The big question I have in all of these types of rulings is... How are the Trump bootlickers on the court going to reverse themselves if/when a Democrat becomes president again.
If a Democrat becomes President again, the Ridiculous Six will just ignore any precedents that they have set. I mean, just take a look at
Biden vs Nebraska compared to
McMahon vs New York. In Nebraska, the SCOTUS said that Biden could not cancel student loans, even though the plain text of existing law said he could. In McMahon, SCOTUS allowed Trump to fire over a thousand Department of Education employees, even though the law said he could not. How did they justify the difference? They didn't justify it at all, it was put on the Shadow docket and Trump was given the win with no actual reasoning provided.
Conservatives have a 6-3 edge on our unelected Super Legislature. They used to at least try to provide pseudo-legal reasoning for their partisan decisions, but if they can get a case on the Shadow Docket, they don't have to do even that.