• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Trump's Second Term

Article I, Section 9, Clause 8:
No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.
 
Andy_Ross said:
Article I, Section 9, Clause 8:
No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.
Click to expand...
Good luck getting the MAGA-controlled Congress to enforce this.
 
Hercules56 said:
Prosecuting them for what actions?
Click to expand...
The allegation is that Democrat lawmakers unlawfully entered an ICE facility, the incident in which the mayor of Newark, N.J. was arrested. Members of Congress have an unconditional right to enter any federal detention facility without warning or hindrance. The Republicans maintain a series of lies that the congressional delegation "stormed" the facility, that they "body slammed" an ICE officer, and that they "holed up" in a guard shack after entry. Literally none of that is true, and there is plenty of video of the incident.

The mayor is a different story, as he had no right to enter. He entered, was stopped by ICE officers, and told to leave. He did so peacefully, but was arrested anyway.
 
JayUtah said:
The allegation is that Democrat lawmakers unlawfully entered an ICE facility, the incident in which the mayor of Newark, N.J. was arrested. Members of Congress have an unconditional right to enter any federal detention facility without warning or hindrance. The Republicans maintain a series of lies that the congressional delegation "stormed" the facility, that they "body slammed" an ICE officer, and that they "holed up" in a guard shack after entry. Literally none of that is true, and there is plenty of video of the incident.

The mayor is a different story, as he had no right to enter. He entered, was stopped by ICE officers, and told to leave. He did so peacefully, but was arrested anyway.
Click to expand...
If he did so peacefully he would not have been arrested. Is there any bodycam footage?

Police memory can be used as evidence for probable cause.

Conduct: Safety, security, and good order are always primary considerations in a detention facility, and visitors must be properly identified and attired. All visitors are subject to search upon entering the facility and at any other time during the tour/visit.

All visitors must present a valid, verifiable government-issued identification card to enter an ICE detention facility. To preclude potential delays, Members should be prepared to show valid identification identifying him/her as a Member of Congress. Congressional staff should be prepared to show valid congressional identification issued by either the House or Senate Sergeant at Arms Identification Office. Identification will be checked prior to entering the facility. If the facility is unable to validate the identity of a visitor (e.g., the individual is not in possession of valid congressional identification), that individual will not be allowed to enter the facility.

Recording Devices: For the safety, security, and order of the facility, and to protect the privacy rights of those in custody (to include the right to not be photographed or recorded without consent), as well as visitors and the employees, contractors, and volunteers who work in these facilities, no electronic recording devices or picture taking is permitted inside ICE detention facilities. Before attempting to enter any ICE detention facility, all visitors should leave cell phones and other electronics in their vehicle.

 
Last edited:
Hmm, it appears the Mayor was inside the gates illegally without authorization but left peacefully.


Did he still commit a crime? Its possible.
 
Norman Alexander said:
Sorry, just had to. ;)

a118a588-f4e0-44d6-a2d6-fcd1ce13cc1c.jpg
Click to expand...
Obviously fake. Only three stars. Trump will is a six-star general/admiral!!
 
JayUtah said:
The allegation is that Democrat lawmakers unlawfully entered an ICE facility, the incident in which the mayor of Newark, N.J. was arrested. Members of Congress have an unconditional right to enter any federal detention facility without warning or hindrance. The Republicans maintain a series of lies that the congressional delegation "stormed" the facility, that they "body slammed" an ICE officer, and that they "holed up" in a guard shack after entry. Literally none of that is true, and there is plenty of video of the incident.

The mayor is a different story, as he had no right to enter. He entered, was stopped by ICE officers, and told to leave. He did so peacefully, but was arrested anyway.
Click to expand...
my understanding is that this was not a federal facility. It was a private facility. It had to be approved first by the city, and it may be that city authorities have a right to inspect. Once approved as a detention facility they could then contract to house detainees under contract to ICE. The contract with Ice may include a right for inspection by members of the house and staff.
 
Trebuchet said:
Obviously fake. Only three stars. Trump will is a six-star general/admiral!!
Click to expand...
Stars are little suns -- did you know that? Nobody knows that. I know that, and I told NASA, the space...I told them, "suns are big stars". So that's why the navy put suns instead of stars on my jacket. Because I'm, it's, I'm. The best, they all said. Suns! Big as suns! Big, beautiful suns, giving all that light. Beautiful light! Biden didn't do anything for the sun, but I can. Sun is good. Except for cancer, it causes cancer. It doesn't, I don't know, maybe. Some people think so but I don't know, that's just beautiful. I don't have cancer, healthiest president ever, not like dementia Obama. I mean Biden. They both, they both are. Lamp. Tomato. Is where a dog when? Fample.
 
So, rule of, what makes you think that anyone in a position of authority in this administration will actually do anything to make the new Qatari Trump One compliant with anything regarding security etc? Trump will just declare it and its golden toilets safe and secure. Do you really think Hegseth's going to overrule him?
At least the lateral control system will be safe, it wasn't going to be airworthy before I got called back in to help.
 
Herr Schitler hits all 8 of these. Also applies to his cult.

www.yourtango.com

8 Subtle Traits Of People Who Have A Low IQ

People are intelligent in their own ways, but someone who exhibits these subtle traits has a low IQ.
www.yourtango.com www.yourtango.com

Here are 8 subtle traits of people who have a low IQ​

1. They're not very curious​

2. They struggle to adapt to new situations​

3. They don't know what they don't know​

4. They see the world in black and white​

5. They don't change their minds often​

6. They have a hard time thinking in hypothetical terms​

7. They lack empathy​

8. They're self-centered​

Click to expand...
 
Hercules56 said:
Did he still commit a crime? Its possible.
Click to expand...
He was charged with misdemeanor trespassing under New Jersey state law. Under 18 U.S.C. § 13, violations of state law committed upon federal property can be charged in federal court. The federal trespassing statute has a more stringent requirement for intent, and so was not charged here. Since the charge was brought by acting U.S. Attorney Alina Habba—probably one of the least competent attorneys I can name—that should tell you how much water the charges are likely to hold.

Planigale said:
my understanding is that this was not a federal facility. It was a private facility. It had to be approved first by the city, and it may be that city authorities have a right to inspect. Once approved as a detention facility they could then contract to house detainees under contract to ICE. The contract with Ice may include a right for inspection by members of the house and staff.
Click to expand...
Possibly. The City of Newark has sued the private operator claiming it completed its renovation of the Delaney Hall facility without proper permits and certificates. The company claims in response that it does have proper certification and has started housing detainees there in defiance of the suit. I'm not sure what rights city officials have to enter and inspect while the suit is pending.

Delaney Hall is owned by a private company. As such it is not federal property for land-ownership purposes. However, private parties that carry out federal functions under contract fall under some laws governing the activity of the agencies themselves, depending on how the law is worded. There doesn't seem to be any question that the owners of Delaney Hall have a contract with ICE to operate as a detention facility. In that respect, the access policy in statute is enforceable against the private contractor as it would be against the agency itself. The interesting point of law is whether the City of Newark's dispute includes ICE by virtue of the contract, or whether it is solely with the private owner.
 
More evil stupidity from the dog-killer.

www.nbcnews.com

Noem's claim that Afghan refugees can safely return to their homeland is 'just absurd,' advocates say

Lawmakers, including some Republicans, said the administration was jeopardizing the lives of those who had stood by the United States.
www.nbcnews.com www.nbcnews.com

Noem's claim that Afghan refugees can safely return to their Taliban-ruled homeland is 'just absurd,' advocates say​

Lawmakers, including some Republicans, said the administration was jeopardizing the lives of those who had stood by the United States.

The Trump administration says Afghan refugees can safely return to Afghanistan despite warnings from rights groups and lawmakers that Afghans who worked for the U.S. military face the threat of persecution, imprisonment and even execution by the Taliban regime.

The Department of Homeland Security announced on Monday it had stripped legal protections for thousands of Afghans in the U.S., saying that the security and economic situation in Afghanistan no longer justified granting them temporary protected status, or TPS.

“We’ve reviewed the conditions in Afghanistan with our interagency partners, and they do not meet the requirements for a TPS designation,” Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said in a statement.

“Afghanistan has had an improved security situation, and its stabilizing economy no longer” prevents Afghans from returning to their home country, she said.
Click to expand...

What the ever-living ◊◊◊◊ is wrong with her??? And all the other ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ who think this is just fine???
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom