Helen
Implicitly explicit
It was the smile, wasn't it? War is a serious business, after all. Yeah, I'm sure it was the smile.Hmmm, I think I see why.
It was the smile, wasn't it? War is a serious business, after all. Yeah, I'm sure it was the smile.Hmmm, I think I see why.
Probably an Expendables movie.What is the old fool gibbering about this time?
The Utah population is shifting blue faster than practically any other such state. Republicans have had a supermajority in the legislature for decades, and are now scared.Stop Radical Leftist Judges, and KEEP UTAH RED.
Proposition 4 was a bipartisan voter initiative that blunts the partisan gerrymander. Utah is one of the most radically gerrymandered states in the country. It required electoral maps to be drawn by a bipartisan commission. It passed with about 55% of the vote, meaning that a substantial number of Republican voters switched sides to vote for it. Registered republicans are about 51% of the state, yet our entire congressional delegation is guaranteed by the gerrymandering to be Republican.A very important effort is underway in Utah to repeal Proposition 4, make Map Drawing accountable to Utah Voters
Bwahahaha!stop Radical Leftist Judges
It would take another whole post for me to describe all the laws Republican lawmakers are ignoring in order to gather these signatures. The signatures are being gathered by paid out-of-state operatives (illegal). The gatherers are supposed to carry an exact copy of the proposed ballot measure, but they have conveniently "forgotten" them (illegal). In Utah County (the conservative county one valley south from the capital), the county clerk has received a record 500 complaints about unlawful signature gathering. I myself have challenged these signature-gatherers when I see them.But this can only happen if enough Citizens of Utah sign the Petition to put the Prop 4 Repeal on the Ballot for the November 3, 2026 Election.
Utahns are frantically struggling to make their voices heard. The state legislature is terrified of losing its supermajority. The Republican Party is terrified of losing its monopoly on representation in Congress. Utah is simply not as ultraconservative as it used to be, and we want our elected leaders to represent who we really are.Utahns deserve Maps drawn by those they elect, not Rogue Judges or Leftwing Activists who never faced the Voters
That's today, and last I checked they were 80,000 signatures short of getting their measure on the ballot.You must sign by February 15th!
Thanks for the additional contextThe Utah population is shifting blue faster than practically any other such state. Republicans have had a supermajority in the legislature for decades, and are now scared.
Proposition 4 was a bipartisan voter initiative that blunts the partisan gerrymander. Utah is one of the most radically gerrymandered states in the country. It required electoral maps to be drawn by a bipartisan commission. It passed with about 55% of the vote, meaning that a substantial number of Republican voters switched sides to vote for it. Registered republicans are about 51% of the state, yet our entire congressional delegation is guaranteed by the gerrymandering to be Republican.
Republican lawmakers tried to overturn it in court and lost, because the Utah Constitution does not allow the legislature to override a voter initiative when that initiative intends to reform government itself. Republican lawmakers then called themselves back into session to propose a constitutional amendment removing the restriction. That requires ratification by the voters. Republican lawmakers misstated the purpose of the amendment in the ballot language and got caught. Republican legislative leadership had previously repealed a law that required ballot language to be written by the legislature's office of legal counsel, and gave that power to the president of the Utah senate and the speaker of the Utah house.
Bwahahaha!
Judges in Utah are appointed by our Republican governor and confirmed by our Republican-supermajority legislature. They're about as "radical left" as Clarence Thomas. Plus, they were unanimous in disallowing the dishonest amendment proposal.
Sadly our legislature is in session now and has passed two laws that will radically reshape the Utah judiciary. They packed the supreme court, increasing the number of justices from five to seven. This lets them immediately put two more ultraconservative judges on the bench and give themselves a 4-3 majority in the state Supreme Court. And they just created a new court out of thin air to hear "constitutional" issues. Again, this lets them appoint new judges specifically to hear their power-grab cases.
It would take another whole post for me to describe all the laws Republican lawmakers are ignoring in order to gather these signatures. The signatures are being gathered by paid out-of-state operatives (illegal). The gatherers are supposed to carry an exact copy of the proposed ballot measure, but they have conveniently "forgotten" them (illegal). In Utah County (the conservative county one valley south from the capital), the county clerk has received a record 500 complaints about unlawful signature gathering. I myself have challenged these signature-gatherers when I see them.
Utahns are frantically struggling to make their voices heard. The state legislature is terrified of losing its supermajority. The Republican Party is terrified of losing its monopoly on representation in Congress. Utah is simply not as ultraconservative as it used to be, and we want our elected leaders to represent who we really are.
