Oh good grief...
Numerous high resolution models use radar data. And the reason buildings don't show up is because the clutter supression accounts for them. Clutter suppression can account for wind farms too but the problem is that they cover thousands of acres, so if you suppress that area you run the risk of missing actual precipitation! You are arguing with the wrong person, I literally was a "forecaster adjusting for mountain peaks..." with NOAA for 14 years...
As for birds, I just mentioned them in passing and not part of my main gripe with farms (which is that they destroy pristine wild areas when sited inappropriately) I certainly don't dispute that cats kill more. But the knee jerk reaction you see from some members here "It's a myth!" is just as bad as Maggat nonsense. For ***** sake, I have killed birds driving down the road and one died flying right into our kitchen window last year (after that we put up decals to make it more visible) so denying that large metal blades spinning quickly through a couple hundred feet of prime flying space is killing birds is about as stupid as saying that offshore oil rigs are great for the environment. This is completely off topic so I am not going to share the studies that have documented the deaths--it is IRRELEVANT because my argument has EXPRESSLY stated that DESPITE the (not insignificant) number of deaths, it is not a reason to prefer fossil fuels to wind energy! PERIOD...