several other problems with her claim. She says, for example, that she voted for Trump in 2020, that she has never voted in any presidential election other than 2020, but that "Democrats appear to have been voting in her name in the last three elections." That's MAGA math: The last three presidential elections include the 2020 election, in which she says she voted, and her state would have rejected any second ballot submitted in her name for that 2020 election. She can't be talking about the last three national elections either, because there have been only two of them since 2020: the 2022 and 2024 elections.

No, the most likely explanations are (simplifying @shemp's list):
  • She is lying.
  • She is confused.
  • She has fallen for a lie that someone has told her.
A combination of two or more of those explanations is far more likely to be true than was her claim.
She's still a ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ idiot. And not just because she admits to voting for Schitler. She admits to never having voted except once. This is a sign of an idiot who doesn't give a damn about this country. I've voted in every presidential election and every "off-year" election from 1976 forward. She is a ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ idiot. Some or all of the other points are also true.
 
All are far more likely than the claim she's making. It's even possible she voted for Democrats, but has gone so deep into the Trump cult that she's lying about ever having done so.

My wife was a poll worker in the '20 and '24 elections. She was posted to a small, rural community here in Greenville County, South Carolina. In the '24 election in particular, she was shocked by the number of older people who said they were voting for the first time in their lives. Many were so ignorant of the electoral system that they didn't understand why there were names other than Harris and Trump on the ballot. She was alarmed by how many appeared to be functionally illiterate, needing help to follow the simple instructions to use the ballot, and getting frustrated that there was only so much help the poll workers were allowed to give. She overhead enough to be convinced that a lot of them were there because they'd bought into the ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ about the '20 election being stolen.
Sadly, some of these people probably have voted before but don't remember due to dementia.
 
A billion dollars

1779637922174.jpeg

HASSETT: The president is using his own money and the money of donors to make it so taxpayers don't have to pay for the ballroom

CORDES: Well, taxpayer would have to pay a billion dollars, correct?

HASSETT: No. That's not for the ballroom, that's for securing the entire White House

video in link
 
Nowhere in the video does it actually say that whoever allegedly voted in her name voted for Democrats. And the image of the screen with the alleged data is too blurry to be able to read it in the video.

A number of possibilities:
  • The "data" has been faked.
  • She's knowingly lying.
  • She's affiliated with the group presenting this
  • She did vote but doesn't remember.
  • She's an outright idiot who can be coerced.
  • Several or all of the above.
It's all an act.


ETA: Sorry about the bad language.
 
Last edited:
Trump posts a meme of his political foes in prison jumpsuits, including "Barack Hussein Obama"

1779640760262.jpeg
 
A billion dollars

View attachment 71539

HASSETT: The president is using his own money and the money of donors to make it so taxpayers don't have to pay for the ballroom

CORDES: Well, taxpayer would have to pay a billion dollars, correct?

HASSETT: No. That's not for the ballroom, that's for securing the entire White House

video in link
Well, if you rip down the rest of the White House, that's technically securing it, i suppose...
 
She's still a ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ idiot. And not just because she admits to voting for Schitler. She admits to never having voted except once. This is a sign of an idiot who doesn't give a damn about this country. I've voted in every presidential election and every "off-year" election from 1976 forward. She is a ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ idiot. Some or all of the other points are also true.
💯 This.

Even our local parish council election (they look after the local park and a few other things like that) had a 32% turnout, which I thought was pretty high for such a minor post.

Both candidates were independents although the winner does have a history of being a Tory.
 
Ballroom!!

Donald J. Trump
@realDonald Trump
Thank you to our great Secret Service and Law Enforcement for the swift and professional action taken this evening against a gunman near the White House, who had a violent history and possible obsession with our Country's most cherished structure. The gunman is dead after an exchange of gunfire with Secret Service Agents near the White House gates. This event is one month removed from the White House Correspondent'Dinner shooting, and goes to show how important it is, for all future Presidents, to get, what will be, the most safe and secure space of its kind ever built in Washington, D.C. The National Security of our Country demands it!
Surely the facts that neither attack came anywhere near succeeding, and that the measures already in place in the absence of his billion-dollar boondoggle were sufficient to prevent their success, show that the thing isn't as necessary or important as he's trying to claim? I mean, no "safe and secure space" is going to prevent crazy people from trying to do crazy things unless you always stay away from them inside it- is that his intent, to build a, let's call it a "bunker," to insulate (and isolate) himself completely from the people who are paying for it?
 
Last edited:
"a nation of men of Lee's calibre would be unconquerable in spirit and soul."

Lee sold out his nation to join its enemy. *That* nation was conquered within four years. So I'm not sure where Eisenhower's getting this.
Miller wrote it. Posted it on Ike's Truth Social account.
 
Last edited:
I thought that at first, but the claim was that she had never voted until Trump. I still haven't any idea if someone can see *whether* they voted.

However the claim that it was Democrats who voted in her name. Surely the record would be that she voted in her name?
Indeed. It is, one supposes, possible to vote in the place of someone you know is registered but not intending to vote, but in order to get away with it you'd have to pretend to be that person, and that would include the party affiliation if that's included in the registration at all (it is in Connecticut, is not in Vermont).
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom