Trump's Second Term

"the long time abused USA is bringing in Billions of Dollars a week from the abusing countries on Tariffs that are already in place."

He continues to just not understand how tariffs work, or his dementia has gotten bad enough that he forgets every time someone explains it to him.
Other countries don't pay the tariffs you moron!!
He doesn't care. It sounds good to the knuckle-dragging apes who voted for him.
 
"the long time abused USA is bringing in Billions of Dollars a week from the abusing countries on Tariffs that are already in place."

He continues to just not understand how tariffs work, or his dementia has gotten bad enough that he forgets every time someone explains it to him.
Other countries don't pay the tariffs you moron!!
Remember he's had 40 years dwelling on how great an idea they are.
 
Last edited:
FIRE might claim to be non-partisan, but those claims should be taken with a healthy dose of skepticism, given roots, associations, activities, and funding. That's not to say that one should necessarily agree or disagree with whatever position they happen to be arguing for in whatever case, of course, but that's a different matter that should be a matter of course.
FIRE also receives support from the National Philanthropic Trust, Jack Dorsey's StartSmall and the Hugh Hefner foundation, organizations that lean left of center. This spectrum of support is exactly what I would expect: principled conservatives and principled liberals both care about freedom of expression.

Source Watch was rated as mostly factual but also strongly left biased by Mediabiasfactcheck. If anything, I would take their words with a dollop or two of skepticism.
 
FIRE also receives support from the National Philanthropic Trust, Jack Dorsey's StartSmall and the Hugh Hefner foundation, organizations that lean left of center. This spectrum of support is exactly what I would expect: principled conservatives and principled liberals both care about freedom of expression.

Source Watch was rated as mostly factual but also strongly left biased by Mediabiasfactcheck. If anything, I would take their words with a dollop or two of skepticism.
First, I think that it should be noted that the mostly factual rating isn't due to accuracy, but rather -
Is SourceWatch credible? Yes, but they are one-sided in their reports, and this bias must be considered.
It's fair to recommend that skepticism be applied, certainly, but that does not negate the points actually made by them or suggest that they're actually inaccurate.

Second, I think that it should be noted that, as I said in what you quoted, whether to agree or disagree with any particular argument made should not be dependent on views of how they lean. I am in alignment with them when it comes to what you posted of what they said regarding Harvard's situation, either way. I'm pretty sure that I've cited FIRE on occasion, as well, for what that's worth. That doesn't negate either my first point or the next one, though.

Third, it is entirely reasonable to harbor distrust for groups that employ deceitful measures to achieve harmful ends, even if those means and ends are being justified by being profitable for a few. Those that are created by, support, and are supported by those groups are also entirely reasonable to distrust, as is the case with FIRE, even when also supported by others and have ostensibly noble goals. When there's good reason to believe that the groups that created them, support them, and are supported by them have values that are not in alignment with the ostensibly noble goals being espoused, there's even more cause for distrust, as is again the case with FIRE. Once more, this does not negate the second point made, but it does make Donal's distrust entirely understandable.
 
Last edited:

Umm, bull ◊◊◊◊.
 
WTF is this trumpist facination with Russia?

President Donald Trump’s nominee to be the U.S. Attorney for Washington, DC did not disclose his 100-plus appearances on Russian state TV on a Senate questionnaire ahead of his confirmation hearing, reported The Washington Post on Wednesday.

The bombshell story by Spencer S. Hsu and Aaron Schaffer revealed Ed Martin’s over 150 different appearances on RT and Sputnik – propaganda arms of the Russian government. The report noted that Martin, who is currently the interim U.S. attorney for D.C., appeared on the networks “as a guest commentator from August 2016 to April 2024, according to a search of their websites and the Internet Archive’s database of television broadcasts.” Additionally, the Post scooped the fact that “Martin did not disclose the appearances last month on a Senate Judiciary Committee questionnaire, which asks nominees to list all media interviews. Analysis of television archives suggests he went on RT and Sputnik more often than on any major cable network during that span.”
 
Reason's Jacob Sullum stated, "DOGE is still listing a $1.9 billion IRS tech support contract with Centennial Technologies that was terminated during the Biden administration. After the Times noted that mistake, the contract disappeared from DOGE's list, but now it is back. It is the second-largest item on DOGE's "Wall of Receipts." The third-largest item "comes from a canceled grant to a vaccine nonprofit," the Times notes. Although "Musk's group says that saved $1.75 billion," the organization "said it had actually been paid in full, so the savings was $0."" Well, that is...disappointing.
 
Will Trump be able to groom a follower for 2028? Important goals will take years more.

They still have a mission in 2028, finish the job:
1 remove every foreigner who has not had at least a green card 10 years.
2 remove every trans woman athlete from every team. Even frisbee golf.

Other stuff like Social Security will be gone by 2028.
 

Back
Top Bottom