it is not in evidence from posters on this board.One would think.It must be wearing thin even for them.
Aggregates are not so bad: https://www.natesilver.net/p/trump-approval-ratings-nate-silver-bulletinTrump has lost 15 points with independents since February
Donald J. Trump
@realDonald Trump
So many Fake Polls are being shown by the Radical Left Media, all slanted heavily toward Democrats and Far Left Wingers. In the Fair Polls, and even the Reasonable Polls, I have the Best Numbers I have ever had and, why shouldn't I? I ended eight Wars, created the Greatest Economy in the History of our Country, kept Prices, Inflation, and Taxes down, and am setting standards for Right Track / Wrong Track for a future U.S.A. Fake News will never change, they are evil and corrupt but, as I look around my beautiful surroundings, I say to myself, "Oh, look, I'm sitting in the Oval Office!"
The White House
@WhiteHouse
“…Fake News will never change, they are evil and corrupt but, as I look around my beautiful surroundings, I say to myself, ‘Oh, look, I’m sitting in the Oval Office!’” - President Donald J. Trump
I know, right? Like how about this guy who posted just before your comment:Why do you even bother posting such witless statements?
Aw, the poor, widdle Communists won't be able to feather their Swiss bank accounts!
President Donald “Obeys Every Law” Trump appreciates your like-minded scholarship!Yes, border and visa violations literally and legally *are* crimes! They are violations of criminal laws! Improper Entry is a violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1325 and is a misdemeanor on the first offense. Illegal Re-Entry is a violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 and is a felony based on prior deportation/removal. Marriage/Visa Fraud violates 8 U.S.C. § 1325(c), a felony. Remaining in the U.S. after a valid visa has expired (visa overstay), or violating the terms of a visa (e.g., working on a tourist visa) or engaging in activities outside the scope of the visa (e.g., studying on a non-student visa) are civil violations, but sneaking into the US (or just about any other country, under their laws) is a violation of criminal laws.
Stupid pathetic turds.Grandpa and Grandma deputize themselves for ICE and demand to see "ze papers."
![]()
Barbara Sobel (@barbaraj.sobel) on Threads
MAGA grandma & grandpa threaten to "call ICE" on men at post office—demand to see their papers. "They're probably illegal, I should call ICE," says woman. "Let me have your driver's license!" man demands. "What's your name?" The incident occurred outside the U.S. Post Office located on Adams...www.threads.com
Ha!Hmm. He clearly has no idea what that's about. So who did wield the Autosharpie?
Ask him another tricky one - "What did you have for lunch yesterday?"
Speak for yourself. My Swiss bank account needs a top up.I know, right? Like how about this guy who posted just before your comment.
Whether he or anyone else obeys any or no law, the fact is that breaking any law is illegal and could be prosecuted. Crossing into the US illegally is a violation of the law and prosecutable. Your whataboutism is irrelevant, especially as Trump has not been excused from possible prosecution.President Donald “Obeys Every Law” Trump appreciates your like-minded scholarship!
.
You seem to like laws. You know who else liked laws?Whether he or anyone else obeys any or no law, the fact is that breaking any law is illegal and could be prosecuted. Crossing into the US illegally is a violation of the law and prosecutable. Your whataboutism is irrelevant, especially as Trump has not been excused from possible prosecution.
There were two legal systems which operated alongside each other in Nazi Germany. These were defined by Ernst Fraenkel, a lawyer and political scientist in his 1941 book The Dual State as the 'Normative State' (a normal legal system similar to others in Western Europe) and the 'Prerogative State' (a parallel legal system in which orders from Hitler and others acting in his name were deemed legal). Under this system (the prerogative state) the mass killings ordered by Hitler were legal under Nazi law and it was only after the War that the Allies declared them to be Crimes Against Humanity at Nuremberg (see below). It was only in 1965 at the 1965 Auschwitz Frankfurt trial that a German court ruled that the SS committed murder at Auschwitz.
In Nazi Germany, the civil service provided a legal framework to deprive Jews of their rights. Opportunities to create anti-Jewish policies were coveted and career bureaucrats came together and developed increasingly radical policies. Their familiarity with the legal system enabled them to easily manipulate it. The judiciary lost its independence as it was increasingly controlled by the Nazis. Judges who did not join the National Socialist League for the Maintenance of Law were dismissed. Jewish lawyers and judges and those with socialist or other views inconvenient to the Nazi Party were removed. The fundamental legal principle became Nazi "common sense", "Whatever is good for Germany is legal". The People's Court (Volksgerichtshof) was created in 1934 for people accused of political crimes. In 1938, all crimes began to be tried in the court; in 1939, its remit was expanded to include minor offenses. Roland Freisler, appointed in 1942 as judge and interrogator, was infamous for "berating and belittling" defendants and lawyers. Statutes were "systematically misinterpreted", and the court has been described as committing "judicial murders". Separation of defendants and lawyers was calculated to prevent communication, and defense presentations were often interrupted. Courts were made up of three judges; all verdicts were final, and the convicted defendant was immediately executed. The 20 July plot in 1944 was accompanied by a series of aggressive prosecutions, and over 110 death sentences were imposed in fifty trials.
Possibly. I don't follow Trump's legal issues in great detail, just reading now and then as I run across them. I did ask Gemini for clarification on this one before I posted, though.@Opcode is confused.
Donald Trump's criminal case, in which he was convicted of 34 felony counts of falsifying business records, had nothing to do with property values.
Thanks for the clarification.@Opcode appears to think Trump's criminal convictions had something to do with the civil case ... But this was a civil case.
"In New York, falsifying business records is normally a misdemeanor. To elevate it to a felony (First Degree), prosecutors had to prove that the records were falsified with the intent to commit, conceal, or aid the commission of another crime." The other crime of which Trump is accused is concealing damaging information and unlawfully influencing the 2016 presidential election. However, we don't have evidence that Trump actually did that. He never was tried on this other, alleged crime.In the criminal case, which was an entirely separate proceeding, Donald Trump was found guilty of 34 felony counts of falsifying business records to conceal his hush money payments to Stormy Daniels. That criminal case was not only the first case in which a (former) US president was convicted of a felony; it was also the first time a (former) US president was held in criminal contempt of court.
Under appeal, I read.That is why President Donald J Trump has a criminal record: He was convicted of 34 felonies.
J6 didn't result in a billion dollars in damages and dozens dead. It did involve unarmed citizens walking through a public building.Like the J6 rioters, er protestors?
J6 didn't result in a billion dollars in damages and dozens dead. It did involve unarmed citizens walking through a public building.