That's today, and last I checked they were 80,000 signatures short of getting their measure on the ballot.
Chris Christie: "This false idea grand juries will indict a ham sandwich -- it's not true and the Trump administration is proving that. They're putting a bunch of ham sandwiches up there and the grand juries are not indicting them."
I checked the counts just now. As of this morning they're about 50,000 signatures short. They've collected about 84,000 signatures. They have until 5 pm to finish collecting signatures. The current signature count does not include packets turned in to clerk offices but not yet verified, and we won't know for sure until the signatures are certified on Feb. 23. The paid signature gatherers have been fired, and the irregularities reported to clerk offices are typically resolved (if proven) by invalidating the gathered signatures.I posted it to get Jay's take on the matter.
I'm going to have to say that Chris sounds like he's wrong to me. A ham sandwich is rather neutral. Getting a Grand Jury to be willing to figuratively sentence the ham sandwich to be eaten by the jury is sorta plausible and honestly not overtly bad, even if it's likely not going to pan out in the end. The Trump Administration might be better described trying to shove a rotten, bug infested sandwiches down the jury's throats. The conceptual difference is important, really. Indicting a ham sandwich is a joke that played on the nature of how things work. What the Trump Administration is doing is more aptly described as trying to simply break how things work and make everything whimsically arbitrary in their favor, because so much of what they do and want to do is overtly illegal, immoral, and injust.Chris Christie: "This false idea grand juries will indict a ham sandwich -- it's not true and the Trump administration is proving that. They're putting a bunch of ham sandwiches up there and the grand juries are not indicting them."
The non-Trump republicans I listen to on occasion summed it up as:Of course, in the MSN and Fox Entertainment forums, the hardcore maga weirdoes are still calling the "Polls showing Americans Sour On Admin's Immigration Tactics" fake news.
I'll bet most of them watch horror movies and think, "Yeah, I'd do that," when the people get slaughtered.
Morons.
ETA: As much as I'm not a big fan of Christie, I'll give him points for sometimes saying the right thing.
The non-Trump republicans I listen to on occasion summed it up as:
Americans by and large like good security at the border. They really DONT like seeing masked armed men going around asking to see people's proof of citizen within the border.
I'm going to have to say that Chris sounds like he's wrong to me. A ham sandwich is rather neutral. Getting a Grand Jury to be willing to figuratively sentence the ham sandwich to be eaten by the jury is sorta plausible and honestly not overtly bad, even if it's likely not going to pan out in the end. The Trump Administration might be better described trying to shove a rotten, bug infested sandwiches down the jury's throats. The conceptual difference is important, really. Indicting a ham sandwich is a joke that played on the nature of how things work. What the Trump Administration is doing is more aptly described as trying to simply break how things work and make everything whimsically arbitrary in their favor, because so much of what they do and want to do is overtly illegal, immoral, and injust.
It is, btw, an old saying. Not something Christie just came up with.Yup, but a "ham sandwich" sounds funnier.
It is, btw, an old saying. Not something Christie just came up with.
Also, Scooby Doo!Also let's remember, even if they get parts of Ukraine (which they probably at this point will), that just sets them up for what Beau of the Fifth Column always called 'the hard part'. I predict partisans with plenty combat experience and Western weaponry and equipment. Then again, I also see them working to forcibly remove residents and replace them with russians.
The DOGE teenagers will have to brave a series of traps, solve a riddle*, and find a note saying 'lol I hid all the gold in a secret place you'll never find it --Obama' The gold will reappear once the Democrats take office again.
*They'll pull through. We know from Harry Potter that teenagers are adept at this.
They cheer for Dracula.Of course, in the MSN and Fox Entertainment forums, the hardcore maga weirdoes are still calling the "Polls showing Americans Sour On Admin's Immigration Tactics" fake news.
I'll bet most of them watch horror movies and think, "Yeah, I'd do that," when the people get slaughtered.
Morons.
So, you're a libtardcommiesocialist! I'm getting drunk on your tears, comrade!The process in my current state was to get a driver's license. That was it. The DL database is used by the voter registration people. They went through the records about a year ago. The people that are green card (yes, they can drive) did not vote in 2024. There was not one listed as noncitizen that voted. It's only a million voters or so to go through.
I talked to the guy once as he gave a talk to seniors. He registers all the people in the state. In a county there were three people from one address sending in mail votes. That county has ONLY mail voting. The signatures looked like one person. Two signatures did not match signature on record. It was an aunt that voted for her niece and nephew and signed all three. The two were infomed that their vote did not count unless they send in a new ballot with real signatures. They did not. Only the aunt, the fraudster, got to vote that time.